| Doc_id | Review | Left | Term | Right | Sentiment | Polarity | Rating |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Interesting subject & Basic idea to have a dog defined for the exercises is nice but w/o dog hard to benefit. A bit too much talking in front of a wall ;-) Could benefit from more illustrative material. Graphs / Videos / Pictures. Why not show examples of Dogs doing the games, that would be great for people who do not (yet) own a dog. I was hoping to get some insight into problematic dog behaviour but maybe that was wrong expectation. | have a dog defined for the | Exercise | is nice but w/o dog hard | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | This was an amazing course! The format was fantastic and easy to follow and Dr. Brian hare was an engaging speaker, which the videos wonderful to watch. I also really liked that it was self-paced because then I could really try out the Dognition exercises with my dog and have the time to read the book. | could really try out the Dognition | Exercise | with my dog and have the | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | it was a great fun to listen to the course and practice the exercises with my dog! | to the course and practice the | Exercise | with my dog! | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course. Most of the new features and technologies were well explained. Maybe a little more hands-on exercise will not be a bad idea. | explained. Maybe a little more hands-on | Exercise | will not be a bad idea. | Positive | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | While the subject matter was extremely relevant, I didn't think this course was taught well. Much of the lecture and exercise focused on providing direction than actually teaching. I felt as though I was just copying and pasting sample code. At times it was as though the professor was rushing to introduce new modules rather than discussing how and why certain concepts should be used. In most cases, I could have learned the Ionic modules just as well by reading the documentation and looking at sample code, which is often what this course felt like. I'd have much rather seen the concepts explained in more detail than rushing to add new modules without any context. The quizzes are not challenging (the professor always puts the correct answer as the first choice) and the exercises just provide cut/paste code snippets without any reasoning or explanation. I would have preferred to have the exercises conducted by providing a high level goal and then a solution to check against rather than the "put this code here" approach that's used. The assignment grading is either far too obvious (whether a required module was injected or not) or completely arbitrary. Generally the assignments lacked nuance and complexity as well. I didn't feel like I really learned any of the concepts behind this material after going through the course. | well. Much of the lecture and | Exercise | focused on providing direction than actually | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | While the subject matter was extremely relevant, I didn't think this course was taught well. Much of the lecture and exercise focused on providing direction than actually teaching. I felt as though I was just copying and pasting sample code. At times it was as though the professor was rushing to introduce new modules rather than discussing how and why certain concepts should be used. In most cases, I could have learned the Ionic modules just as well by reading the documentation and looking at sample code, which is often what this course felt like. I'd have much rather seen the concepts explained in more detail than rushing to add new modules without any context. The quizzes are not challenging (the professor always puts the correct answer as the first choice) and the exercises just provide cut/paste code snippets without any reasoning or explanation. I would have preferred to have the exercises conducted by providing a high level goal and then a solution to check against rather than the "put this code here" approach that's used. The assignment grading is either far too obvious (whether a required module was injected or not) or completely arbitrary. Generally the assignments lacked nuance and complexity as well. I didn't feel like I really learned any of the concepts behind this material after going through the course. | as the first choice) and the | Exercise | just provide cut/paste code snippets without | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | While the subject matter was extremely relevant, I didn't think this course was taught well. Much of the lecture and exercise focused on providing direction than actually teaching. I felt as though I was just copying and pasting sample code. At times it was as though the professor was rushing to introduce new modules rather than discussing how and why certain concepts should be used. In most cases, I could have learned the Ionic modules just as well by reading the documentation and looking at sample code, which is often what this course felt like. I'd have much rather seen the concepts explained in more detail than rushing to add new modules without any context. The quizzes are not challenging (the professor always puts the correct answer as the first choice) and the exercises just provide cut/paste code snippets without any reasoning or explanation. I would have preferred to have the exercises conducted by providing a high level goal and then a solution to check against rather than the "put this code here" approach that's used. The assignment grading is either far too obvious (whether a required module was injected or not) or completely arbitrary. Generally the assignments lacked nuance and complexity as well. I didn't feel like I really learned any of the concepts behind this material after going through the course. | would have preferred to have the | Exercise | conducted by providing a high level | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Definitely recommended. Prof is as always amazing. Explains concepts well and gives excellent examples. Exercises are top-notch as well. | concepts well and gives excellent examples. | Exercise | are top-notch as well. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It began with the basics of Ionic and it ended with an APK that I've installed on my phone! This MOOC is a life changing one, It includes a lot of amazing extra resources that you can learn from and the exercises were very important in helping me understand all the concepts taught. It also encouraged me to go there and try many ngCordova plugins on my own. | you can learn from and the | Exercise | were very important in helping me | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent course! Informative theoretical course and great practical exercises. | Informative theoretical course and great practical | Exercise | | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | I can't just rating and didn't write a preview. Because this course is so useful and have a great lecturer. What I like most is, the exercise, the assignment is so really EXCITING and make me want to learn more about whole MEAN stack. Biggest thank's for the Lecturer. Really recommended for you who still reading and don't want to purchase this course. Because this is really WORTH it! Thank you. God Bless you! | What I like most is, the | Exercise | the assignment is so really EXCITING | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This course serves as a great introduction to mobile web development. Notice that multiplatform in this case means iOS and Android (no Windows Phone) and you do get a bit of hands on work on Android SDK and XCode, although mostly for setting up both environments. Professor Muppala is again outstanding in the class, covering a wide range of topics combined with multiple exercises which in my case really furthered my understanding. One thing I believe could improve would be having either at least one assignment forcing you to deploy to Android and another one to iOS. In my case, it was just too comfortable to simply deploy to an iOS device and barely look at Android. Also, the vibration function should not be part of an assignment, as not everyone will have a device to test it and neither of the emulators really use it. One final recommendation for those pressed with time: I was able to follow Professor Muppala quite easily while playing the lectures at 1.75x (it's funny how slow he seems to speak when I set in back to 1x :-) ). | range of topics combined with multiple | Exercise | which in my case really furthered | Positive | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | less complex exercises to check and validate | less complex | Exercise | to check and validate | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | This is an excellent introduction to programming. The exercises are very dynamic and the tutors did a great job by explaining the program, both in English and Spanish. The bonus interview might seem like extra time but it's totally worth it. The only recommendation for the class is not to rush the exercises after the 3 week. Thank you! | an excellent introduction to programming. The | Exercise | are very dynamic and the tutors | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | This is an excellent introduction to programming. The exercises are very dynamic and the tutors did a great job by explaining the program, both in English and Spanish. The bonus interview might seem like extra time but it's totally worth it. The only recommendation for the class is not to rush the exercises after the 3 week. Thank you! | class is not to rush the | Exercise | after the 3 week. Thank you! | Positive | 0.85 | 4.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | Excellent course! The content is great in quality, quantity and structure!! 5 stars to that! However, I am giving 4 stars since passing the course or not depends mostly on Extension Exercises, which at the beginning seem to be optional but they in fact mandatory. | or not depends mostly on Extension | Exercise | which at the beginning seem to | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | This was truly and excellent introduction to systems engineering. The facilitators presented the course content in the simplest methodology, utilizing diagrams to aid comprehension. The exercises and extended-exercises gave an opportunity to apply the knowledge acquired to verify and validate complete understanding and application of the course materials. | utilizing diagrams to aid comprehension. The | Exercise | and extended-exercises gave an opportunity to | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | I've missed at least one practical exercises on each module. Overall is good. | I've missed at least one practical | Exercise | on each module. Overall is good. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It was a good course but there were things missing, such as exercises and more examples. | there were things missing, such as | Exercise | and more examples. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Please include exercises for computing the ratios and the valuation methods. In-video questions would have helped more. The quiz does not actually test the understanding of the topic in-depth. There can be some external readings suggested - resources that help us get more understanding on the subjects discussed. | Please include | Exercise | for computing the ratios and the | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | exercises to practice and check correct application of the concepts | | Exercise | to practice and check correct application | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Great course but, in 2 videos, the professor makes reference to exercises that should be for downloading and they are not. Please, either include them or re shoot the videos. | videos, the professor makes reference to | Exercise | that should be for downloading and | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | The concepts are very clear, but in order to get understanding I think it's necesary to provide additional exercises | think it's necesary to provide additional | Exercise | | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | GOOD COURSE! I can learn a lot of basic conception about econometircs, and the training exercises is good for me to understand what the teachers has taught in the course! | conception about econometircs, and the training | Exercise | is good for me to understand | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Not much teaching going on here. The concepts are barely touched on before the student is asked to jump into training exercises that require lengthy proofs of concepts not thoroughly taught. | is asked to jump into training | Exercise | that require lengthy proofs of concepts | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Good content and exercise, very pedagogic. The only problem are the use of the program: If you don't know how to use a statistical program such as R, you will spend more time struggling with the program than understanding the topic. | Good content and | Exercise | very pedagogic. The only problem are | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | A BRILLIANT, BRILLIANT COURSE, the teachers put A LOT of effort into making the lecture slides and videos. Everything was explained multiple times such that the student understands it better. Also, computer vision, especially geometric vision is difficult to understand without a proper background in linear algebra, but the teachers' explanation was enough to fill the gaps so that even someone with only a minimalistic knowledge of linear algebra was able to consume the content. The exercises were a class apart, they were very well structured with tangible results at the end of each, And each of the exercises brought together the key points of the lectures, so that the student could easily implement them in code and test out the algorithm. Last but the not the least, the community was very active with the teaching assistants pitching in wherever necessary, in particular, Stephen did a great job of understanding the issues students were facing and taking appropriate action. All in All, a very well structured course to jump start one's career into computer vision. | able to consume the content. The | Exercise | were a class apart, they were | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | A BRILLIANT, BRILLIANT COURSE, the teachers put A LOT of effort into making the lecture slides and videos. Everything was explained multiple times such that the student understands it better. Also, computer vision, especially geometric vision is difficult to understand without a proper background in linear algebra, but the teachers' explanation was enough to fill the gaps so that even someone with only a minimalistic knowledge of linear algebra was able to consume the content. The exercises were a class apart, they were very well structured with tangible results at the end of each, And each of the exercises brought together the key points of the lectures, so that the student could easily implement them in code and test out the algorithm. Last but the not the least, the community was very active with the teaching assistants pitching in wherever necessary, in particular, Stephen did a great job of understanding the issues students were facing and taking appropriate action. All in All, a very well structured course to jump start one's career into computer vision. | of each, And each of the | Exercise | brought together the key points of | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I found the course pretty basic. It did cover the topics well , however, in-depth understanding and newer concepts (for eg. exercises on time quadrants) could have been introduced & explained in detail. | understanding and newer concepts (for eg. | Exercise | on time quadrants) could have been | Negative | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Great and comprehensive video material. The book and programming exercises provide extra learning opportunities. I'm sure to be using my newly developed statistics skills in my PhD. | video material. The book and programming | Exercise | provide extra learning opportunities. I'm sure | Negative | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Great course! This has been one of the best courses that I have taken at Coursera. I really liked the fact that we have a free book for the class and there are optional exercises for practicing what we have learned at the end of each week. The instructor knows the subject and is very clear. | the class and there are optional | Exercise | for practicing what we have learned | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This is a brilliant course that makes statistics and probability as approachable, engaging and clear as humanely possible. Prof. Mine Cetinkaya-Rundel explains every subject very clearly, and has included some very effective quizzes and lab exercises. I first encountered R markdown files in this course and have used them constantly ever since. My only tiny point of criticism is that the non-graded exercise quizzes are way easier than the real quizzes, and do not really prepare you at all to the more complex questions in the actual quizzes. It's a petty and unimportant kind of criticism in an otherwise wonderful course. If everyone taught stats like Prof. Cetinkaya-Rundel, this important subject would have been a whole lot better understood and utilized globally. | some very effective quizzes and lab | Exercise | I first encountered R markdown files | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This is a brilliant course that makes statistics and probability as approachable, engaging and clear as humanely possible. Prof. Mine Cetinkaya-Rundel explains every subject very clearly, and has included some very effective quizzes and lab exercises. I first encountered R markdown files in this course and have used them constantly ever since. My only tiny point of criticism is that the non-graded exercise quizzes are way easier than the real quizzes, and do not really prepare you at all to the more complex questions in the actual quizzes. It's a petty and unimportant kind of criticism in an otherwise wonderful course. If everyone taught stats like Prof. Cetinkaya-Rundel, this important subject would have been a whole lot better understood and utilized globally. | of criticism is that the non-graded | Exercise | quizzes are way easier than the | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | One of the well made MOOCs. There are many courses in Coursera taught by good professors from good universities but are badly designed for an MOOC environment making it a bad experience. This course is really well designed. The contents is modular and lectures are split into easy to grasp chunks. The weekly lab exercises using R using real datasets is a plus. Though not much of R syntax is taught and it is up to us to explore(understandable since the goal of this course is not to teach R). The final project was a bit challenging but fun. The course 'mentors' are helpful. | to grasp chunks. The weekly lab | Exercise | using R using real datasets is | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Absolutely wonderful course With the basics of Probability and Statistics to it's implementation in R Everything is very simple and the text book is very much in accordance to the course, also the lab exercises are very well planned out | to the course, also the lab | Exercise | are very well planned out | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Fantastic course with great exercises | Fantastic course with great | Exercise | | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This course was excellent, the teaching material top-notch and with excellent pedagogy. It's amazing that the course authors offer a statistics textbook almost exactly covering the course content for free. The idea to combine R and statistics is right on the money too, thanks to this one can learn 2 skills at the same time, with statistical analysis letting you practice coding in R and R helping you visualise your statistics. The lectures are divided into small, easy to absorb chunks and the teacher does an excellent job explaining the material, giving very good examples and analogies to help the students understand concepts. The exercises and assignments are fun to complete, and the course offers a flexibility in how much time you spend on it per week, e.g. there are non-mandatory exercises to do. | help the students understand concepts. The | Exercise | and assignments are fun to complete, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This course was excellent, the teaching material top-notch and with excellent pedagogy. It's amazing that the course authors offer a statistics textbook almost exactly covering the course content for free. The idea to combine R and statistics is right on the money too, thanks to this one can learn 2 skills at the same time, with statistical analysis letting you practice coding in R and R helping you visualise your statistics. The lectures are divided into small, easy to absorb chunks and the teacher does an excellent job explaining the material, giving very good examples and analogies to help the students understand concepts. The exercises and assignments are fun to complete, and the course offers a flexibility in how much time you spend on it per week, e.g. there are non-mandatory exercises to do. | week, e. g. there are non-mandatory | Exercise | to do. | Negative | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Material is fantastic. Instructor explains this very well and exercises are useful. | Instructor explains this very well and | Exercise | are useful. | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Interesting and enjoyable. Very clear explanation of concepts in the videos and text. Begin using R in the first week, with exercises that allow you to pick up a few commands fairly easily and start analysing data and creating graphs. | R in the first week, with | Exercise | that allow you to pick up | Negative | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| 2g7bdO-KEeWTgg7cwVeSqQ | I think it's a good way to introduce the world of "accounting" but I think videos need to be more specific and I would have appreciated if there was some practical exercise and not only quiz! But all the informations are exposed clearly. | appreciated if there was some practical | Exercise | and not only quiz! But all | Negative | 0.94 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A very thorough explanation to the concepts. I would like more challenges and an exercise section to practice what i've learned so far.This would be very important. | would like more challenges and an | Exercise | section to practice what i've learned | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | The instructor videos were clear and informative. The course had a balanced mix of game development theory and practical exercises. Solid introduction to the Unity game design platform. The projects increased in difficulty and time commitment as the course progressed, building on prior knowledge. The peer review of game files was challenging at times, but it was a good experience to create actual games. | of game development theory and practical | Exercise | Solid introduction to the Unity game | Positive | 0.88 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very well designed, excellent material and the practical exercises were very fun | designed, excellent material and the practical | Exercise | were very fun | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I'm currently starting week 3 of this and already I feel I have got a huge amount out of it. I was not a complete beginner going in, but with the course taking me back to real basics, I found it helped fill in a lot of blanks that I didn't even know I had. Even if the rest of the course from week 3 turns out to not be as good, I will still feel I got a tremendous amount out of this! The tutor is straightforward and an excellent lecturer, the course is so far structured really well and the practical exercises are simple to set up and get going on. | structured really well and the practical | Exercise | are simple to set up and | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 2InHZhR3EeW_mxLPrCkAqw | Minor mistakes in examples and exercises. | Minor mistakes in examples and | Exercise | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 2QKA3X3EEeW-FwqtbgSK1Q | It teaches an interesting topic, but it's a bit hard to follow the teacher. I learnt from the exercises, mostly. | the teacher. I learnt from the | Exercise | mostly. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Fascinating course about how the internet developed and how security works. Seeing interviews with some of the prime movers and developers in this field was particularly rewarding. The encryption exercises were great fun too. | field was particularly rewarding. The encryption | Exercise | were great fun too. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Excellent course with lots of practical exercises. | Excellent course with lots of practical | Exercise | | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good, sometimes is a little hard, but is very helpful and have a lot of practical exercises | and have a lot of practical | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course covers most important topics in depth and exercises are very interesting, them helps you to reason about some important theoretical concepts. | most important topics in depth and | Exercise | are very interesting, them helps you | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | I was pretty disappointed with this course. Firstly, the course did not seem well balanced meaning that some weeks--particularly week 2--had A LOT of materials to watch and really felt like it was two weeks crammed into one, and then other weeks barely had anything. Secondly, the exercises seemed unclear, poorly thought out and not really helpful. There were many errata that really should have been fixed in the beta iterations of this course. Thirdly, I really would like to see more application and less discussion of implementing algorithms. Fourthly, the "scaling" section was also a major disappointment. While it is mildly interesting to learn about stochastic gradient descent, I think it would have been more interesting to have a discussion about how classifiers work in a parallelized computing environment or actually to try one out using Spark. Finally, given that GraphLab/Dato/Turi was just acquired by Apple, I question whether it is worthwhile to take this course as ALL the materials are taught using a library that in all likelihood will cease to exist. | weeks barely had anything. Secondly, the | Exercise | seemed unclear, poorly thought out and | Negative | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | A very good course, with effective intuitive explanations of what the algorithms are supposed to achieve and how. The exercises in Python help understand the topic and fix it in memory. | supposed to achieve and how. The | Exercise | in Python help understand the topic | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Exercises for Scikit-learn users were not organised. Course took too long to start | | Exercise | for Scikit-learn users were not organised. | Negative | 0.68 | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | First. I like these courses allot. They are pretty close to covering just what you need to actually do machine learning in the real world and not dive too deep into topics that have no practical value. However: This course was a bit too thin, the last 4 weeks of the course contained little in depth informations and seemed to brush over allot of different topics that could have contained more information. Although they where important topics the course could go more in depth on at least 3 or 4 of those topics. The last 3 weeks could have been a course on its own if properly explored. However the concepts are well enough covered to be usable in practice i belive. The programming exercises where ridiculously simple. Everything was reduced to filling in 1 or two lines in a bigger function. I understand that the point was to see how these functions are made and that it increases our understanding of the algorithms already existing in packages like schikit-learn and graphlab. Also the content became a bit too repetetive (actually started in the second course but continues in this course). The time used on variation over the same topic in different models made it challenging to pay attention when the lecture finally came to a new point (brain fell a sleep while waiting for something new). | in practice i belive. The programming | Exercise | where ridiculously simple. Everything was reduced | Negative | 0.83 | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | I really love this Classification course as well as Regression course!! This course is covering both mathematical background and practical implementation very well. Assignments are moderately challenging and it was a very good exercise for me to have a good intuition about classification algorithms. I only used standard Python libraries such as numpy, scikit-learn, matplotlib and pandas, and there were no problems for me to complete all of the assignments without any use of IPython, SFrames, GraphLab Create at all. I would say thank you so much to Carlos and Emily to give me such a great course!! P.S. This course would be perfect if it covered bootstrap and Random Forest in details. | and it was a very good | Exercise | for me to have a good | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | A bit easy to get through the exercises bur otherwise a very enlightening and inspiring course. - This is btw a positive review if anybody should be in doubt after taking this course :) | bit easy to get through the | Exercise | bur otherwise a very enlightening and | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | A lot of interesting parts of the course are available as optional and a lot of the difficult parts of the coding exercises are provided to you - the challenge is not there. :/ | the difficult parts of the coding | Exercise | are provided to you - the | Positive | 0.65 | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course is interesting and well taught. The professor is very enthusiastic and it makes the course fun to watch. The problem in my opinion is that the content is too superficial. It's completely lack of mathematical background and the programming exercises are sometimes no more than copy paste. | of mathematical background and the programming | Exercise | are sometimes no more than copy | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | These Machine Learning classes have been fantastic so far, really enjoying them. Very good coverage of topics and challenging exercises to drive home the learning. The effort put into developing the classes has been superb and I look forward to the rest of the specialization. | good coverage of topics and challenging | Exercise | to drive home the learning. The | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Capstone exercises were very ambiguous, the students were left to interpret they way they had to finish and how they rated their peers. The peer reviews were poor with little to no feedback and the focus was on how the material was laid out vs what the content was. I have done other coursers and capstones in Coursera this was one of the poorest. UIUC has to revamp this. More guidance to students in the instructions would be the first step. | Capstone | Exercise | were very ambiguous, the students were | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | An alright starting course, but the exercises could be a little more in depth | An alright starting course, but the | Exercise | could be a little more in | Negative | 0.71 | 3.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Very intuitive Beginning Korean Course. The method of teaching was clear and detail. I just wish there would be more exercise for student to practice to get used to the Korean alphabet/vocabulary. Overall outstanding course. | just wish there would be more | Exercise | for student to practice to get | Negative | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It is a very good course for everyone to learn basic of Korean. For me who have learned Korean by read Korean lesson book somehow this course not give much thing to learn. GRAMMAR (5/5) This course is good because it give me more insight about Korean grammar (difference between normal. formal, and informal speech; the using of 예요/ 이에요, 이/가, etc). THE TEACHER (5/5) She explain clearly and give some exercise in the video to make us practice. I like the method. VOCABULARY (3/5) There were not much vocabulary in the course. I hope Yonsei University would add more new vocabulary in the course. TEST/ ASSIGNMENT (3/5) I've taken another language online course at another site that similar to Coursera. That site's assignments more complex than this course's given. This site only test our reading and listening but there were not speaking aspect that scored here. And I wish you will add writing aspect to the course. LESSON (3/5) The lessons those given here really simple. They were easy to understand, but I hope there will be a sequel of this course that will give us more advance lessons. Recommendation: - add more vocabulary, - add speaking and writing assignment, - a sequel of this course. Thank you for coursera and Yonsei University for giving me an opportunity to learn Korean Language for free. | She explain clearly and give some | Exercise | in the video to make us | Negative | 0.89 | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I learnt invaluable things in this course. I never knew of the Freytag's pyramid or the 21 point act structure etc and little by little, after doing the exercises, I feel I have learnt to edit my manuscript well enough. That has been my achievement as a learner of this course. Thanks a lot for the course. :) | little by little, after doing the | Exercise | I feel I have learnt to | Positive | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Felt very much like an exercise in writing-by-numbers. Assignment instructions were too vague and the pass/fail grading system meant lots of classmates were upset that their work was not appreciated or understood. So many people on the course do not have English as a first language that the marking is often erratic. Great that non-native speakers are trying to write in English, enriching the canon, but in those circumstances a pass/fail system seems misguided. | Felt very much like an | Exercise | in writing-by-numbers. Assignment instructions were too | Negative | 0.78 | 2.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good exercises. Good, interesting, helpful teacher. short lessons. concrete instructions | Good | Exercise | Good, interesting, helpful teacher. short lessons. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good material. Brando Skyhorse is a very talented lecturer. The exercises look simple but are actually very difficult, so set aside more time than you expect to complete them within the parameters. | is a very talented lecturer. The | Exercise | look simple but are actually very | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Extremely innovative exercises and guidelines. Really opens one s brain to think creatively. The intructions for assignments need a bit more clarification. A worthy ue of hard earned money. Thanks Coursera | Extremely innovative | Exercise | and guidelines. Really opens one s | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 3mA6QTIyEeWsOA5fzAmxbw | Excellent course with amazing practical exercises! | Excellent course with amazing practical | Exercise | | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Love this course and enjoyed the shiny apps building exercise. | and enjoyed the shiny apps building | Exercise | | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Good overview of available tools. Lack of practice exercises makes preparing for quizzes difficult. However, the course project does a good job to get your feet wet with Shiny Apps. | of available tools. Lack of practice | Exercise | makes preparing for quizzes difficult. However, | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | If you're currently working in a leadership role this course provides some thoughtful exercises and content you can apply to your day job. Good content (nothing earth-shattering, but a good presentation of the issues). | role this course provides some thoughtful | Exercise | and content you can apply to | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The content is well presented. The exercises are valuable but the grading process needs improved. | The content is well presented. The | Exercise | are valuable but the grading process | Positive | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think that it is great course. Although it is rather theoretical then practical course it is made in perfect way. Everything is shown on a examples and there are some exercises. | a examples and there are some | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good and interesting course, with lots of research based advice. There are several practical exercises which deepens the knowledge. The lecturers are also very good, and they present the information in the very good manner. | based advice. There are several practical | Exercise | which deepens the knowledge. The lecturers | Negative | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| 487jV_KLEeS5LyIAC3lSsg | Excellent course! Many materials, very good lectures and very practically comprehensive exercises. Congratulations. | good lectures and very practically comprehensive | Exercise | Congratulations. | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| 4IKVIdWxEeWlbgqNCYymGw | I think this information is very dated - Calories In/Calories Out, High Carb/Low Fat, recommending exercise to lose weight, vegetable oils recommended/animal fats denigrated . . . . so many recommendations that have little 'science' behind them, and which have not produced good results for 95% of the people who have used them. I've lost weight with a lower calorie diet and exercise, so, yes, it can work, but it is very difficult. I've kept it off easily for two years with a high fat/low carb eating plan. I've changed my exercise to mostly Pilates when my weight stabilized and I enjoy it enough to stay with it. knowing how difficult it is to stick to a low fat/high carb diet - which causes me to struggle with cravings, even when I am eating unprocessed organic seasonal local food - I hate to see a low fat diet recommended to people struggling with losing weight. I recommend "The Big Fat Surprise" and "Good Calories, Bad Calories" as an alternate view of healthy living. | In/Calories Out, High Carb/Low Fat, recommending | Exercise | to lose weight, vegetable oils recommended/animal | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| 4IKVIdWxEeWlbgqNCYymGw | I think this information is very dated - Calories In/Calories Out, High Carb/Low Fat, recommending exercise to lose weight, vegetable oils recommended/animal fats denigrated . . . . so many recommendations that have little 'science' behind them, and which have not produced good results for 95% of the people who have used them. I've lost weight with a lower calorie diet and exercise, so, yes, it can work, but it is very difficult. I've kept it off easily for two years with a high fat/low carb eating plan. I've changed my exercise to mostly Pilates when my weight stabilized and I enjoy it enough to stay with it. knowing how difficult it is to stick to a low fat/high carb diet - which causes me to struggle with cravings, even when I am eating unprocessed organic seasonal local food - I hate to see a low fat diet recommended to people struggling with losing weight. I recommend "The Big Fat Surprise" and "Good Calories, Bad Calories" as an alternate view of healthy living. | with a lower calorie diet and | Exercise | so, yes, it can work, but | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| 4IKVIdWxEeWlbgqNCYymGw | I think this information is very dated - Calories In/Calories Out, High Carb/Low Fat, recommending exercise to lose weight, vegetable oils recommended/animal fats denigrated . . . . so many recommendations that have little 'science' behind them, and which have not produced good results for 95% of the people who have used them. I've lost weight with a lower calorie diet and exercise, so, yes, it can work, but it is very difficult. I've kept it off easily for two years with a high fat/low carb eating plan. I've changed my exercise to mostly Pilates when my weight stabilized and I enjoy it enough to stay with it. knowing how difficult it is to stick to a low fat/high carb diet - which causes me to struggle with cravings, even when I am eating unprocessed organic seasonal local food - I hate to see a low fat diet recommended to people struggling with losing weight. I recommend "The Big Fat Surprise" and "Good Calories, Bad Calories" as an alternate view of healthy living. | carb eating plan. I've changed my | Exercise | to mostly Pilates when my weight | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | Thanks for this nice course. I would recommend to avoid exercises with very long calculations that cause time-limit problems. Regards | course. I would recommend to avoid | Exercise | with very long calculations that cause | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | it is good , but some items needs to be illustrated in more details , a great thing of this course is that it gives a lot of practice exercises | it gives a lot of practice | Exercise | | Positive | 0.98 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I am a bit disappointed by this course. I was expecting a more fast paced course with more information regarding Angular. Unfortunately in the videos there is a lot of time spent on unnecessary details and reading out loud the source code. The exercises are quite basic and they did not pose real challenges - except for errors coming from mismatched packages or mistakes in configuration files. Also I think that the level of support provided by the mentors of this course is lacking. Mentors are quite absent and very late in providing any help in the forums so the students have to kind of counsel one another - that is sometimes good but a proper class also requires a good level of supervision. All in all I think this is an OK course that is mostly geared to the uninitiated. It needs some serious work to make it a great course. | out loud the source code. The | Exercise | are quite basic and they did | Negative | 0.65 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I definitely enjoyed doing this course. The exercises really helped me understand it and it makes you more involved. | definitely enjoyed doing this course. The | Exercise | really helped me understand it and | Positive | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course will help you to fall in love with AngularJS. Great explanation and exercise, assignments. Thank you very much. | love with AngularJS. Great explanation and | Exercise | assignments. Thank you very much. | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It was informative course. Assignments could be more involved, and exercises could be more open-ended. | Assignments could be more involved, and | Exercise | could be more open-ended. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A great course on Angular JS, explained in an excellent practical manner. Exercise videos clearly show and allow us to practice along which makes the understanding very effective. | explained in an excellent practical manner. | Exercise | videos clearly show and allow us | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A massive amount of content to cover, some of it quite advanced. The exercises become fraught if your code is out of sync with the tutor's code. Things won't work, you won't know why, and there's no real recovery from that. | some of it quite advanced. The | Exercise | become fraught if your code is | Positive | 0.63 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A whole lot of information to absorb, that I will definitely agree with! If there was anything I wish went into more detail, there would be two things. 1) Yo / Yeoman: This part of the course was more of an "Obligatory" lecture, just to say it's mentioned. I watched that one video many times over, but still ended up going to YouTube for actual "training" on the ins and outs. I know time is constrained in MOOC's and you don't get the full load of knowledge you would in a traditional school. However, my thoughts are that either give us an exercise so we can at least have that as experience in using it, or just remove it completely. The lecture was put together as a sort of "Follow Along", but it really felt rushed and more of an "Obligatory" thing than an actual lesson. 2) Give us more detail on the difference between Services and Factories. Keep in mind that I still have Multi-Platform Mobile App Development, and Server Side Development with Node.js still to go, so I don't know if these are explained more in those courses. As it stands right now, I -still- don't know the difference between a factory and a service, or even what a provider is. When should I use a factory? When should I use a service? Which is better suited for what task? All those questions I do not have an answer for after this course, which feels a bit short for me. | are that either give us an | Exercise | so we can at least have | Negative | 0.99 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Angular JS is a crucial component of all of the internet. Hardly a website exists without it and it's clear that Angular will go places. However, this course fails on a few crucial levels. As such, my review might look scathing and I'll detail why in a minute, but I want you to know that this course is quite possibly invaluable when it comes to web development. Besides, the fixes that would need to be made on the instructor's side are minor, but when working without those fixes, things get infuriatingly frustrating rather quickly. There are errors in the code supplied by the instructor that need to be pointed out by students, scripts sometimes don't work, explanations are sub-par when explaining things such as $scope. There are parts that are seemingly there to pad out the lessons such as Task Runners. Sometimes, doing things exactly the way shown in the video with additional fixes by both the professor and students, it still doesn't work. Some exercises are an hour long for something that won't be quizzed in the end. Understanding that this review was made about a new course that covers something rapidly changing and not persistent, I still did learn a lot of valuable things and I would recommend this course to everyone involved in web development. However, be prepared to question your own sanity, your skills, the software you use, software in general and just despair at times. All in all, it is a price worth paying for the amazing knowledge you gain. | students, it still doesn't work. Some | Exercise | are an hour long for something | Negative | 0.98 | 2.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Overall, this is a very effective introduction to AngularJS. AngularJS can be intimidating or confusing, and this course is largely an introduction, but the videos and exercises do a great job of letting you get over the initial learning curve. This course will give you a thorough foundation in AngularJS, way better than any other free course online, and will give you an idea of where you can go off and explore on your own if you're interested in going on to develop intermediate skills. My only critique of this course is that I really had to explore the "additional materials" at the end of each section to get a grasp of some of the concepts. I found that some of the videos oversimplified pretty complicated subjects and weren't thorough enough to allow you to complete some of the exercises. I also think the course briefly introduces some pretty complicated tools too early to new developers and doesn't do a good job of explaining their value (like Grunt and Gulp). However, this course is still amazing for a free course. If you've done any of the quick tutorials in AngularJS (like codeacademy's), you've really only scratched the surface of AngularJS. A hands-on course like this give you a much better foundation. To conclude, despite it's minor flaws, this is still the best free introduction to AngularJS online today. Good luck! | an introduction, but the videos and | Exercise | do a great job of letting | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Overall, this is a very effective introduction to AngularJS. AngularJS can be intimidating or confusing, and this course is largely an introduction, but the videos and exercises do a great job of letting you get over the initial learning curve. This course will give you a thorough foundation in AngularJS, way better than any other free course online, and will give you an idea of where you can go off and explore on your own if you're interested in going on to develop intermediate skills. My only critique of this course is that I really had to explore the "additional materials" at the end of each section to get a grasp of some of the concepts. I found that some of the videos oversimplified pretty complicated subjects and weren't thorough enough to allow you to complete some of the exercises. I also think the course briefly introduces some pretty complicated tools too early to new developers and doesn't do a good job of explaining their value (like Grunt and Gulp). However, this course is still amazing for a free course. If you've done any of the quick tutorials in AngularJS (like codeacademy's), you've really only scratched the surface of AngularJS. A hands-on course like this give you a much better foundation. To conclude, despite it's minor flaws, this is still the best free introduction to AngularJS online today. Good luck! | you to complete some of the | Exercise | I also think the course briefly | Positive | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really good course to get your feet wet! A good mix of theory and exercises. Loved it! | A good mix of theory and | Exercise | Loved it! | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course. Jogesh has done wonderful job in designing the hands on exercises. | job in designing the hands on | Exercise | | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good Angular exercises. But I think that testing should get its own segment. Becomes a bit lengthy with 30 min videos and only scraping the surface on the subject. | Good Angular | Exercise | But I think that testing should | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Was very difficult to follow. This is a complex subject and the prof is trying his best, but there are times the explanation is not sufficient. Instructions for installing gulp was not good. I was unable to complete the following exercises after gulp installation failed. Instruction needs to be short and crisp. Building on top of each other project has its negative. There must be solution at the end or at least a check point where you can start clean for the next project. | was unable to complete the following | Exercise | after gulp installation failed. Instruction needs | Negative | 0.84 | 2.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | steps for exercises are not clear. | steps for | Exercise | are not clear. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | great teacher with an solid approach . the course is full of exercises and built in a way to increment as bigger project . Excellent !!! | . the course is full of | Exercise | and built in a way to | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very interesting course and very well structured. The subjects are handled with the correct depth corresponding to its importance. The indicated time spent by week corresponds accurately to the time needed, if you have some previous experience in web development. The exercises are focused in the important details and very well organized. If you have interest in client side web development and particularly in Angular, this is a very good opportunity to learn. Probably in a near future this course must be updated to cover Angular 2.0. It really worth the time spent! | previous experience in web development. The | Exercise | are focused in the important details | Positive | 0.91 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I liked this course, especially in the way is built. The subject was not so easy but anyway, thanks to the organization of lectures and exercises, i was able to achieve the target. The teacher is good and clear in the explanation. | to the organization of lectures and | Exercise | i was able to achieve the | Positive | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course. Going through all the exercises and doing the assignments was a great way to get introduced to Front-end development for me. | Excellent course. Going through all the | Exercise | and doing the assignments was a | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Dr Muppala and HKUST have produced a real winner here. The lecture material is explained very well, and the exercises are carefully crafted to focus your attention on the current lesson without being distracted by stuff that is not necessarily relevant. The course builds on previous courses, but those are not necessarily required for understanding this one -- it stands on its own. By the end of the course, the student should have a clear understanding of how Angular.js works, what are its strengths and weaknesses, and how to build applications using this tool set. Supporting tools (build tools, test tools) are also covered. | is explained very well, and the | Exercise | are carefully crafted to focus your | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pretty good coverage of Angular as whole, how to setup a Angular project, and how it fits into bigger picture web development. Criticisms: - Overall, the code presentation (in exercises, provided files, and the slides) was ugly. Good looking and properly styled code is important to ingrain, and this course fell pretty short there. Code was (very) poorly indented, had inconsistent single vs. double quotes, and didn't follow any style guide out there. Use some beautifier and make sure jshint doesn't have any suggestions for improvement! Slides need at least some monospaced font; better would be colored code snippets or screenshots. - The Gulp and Grunt week felt pretty strangely structured. The two task runners just had such long lectures videos that it was a really big hump to get over, especially since we didn't use Grunt later. - (harder to fix) My files got pretty inconsistent with what I needed to copy/download over week-by-week from the course. Some sort of git repository and easier way to pull changes would be good. I ended up version controlling every week and every week's assignment. So yeah, I'd say this was worth taking, but some parts of the setup are pretty frustrating and version controlling makes life much easier. | - Overall, the code presentation (in | Exercise | provided files, and the slides) was | Positive | 0.68 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Amount of AngularJS topics covered by the course is too small. All assignments are very typical, just copy-paste from lecture exercises. | very typical, just copy-paste from lecture | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I love the style of the courses in this specialization. The exercises are useful and set you up for the assignments. I also really appreciate how the instructor guides you in the use of tools like bower, grunt, gulp and yo, and that he takes the time to cover unit and end-to-end testing. Looking forward to the next course! | the courses in this specialization. The | Exercise | are useful and set you up | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very useful material, the professor teaches it at a good pace and at an easy to understand level, the exercises are easy to follow and replicating the professor's steps is very simple (except for the Gulp steps, but that's not graded anyway), so you can follow how he did what he did | an easy to understand level, the | Exercise | are easy to follow and replicating | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | What an awesome course. The teacher is top-class, really knows the subject, and how to continually explain each module. The video exercises are just made for the student to grasp the content. One of the best courses I hev experienced on Coursera. | continually explain each module. The video | Exercise | are just made for the student | Negative | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very interesting approach, even-though some exercise are not clear enough. | Very interesting approach, even-though some | Exercise | are not clear enough. | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | I really enjoyed this course. It's an excellent exercise in applying game theory to competitive situations. As an IP professional, I found it helpful to see the other aspects of competitive positioning beyond patenting. | enjoyed this course. It's an excellent | Exercise | in applying game theory to competitive | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent lectures, well thought out. Exercises were too easy but a great intro course. | Excellent lectures, well thought out. | Exercise | were too easy but a great | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | It's a pretty well structured course with one exercise after every lecture that helps you to learn properly. | pretty well structured course with one | Exercise | after every lecture that helps you | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Wonderful exercise for your brain. That is simple story about math magic in real life. | Wonderful | Exercise | for your brain. That is simple | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| 68PSjeudEeWwngojZhi1dw | Ok. It was a rerun and there wasn't much help in the Forum and there were too few exercises. But it was really interesting. | Forum and there were too few | Exercise | But it was really interesting. | Negative | 0.79 | 3.0 |
| 6AL8FY7BEeW5gxKDBxYMJw | The information presented by the professor are valuable but I think we there should have been more practical exercises to enforce the concepts that being learnt. | there should have been more practical | Exercise | to enforce the concepts that being | Negative | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Really nice course, including the hands-on exercises! | Really nice course, including the hands-on | Exercise | | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course was interesting. It's truly an introduction to the field. I've actually read about Game Design in my spare time and it was nice to remember some of the concepts I've seen. It's all positive and good but I'd have liked to see the assignments handled a bit differently. It just felt too much one way, especially with one page rule. I do understand this is done to keep people organized and not going crazy with their ideas because since it's peer reviewed it should be fair. Also, once your game idea from an earlier week didn't have much room to introduce the aspect presented in the current week you feel kind of stuck. Although assignments mention we should build on previous weeks' games there is also mention to building a new game too. That part could be clarified or the nature of the exercise can be much more varied than one page requirement. | clarified or the nature of the | Exercise | can be much more varied than | Positive | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | It goes direct to very basic and fundamentally important aspects of game design. Will make you ponder (and exercise) everything in a simple and meaningful way. Recommended! | design. Will make you ponder (and | Exercise | everything in a simple and meaningful | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | It is practical and inspiraing. The exercises are easy to highly relevant to the course and also helpful for my job. | It is practical and inspiraing. The | Exercise | are easy to highly relevant to | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | This course is to the point the lessons are designed so that they can be accessible and they're broken down into smaller pieces so that they're not too much . the exercises are interesting since you have to keep in mind what you want to do with journalism yourself. They help you to organize this idea you might have in your mind or think about it. | they're not too much . the | Exercise | are interesting since you have to | Negative | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | I liked that it focus on new media, however I missed some text material to support the classes. Some minor mistakes on the exercises still need to be fixed. Some videos could be better produced, but the content is very good and I understand that it is also intended to be view on cellphones, so it was good. | classes. Some minor mistakes on the | Exercise | still need to be fixed. Some | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Interesting review of many of the theoretical aspects. It completely lacks practice though. No exercises, no real world scenarios... | It completely lacks practice though. No | Exercise | no real world scenarios. . . | Negative | 0.98 | 3.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very simplistic in places and preaches their style as if it is the only way sometimes too. However it's a good grounding in the basics and there are some useful exercises. | basics and there are some useful | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Really enjoying the exercises and modules. Great course to get the ball rolling on returning to (or beginning) writing. | Really enjoying the | Exercise | and modules. Great course to get | Positive | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I want to give it 3 1/2 starts - sometimes the modules seem really segmented and you spend half the time repeating the same ideas or recapping the course material (that was new that week!). While the assessment tasks were great exercises, the fact that they're peer-reviewed means that the feedback you get is often unhelpful or poorly informed. It was a good course to do, but I don't think it's really going to change anyone's life (and I would encourage people to not take the peer feedback too seriously!). | While the assessment tasks were great | Exercise | the fact that they're peer-reviewed means | Positive | 0.64 | 3.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Whether you are new to writing or looking for a new way to approach writing, take this course. The short writing exercises work so well with the video lectures. | take this course. The short writing | Exercise | work so well with the video | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 6Q6xanzkEeWUswr9_O_RKw | A lot of vocabulary, examples and exercises! | A lot of vocabulary, examples and | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good , If its more Exercise/ Assignment problems it good | Good , If its more | Exercise | Assignment problems it good | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course provides very good material.It is easy to understand.Practice exercises are very useful and challenging. | It is easy to understand. Practice | Exercise | are very useful and challenging. | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I enjoyed the way Chuck presented the course and exercises. Great job! | way Chuck presented the course and | Exercise | Great job! | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Nice course but you need to be patient while doing the exercise. | to be patient while doing the | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It will be nice to add some more extra exercises with a complete guide in the wiki section. | nice to add some more extra | Exercise | with a complete guide in the | Negative | 0.81 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A really good introduction course of Python with hands-on exercises. The tutor is really interesting, and I had great fun and sense of achievement during the course. I highly recommend it to those who want to learn Python. | introduction course of Python with hands-on | Exercise | The tutor is really interesting, and | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great tempo, explanations, and exercises.... To give 5 starts, I would have liked more assignments. | Great tempo, explanations, and | Exercise | . . . To give 5 | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course! Could be improved with more practical exercises. | Could be improved with more practical | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great teacher and easy to follow, detailed examples. More assignments or answers to exercises from the book would be helpful. | examples. More assignments or answers to | Exercise | from the book would be helpful. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well thought out sequencing of covered topics. Decent incorporation of learned capabilities in subsequent exercises. | incorporation of learned capabilities in subsequent | Exercise | | Positive | 0.81 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introductory course. Probably add more (optional) exercises to help get practise. | introductory course. Probably add more (optional) | Exercise | to help get practise. | Positive | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Makes programming not so scary. This is a great class for those that fear programming like me. Wish there were more exercises with solutions though so I could test myself some more. | like me. Wish there were more | Exercise | with solutions though so I could | Negative | 0.84 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great intro. I recommend reading the book, listening to lectures and working all exercises at the end of the chapters to get the most out of the course. | listening to lectures and working all | Exercise | at the end of the chapters | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Goes over the fundamental basics of programming quite well. One area for improvement would be more exercises and assignments. Students at this stage in beginning programming could always use more smaller exercises to solidify knowledge. Although it would seem pointless to experienced programmers coming from other languages, I think it would benefit beginners. | area for improvement would be more | Exercise | and assignments. Students at this stage | Negative | 0.65 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Goes over the fundamental basics of programming quite well. One area for improvement would be more exercises and assignments. Students at this stage in beginning programming could always use more smaller exercises to solidify knowledge. Although it would seem pointless to experienced programmers coming from other languages, I think it would benefit beginners. | programming could always use more smaller | Exercise | to solidify knowledge. Although it would | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great introductory course. Easy exercises that helps you practice and understand. | Great introductory course. Easy | Exercise | that helps you practice and understand. | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Severence does a great job of organizing the information in a manner that keeps me engaged, and knows when and how to describe common errors in logic and how to avoid/fix them. The accompanying text is similarly engaging and informative; it manages to explain quite a few concepts in each chapter, without being an overwhelming amount of information. I feel I am getting a great functional (vs. heavily theoretical) introduction to programming concepts and the Python language. The exercises have ingrained the material covered in the lectures. | concepts and the Python language. The | Exercise | have ingrained the material covered in | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Nice course. Should include more peer-reviewed exercises. Great instructor. | Nice course. Should include more peer-reviewed | Exercise | Great instructor. | Positive | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | So far so good, I recommend the course to anyone wanting a start in the programming world. Would like some other exercises to practice more. I know this would make the logistics more complex but this could be optional! | programming world. Would like some other | Exercise | to practice more. I know this | Negative | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Perfect course to start learning python. I cannot recommend this class and its professor enough. It is simple to follow, and all the quizzes and exercises truly help you learn python quickly! | follow, and all the quizzes and | Exercise | truly help you learn python quickly! | Positive | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Basic course, if you already have programming notions, this course might not be necessary. The teacher is very good and good exercises. | teacher is very good and good | Exercise | | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a very very nice course made by a funny and good teacher, the course will help you step by step on learning the basics of python by showing you explanations followed by a quiz (not really hard but very useful for the purpouse of helping the user to remember the lessons) and then by a proper exercise, the only thing i would add it would be a specific lesson on punctuation and syntax of the python lenguage becouse a couple of time i've been struggling with exercises and the problem were indentations and some punctuation. Thank you a lot mr. Chuck, coursera and the community! | lessons) and then by a proper | Exercise | the only thing i would add | Negative | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a very very nice course made by a funny and good teacher, the course will help you step by step on learning the basics of python by showing you explanations followed by a quiz (not really hard but very useful for the purpouse of helping the user to remember the lessons) and then by a proper exercise, the only thing i would add it would be a specific lesson on punctuation and syntax of the python lenguage becouse a couple of time i've been struggling with exercises and the problem were indentations and some punctuation. Thank you a lot mr. Chuck, coursera and the community! | of time i've been struggling with | Exercise | and the problem were indentations and | Negative | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I tried to learn Python 2 years ago. But I was naive and studied other courses at the same time. During this time I was also working night shifts. I had to quit all courses when I found a new job and they never amounted to anything. I am so happy that I now have found Coursera and this is my first course at Coursera. I have really enjoyed it and it has had a nice level for beginners and smart exercises which make the student really learn the skillsets previously explained in the chapter. I would also like to thank you for releasing the book in ibooks format. This was my first time trying out that format and it made the whole experience so much better and easier. Thanks again! | nice level for beginners and smart | Exercise | which make the student really learn | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to python, presented with easy to understand examples and exercises cement the concepts learned. | with easy to understand examples and | Exercise | cement the concepts learned. | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | the content and exercise are very helpful | the content and | Exercise | are very helpful | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | the last exercise is bugged (5.2 is supposed to be 5.1) | the last | Exercise | is bugged (5. 2 is supposed | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | An excellent course on learning about foundations of Python language with enough exercises to give hands on experience in implementing programs.All the lectures have been explained by Prof Charles in such a lucid manner that even a person naive to programming would grasp it easily. | foundations of Python language with enough | Exercise | to give hands on experience in | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | While the videos are a good guide, the quizzes and assignments are way too easy. I find that, whenever I am studying, finding out how to do difficult exercises are the best way to really learn. Good course | finding out how to do difficult | Exercise | are the best way to really | Positive | 0.77 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great primer for understanding the very basics of Python. You won't be able to make too much fancy stuff after this, but it's a stepping stone to great things. Dr. Chuck is a great teacher and the exercises are challenging and fun. | is a great teacher and the | Exercise | are challenging and fun. | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course for beginning, but I fell like it needs more exercises. | I fell like it needs more | Exercise | | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I really enjoy the videos describing the history of the language. The exercises were very good and the 'Office Hours' videos were lots of fun. Its really great to see how many people are interested in Python all around the world. These all provided a good foundation. I also thought it was great to be able to do the exercises and programming problems at any time. I look forward to the second course in this series. | the history of the language. The | Exercise | were very good and the 'Office | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I really enjoy the videos describing the history of the language. The exercises were very good and the 'Office Hours' videos were lots of fun. Its really great to see how many people are interested in Python all around the world. These all provided a good foundation. I also thought it was great to be able to do the exercises and programming problems at any time. I look forward to the second course in this series. | to be able to do the | Exercise | and programming problems at any time. | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Everything was great but I wish there was more exercise questions to solve, at least as a homework. could've been in the book at the end of each chapter as a chapter questions /projects. Because I believe more exercise help to understand concept better. | but I wish there was more | Exercise | questions to solve, at least as | Negative | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Everything was great but I wish there was more exercise questions to solve, at least as a homework. could've been in the book at the end of each chapter as a chapter questions /projects. Because I believe more exercise help to understand concept better. | questions /projects. Because I believe more | Exercise | help to understand concept better. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I gave five stars because the course was very easy to follow, the lectures gave a feeling of sitting in a class room and listening to the professor. Secondly, the exercises were good at making me understand the concepts. | listening to the professor. Secondly, the | Exercise | were good at making me understand | Negative | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent content, very clear and easy to understand with good examples and exercises! | to understand with good examples and | Exercise | | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great teacher, good beginner exercises, very thankful to Coursera and University of Michigan for it. | Great teacher, good beginner | Exercise | very thankful to Coursera and University | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course. Really enjoyed learning Python fundamentals. More exercises should be included as part of assignment. Thanks! | Really enjoyed learning Python fundamentals. More | Exercise | should be included as part of | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Some of the coding exercises have mistakes in them. Other than that, a great course for beginners. | Some of the coding | Exercise | have mistakes in them. Other than | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I felt unprepared for Exercise 5.2. Otherwise good. | I felt unprepared for | Exercise | 5. 2. Otherwise good. | Negative | 0.88 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course! Clear and full of examples and helpful exercises. I didn't know anything about Python and now I feel like I can really do something with it. Going to take the next courses in this specialisation - for sure!!! | and full of examples and helpful | Exercise | I didn't know anything about Python | Negative | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very nice way to start programming!!! Everything is explained properly and the exercises make you understand and remember the code. I can fully recommend this course! | Everything is explained properly and the | Exercise | make you understand and remember the | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction to Python and good challenges in the work exercises. | and good challenges in the work | Exercise | | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Rating 5 stars for teaching style. When you are largely unfamiliar with programming it is important to not skip silly steps in explanation that might seem obvious. The information was very compact with made it easily digestible and encouraging to continue to the next level. The exercises increased nicely in complexity without sudden jumps in knowledge so that it would not give the impression that you are stuck forever in the pit hole of doom ;-) | continue to the next level. The | Exercise | increased nicely in complexity without sudden | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a good course for introduction. Too simple and too little exercise. | introduction. Too simple and too little | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well developed, very clear and fast movement at the same time. Good exercises to practice. The method of teaching is encouraging and not boring at all. | movement at the same time. Good | Exercise | to practice. The method of teaching | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | There is some good material but the presentation seems a bit uneven; some parts are repeated many times at very slow speed while other parts, equally important, barely rate a word. The quizzes can be very searching and you really need to have paid close attention to every word (however quickly or slowly it passed by). I would have liked more practical exercises. The accompanying book is good and I am still looking forward to the other courses in the sequence which move further away from my limited knowledge of Python. | I would have liked more practical | Exercise | The accompanying book is good and | Positive | 0.73 | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Some more auto graded coding exercises would be very helpful. Thank you for the course! | Some more auto graded coding | Exercise | would be very helpful. Thank you | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great Professor and I really enjoyed the basic building block approach. It allowed me to learn slowly and completely while I took in all the new material. This was the perfect course for me since I had no prior programming knowledge at all. Thanks Dr. Chuck! The only suggestion I have is to provide more exercises to really cement the lessons, similar to math class back in high school where you had to do multiple problems to see for yourself how different variations of the same types of problems work out. Although I may be alone in wishing for that! | I have is to provide more | Exercise | to really cement the lessons, similar | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I liked the course. It really is a true beginners' class. I think the instructor taught well with good examples illustrating each point. I deducted a point because the exercises were too easy and there weren't enough of them. I understand that it's not easy to come up with a good grading system, but the grading system definitely could be better. | I deducted a point because the | Exercise | were too easy and there weren't | Negative | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great class for anyone who as not written code before. Well paced exercises and lectures allow non-coders to become informed about the basics. Highly recommended. | not written code before. Well paced | Exercise | and lectures allow non-coders to become | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Exercise need to be more heavy | | Exercise | need to be more heavy | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | More coding exercises, as optional for example, would be nice. Otherwise good course and guide videos. | More coding | Exercise | as optional for example, would be | Negative | 0.69 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Chuck is an entertaining, very knowledgeable guy and this course is great. The exercises aren't always as clear as I would like. Maybe more comments in the code presented in the exercises themselves could help clarify. I have and would recommend this course to anyone interested in coding. | and this course is great. The | Exercise | aren't always as clear as I | Positive | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Chuck is an entertaining, very knowledgeable guy and this course is great. The exercises aren't always as clear as I would like. Maybe more comments in the code presented in the exercises themselves could help clarify. I have and would recommend this course to anyone interested in coding. | in the code presented in the | Exercise | themselves could help clarify. I have | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for anyone who has struggled to understand how to program, especially in a self-directed/self-motivated way. This course taught by Dr. Chuck was broken down into concise simple sections that kept me interested, and I could follow along easily, with just the right amount of complexity in the quizzes and chapter exercises, so as not to discourage me. I've tried to learn computer programming using Java (inside & outside of a tertiary environment) with very limited success, but switched to learning python because it seemed more intuitive. So while i'm not a complete "novice" to programming, this course had the "Goldilocks Effect" for me. "Just right" :D | complexity in the quizzes and chapter | Exercise | so as not to discourage me. | Positive | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The explanations were very good and the exercises and assignments reinforced my understanding. | explanations were very good and the | Exercise | and assignments reinforced my understanding. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | great teacher and class; last exercise was tough! | great teacher and class; last | Exercise | was tough! | Positive | 0.77 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I learned a lot of the basics. To get the full experience, I recommend people try the exercises in the books. | experience, I recommend people try the | Exercise | in the books. | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Easy to follow and with clear exercises | Easy to follow and with clear | Exercise | | Positive | 0.97 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for the absolute beginner. I'm not an absolute beginner to programming but I am to python so I found I could skip a heck of a lot. Exercises are useful for getting into routine of writing programs and the worked exercise videos show best practice. | skip a heck of a lot. | Exercise | are useful for getting into routine | Negative | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for the absolute beginner. I'm not an absolute beginner to programming but I am to python so I found I could skip a heck of a lot. Exercises are useful for getting into routine of writing programs and the worked exercise videos show best practice. | of writing programs and the worked | Exercise | videos show best practice. | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | funny, informative, great exercises, and slow enough for newbies!! | funny, informative, great | Exercise | and slow enough for newbies! ! | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A fantastic instructor. The course delivers what it says...programming for **everybody** and **getting started** with Python. I liked the gradual way in which topics and concepts were introduced. The exercises were challenging enough to keep me interested and easy enough to solve in the end. | topics and concepts were introduced. The | Exercise | were challenging enough to keep me | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course, maybe a bit more exercises (or at least links to sources) would make it more useful | Excellent course, maybe a bit more | Exercise | (or at least links to sources) | Positive | 0.68 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I never had a programming class that covers really the base of the basics in such a deep and easy to understand way, not taking for granted many things. Professor Charles Severance has a great sense of humour (it looks like you are talking to him in person, it's not something spectacular for the camera) and very generous showing his team, amplifying knowledge through interviewing many interesting people. Exercises were very helpful to understand the chapters. Would appreciate if could have more exercises (not for grade, but for practicing). Super recommend it! | knowledge through interviewing many interesting people. | Exercise | were very helpful to understand the | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I never had a programming class that covers really the base of the basics in such a deep and easy to understand way, not taking for granted many things. Professor Charles Severance has a great sense of humour (it looks like you are talking to him in person, it's not something spectacular for the camera) and very generous showing his team, amplifying knowledge through interviewing many interesting people. Exercises were very helpful to understand the chapters. Would appreciate if could have more exercises (not for grade, but for practicing). Super recommend it! | Would appreciate if could have more | Exercise | (not for grade, but for practicing). | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This class was great!! Easy to follow and the exercises are truly for beginners!!! Thank you very much Dr. Severance for putting together this class! I'm looking forward to take the rest of them!!! | ! Easy to follow and the | Exercise | are truly for beginners! ! ! | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a course that would be helpful to complete programming novices. Any prior knowledge of programming is likely to render it useless to the student. That being said, a programming newbie should have no problem following it. The professor speaks slower than necessary. 1.75x or 2x speeds make the pace more manageable and is still easy to follow. In addition, it uses an old version of Python, which tends to make the exercises slightly annoying. | Python, which tends to make the | Exercise | slightly annoying. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I really enjoyed this course, and found it easy to keep up with the projects by setting aside one day a week. I find that the lectures move a little slowly, but simply speeding up the video time made it feel much more efficient. Following along with the e-book, I felt confident going through each of the exercises, and had a lot of fun while banging my head against the keyboard trying to figure out how to make things work (due to my own errors, not problems within the course). I'm looking forward to the next class! | confident going through each of the | Exercise | and had a lot of fun | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Chuck is entertaining and makes this course so lively. Exercises and quizzes are good; not too easy and not too hard either. Feels like I started getting Python! | and makes this course so lively. | Exercise | and quizzes are good; not too | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for beginners. Lacks sufficient exercises. | Good course for beginners. Lacks sufficient | Exercise | | Negative | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very interesting course, linear with a good teacher. i would have liked to do more exercises. | would have liked to do more | Exercise | | Negative | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well structured course which makes it easy to learn the material and includes lots of exercises to test your understanding. Assignment solutions are thoroughly discussed which makes it easier to assess the efficiency of your own code compared to the professor. | the material and includes lots of | Exercise | to test your understanding. Assignment solutions | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I loved this class. It's been over 15 years since I've been exposed to programming. I alway regretted not taking the opportunity to learn it. Now I'm getting into it, and I really like it. Even with no background in programming, I did think the class moved a little too slowly though. I finished the whole thing in less than a week and even did some additional exercises. I can't wait to start the next class! | week and even did some additional | Exercise | I can't wait to start the | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | More exercises would be nice! Overall, a very nice course. | More | Exercise | would be nice! Overall, a very | Positive | 0.69 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Managed to complete this in 2 weeks as I have quite a lot of time available. The exercises were fairly simple and easy to understand giving me a good grounding in the basics of python. | a lot of time available. The | Exercise | were fairly simple and easy to | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good explanations and Dr.Chuck makes the course fun. Exercises could probably be a bit more challenging, but it will do for absolute beginners. Thank you. | Dr. Chuck makes the course fun. | Exercise | could probably be a bit more | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction into python programming, but could be more programming exercises in this course. | programming, but could be more programming | Exercise | in this course. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content of the course is very good, useful and interesting, I greatly appreciate the knowledge delivered. But assignments could improve: -All module assignments seems mostly focalize on using Microstrategy tool. In assignments, i would like to see more exercises so that students learn through practice of business cases. For example, I prefer the way modules are organized in courses 1,2, and 3: concepts with examples, practice exercise, then assignment through similar exercise + a quiz. -In last assignment, there was no suggested solution(s) for the last question, i think this is missing for a good understanding. | i would like to see more | Exercise | so that students learn through practice | Positive | 0.84 | 3.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content of the course is very good, useful and interesting, I greatly appreciate the knowledge delivered. But assignments could improve: -All module assignments seems mostly focalize on using Microstrategy tool. In assignments, i would like to see more exercises so that students learn through practice of business cases. For example, I prefer the way modules are organized in courses 1,2, and 3: concepts with examples, practice exercise, then assignment through similar exercise + a quiz. -In last assignment, there was no suggested solution(s) for the last question, i think this is missing for a good understanding. | and 3: concepts with examples, practice | Exercise | then assignment through similar exercise + | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content of the course is very good, useful and interesting, I greatly appreciate the knowledge delivered. But assignments could improve: -All module assignments seems mostly focalize on using Microstrategy tool. In assignments, i would like to see more exercises so that students learn through practice of business cases. For example, I prefer the way modules are organized in courses 1,2, and 3: concepts with examples, practice exercise, then assignment through similar exercise + a quiz. -In last assignment, there was no suggested solution(s) for the last question, i think this is missing for a good understanding. | practice exercise, then assignment through similar | Exercise | + a quiz. -In last assignment, | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | Interesting lectures and exercises. Not only for managers, but for everyone. | Interesting lectures and | Exercise | Not only for managers, but for | Negative | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Could use more examples/pratical quantitative exercises | Could use more examples/pratical quantitative | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | very interesting and useful course. I hope that many users will find it relevant. African market and models are absent on the présentation; I appreciate the professor and the slides exercises are quite clear | appreciate the professor and the slides | Exercise | are quite clear | Positive | 0.87 | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | I really enjoyed the practical exercises of the course. However, I found the interviews mostly focused on the Italian market and it was hard to find the relevance towards a more global perspective. The lectures were quire well organized and build up slowly towards more complex theories. | I really enjoyed the practical | Exercise | of the course. However, I found | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Really nice course with a mixture of slides, presentations, interviews and exercises. I definitely suggest it. | mixture of slides, presentations, interviews and | Exercise | I definitely suggest it. | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | really very interesting! Nice lessons, powerpoint and exercises! | very interesting! Nice lessons, powerpoint and | Exercise | | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | An awesome course for the students who want to pursue a career as Private Equity Analyst. This course is an excellent overview of Private Equity and Venture Capital business model used in the field of the finance. Everything is explained very well. The presentation is kept short and informative with good slides. The exercises are interesting and fun to do. They help a lot to learn the course material. I highly recommend this course. Thank You! | and informative with good slides. The | Exercise | are interesting and fun to do. | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| 8G7jDCT-EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Excellent capstones. But it would be mush better if there would be some lectures on Kongregate with example and exercises. | lectures on Kongregate with example and | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | The course does a great job of curating very relevant videos and articles to understand digital from a 360 degree perspective. While all of us are exposed to digital from a consumer perspective, looking at it from an entrepreneur's and investors' perspectives completed the picture in my head. I liked the short video format, it is engaging and easier to schedule into our lives. Some of the readings were called "not mandatory" but were needed for answering the quiz! I would request not to have really long readings - some of them were very intensive papers written as part of an academic exercise and I will be surprised if any of the students, who are looking for many small and engaging materials would be interested in tackling really long non-man | written as part of an academic | Exercise | and I will be surprised if | Positive | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | This was a great course; very good explanations teoretical and practice, you gave us powerful tools to analyze data and took the necesary time for cover the topics. Maybe you can add in the future some exercises that we have to upload for review among each other students. Thank you very much for share this tools and your knowledge. | can add in the future some | Exercise | that we have to upload for | Positive | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | The best introduction to functional programming I've seen. The course lectures make for a smooth learning experience and the exercises in the assignments range from simple to moderately challenging and are a good complement for the lectures. | a smooth learning experience and the | Exercise | in the assignments range from simple | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I would say that prior programming knowledge would be a big advantage, otherwise it might become a copying exercise without necessarily knowing what you're doing. I like the fact that the videos show that not everything works smoothly in the sense that it's easy to make mistakes, even by Don :-) | otherwise it might become a copying | Exercise | without necessarily knowing what you're doing. | Negative | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | As other reviewers have noted, this course is NOT for beginning programmers! (Unless maybe you are a mathematical genius with total recall.) I have a little background in programming, HTML and CSS, but I found this course to be an absolute nightmare. It would be interesting to find out if any of the rave reviews came from real beginners. Most of the problems have already been noted by other reviews, so I will only mention a few that I did not see mentioned. The course requirements should include hardware and software essentials. In particular, the student has no choice but to use Android Studio. If their system is not running a 64bit OS at 2.4 GHz with at least 8 GB of RAM, it can literally take DAYS for Studio to complete the build so that the student can do anything with assignment code. There is a desperate need for a glossary. The course dives in with more acronyms than the military, and assumes the attmpting learner already has a handle on APIs, SDKs, etc., not to mention many other technical terms (interfaces, ...). If I asked the average programmer to evaluate the MT based on comparisons with the Complutensian Polyglot and Codex Alexandricus, the effect would probably be about the same. Another glaring omission for beginners is a battery of exercises for each concept/skill. As for "We've organized all these topics into units that represent roughly 4-6 hours of work each," that is absurd! If you multiplied that by 10, it would still be a stretch. I have no doubt about the programming and technical competence of the instructors (though there are some errors in a number of the instructions). And I'm sure they are very nice people who really want others to learn. The root problem seems to be what professional communicators call "The Curse of Knowledge" -- a syndrome in which a person is so familiar with their subject that they cannot begin to imagine what it is like for someone who is not. My recommendation to a beginner is to look somewhere else. Take a good introductory course in Java before diving into the vastly more complex world of the Android environment. I am not qualified to evaluate the course from the perspective of an experienced programmer, but I have noted that they are frustrated by clutter caused by token attempts to make this a beginner course. My recommendation to the faculty is to completely re-engineer this whole specialization. They should have a separate set of courses truly designed for beginners, and they should get help from qualified instructional designers who specialize in online adult education. (Might not be a bad idea to get the VU English department to review the lecture text as well.) My recommendation to anyone is to never believe anything Coursera tells you about a course. Audit the course BEFORE you pay any money! This is especially important if the course has not actually started. This course started two months late, and I could not get a refund before the course even got under way! After taking nearly 6 months to wade through a little over half the course requirements, I decided to look at the rest of the assignments and project. This removed all doubt that to continue was a hopeless waste of time. So, I decided to end the nightmare, and I'm glad it's over! | for beginners is a battery of | Exercise | for each concept/skill. As for " | Positive | 0.81 | 1.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Good course in general but it could use more exercises and solutions for those exercises. It could be a great course in future Also, sometimes it's confusing like you are asked to download code and write it along with the video but the files already (at least partially) contain the code that you should write and it looks quite different from the video. | general but it could use more | Exercise | and solutions for those exercises. It | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Good course in general but it could use more exercises and solutions for those exercises. It could be a great course in future Also, sometimes it's confusing like you are asked to download code and write it along with the video but the files already (at least partially) contain the code that you should write and it looks quite different from the video. | more exercises and solutions for those | Exercise | It could be a great course | Positive | 0.83 | 3.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Excellent scaffolding of exercises to provide a broad intro aspects of character development. Enjoyable, meaningful, and great teaching methodology! | Excellent scaffolding of | Exercise | to provide a broad intro aspects | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Great Course, highly recommended, great explanations and nice ideas to help you think diffently about level and world design, concise and clear and has creative exercises. Loved it. | concise and clear and has creative | Exercise | Loved it. | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | great class, enjoyed the videos and readings, wish they had more examples and exercises with excel | wish they had more examples and | Exercise | with excel | Negative | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | I did like the course BUT when you make the "exercises" and post something on the forums... OMG... Huge mistake... you start getting replies of EVERYTHING so... you can have 20 emails a day because other people are doing their "exercises" and posting on the forum, the worst is that is no way to turn off those.... | BUT when you make the " | Exercise | and post something on the forums. | Negative | 0.63 | 3.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | I did like the course BUT when you make the "exercises" and post something on the forums... OMG... Huge mistake... you start getting replies of EVERYTHING so... you can have 20 emails a day because other people are doing their "exercises" and posting on the forum, the worst is that is no way to turn off those.... | other people are doing their " | Exercise | and posting on the forum, the | Positive | 0.69 | 3.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Very nice starting point for personal branding. Encourages self-reflection and awareness via a few exercises. Touches upon social media presence and use. Very helpfull in building your personal brand. | self-reflection and awareness via a few | Exercise | Touches upon social media presence and | Positive | 0.89 | 4.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very clear ideia about strategy and it so well design (and taught) that you think you are dealing and learning a basic and simple thing but as soon as you start doing the exercises you see how challenging are the questions and reasoning behind it. | soon as you start doing the | Exercise | you see how challenging are the | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | This is a very good course especially the exercises which are taught in the class. The homework is very challenging! | a very good course especially the | Exercise | which are taught in the class. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Great Job. It is really a wonderful course. I has very useful information and practice exercises. The book also is easy to read and understood . Thanks so much for this course. Thanks for all instructors and mentors reply on forum. They were always there for support. I hope you can arrange another series of this course for advanced programming. | has very useful information and practice | Exercise | The book also is easy to | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Brilliant introductory course with very well prepared exercises. The automated testing file was of immense help. Managed to get the knowledge into place, which makes my future PhD work with matlab much easier | introductory course with very well prepared | Exercise | The automated testing file was of | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Great homework exercises. Really enjoyed solving them. | Great homework | Exercise | Really enjoyed solving them. | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | I really enjoy the course. It helped me to know and understand how to use MATLAB in a basic way. This course will strength your MATLAB skill with a lot of assignments. The longer you go, the harder exercises but I believe that's a good way to learn. | The longer you go, the harder | Exercise | but I believe that's a good | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | The course is oriented to alumni that have a minimal experience with design concept refreshing and updating know how with interesting information sharing with the classmates. The pratical exercises helps to consolidate technics and expertise. | sharing with the classmates. The pratical | Exercise | helps to consolidate technics and expertise. | Positive | 0.93 | 3.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I didn't find the overall content of the course very well chosen for an introduction to philosophy - since it covers so little. The title of this course should have been "An Introduction to Just a Couple of Topics in Philosophy." And there are so few philosophers covered. However, the biggest problem was instructor Alasdair Richmond, whose response to debate was locking threads down every time his ideological positions were challenged. He showed himself completely inept to have a debate with more than one course participant and chose to censor a variety of viewpoints he dislikes. It was particularly ironic to see an instructor exercise censorship in a Philosophy course - a domain whose objective, after all, is the pursuit of truth as well as to ask and debate the "why" of everything! A petty tyrant does not make a good teacher. Should I ever meet anyone interested in studying Philosophy, my first recommendation to them will be stay away from the University of Edinburgh, since there is no respect for debate, freedom of expression, or inquiry there. | particularly ironic to see an instructor | Exercise | censorship in a Philosophy course - | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| aySVfHahEeWYyRL_9oqa4Q | really interesting, it offers a lot of information about meetings, vocabulary, exercises. | lot of information about meetings, vocabulary, | Exercise | | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Very good course. Very good introduction to some interesting concepts in software security. Well explained. Maybe introduce more practical exercises. They could also include references to places where you can practice the concepts learned. For example repositories as vulnhub and others are sites where you can put into practice exercises. It however is a course that is very well explained ... | Well explained. Maybe introduce more practical | Exercise | They could also include references to | Negative | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Very good course. Very good introduction to some interesting concepts in software security. Well explained. Maybe introduce more practical exercises. They could also include references to places where you can practice the concepts learned. For example repositories as vulnhub and others are sites where you can put into practice exercises. It however is a course that is very well explained ... | where you can put into practice | Exercise | It however is a course that | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | I liked the topics and syllabus. But I can not say that, I liked the lectures 100%. I was looking for more clear and easy to understand lectures. Besides, I was hoping to have more exercises in order to know the subjects in depth. Is it possible to add more homework for the students? | I was hoping to have more | Exercise | in order to know the subjects | Negative | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good course. My only negative remark is that I really missed the swirl exercises that were available for the other courses of this specialization. | that I really missed the swirl | Exercise | that were available for the other | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | The level of this course is a lot higher than the other courses. The course contains a lot of material and exercises which makes it hard to finish the course within the time period of one month. Nevertheless did I like Brian's way of teaching. He's a perfectionist and takes his time to explain everything in detail. I really liked the challenge, 5 stars. | contains a lot of material and | Exercise | which makes it hard to finish | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | I had a lot of fun in this course. The exercises in the text and quizzes help me understand the concepts | of fun in this course. The | Exercise | in the text and quizzes help | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course will give you a good basic foundation in regression models. However, do be prepared to do a good amount of work besides just viewing the videos. I would recommend at the very least to go through the exercises in the 'recommended textbook' to gain a better understanding. | very least to go through the | Exercise | in the 'recommended textbook' to gain | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| b75Wh7MYEeWKaQ6n__gsuQ | This course is extremely basic. Its planning is best summed up: “Just show them a memo, have the participants write one, and boom, success!” That one small, peer-evaluated exercise is not worth the fee. | success! ” That one small, peer-evaluated | Exercise | is not worth the fee. | Negative | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Great course. One drawback: exercises are not oriented towards actions | Great course. One drawback: | Exercise | are not oriented towards actions | Positive | 0.88 | 4.0 |
| BJXF0TLTEeSasiIACxClrQ | Super course, clear in the theoretical analysis, good practice quizzes and interesting virtual lab exercises. | practice quizzes and interesting virtual lab | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| BJXF0TLTEeSasiIACxClrQ | I find that this course is very well organized, clear and useful for those who are interested in Physical Chemistry. The theoretical concepts are explained step by step, through mathematical equations and practical exercises. I have particularly appreciated the virtual labs and the computer simulations, because I found them very challenging and helpful to understand the application of concepts. Since the topics (Thermodinamics, Chemical Kinetics, and Quantum Chemistry) are fundamentals to really understand Chemistry, I strongly recommend this course. Raffaele Pescitelli | step, through mathematical equations and practical | Exercise | I have particularly appreciated the virtual | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Plenty of information on various aspects of typography presented in detail and in a comrehensive manner, as well as engaging exercises really boost your knowledge and broaden your design horizons! | comrehensive manner, as well as engaging | Exercise | really boost your knowledge and broaden | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | I found this course very well organized and executed. There was clarity and focus in the lectures, and the exercises, should one apply themselves, proved a great space for putting things in practice, in a progressive and meaningful way. | focus in the lectures, and the | Exercise | should one apply themselves, proved a | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | You´re missing more practise exercises so we can study!! | You´re missing more practise | Exercise | so we can study! ! | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | A well built course, with clear lessons and good exercises that really make the students think and learn about finance subjects. | course, with clear lessons and good | Exercise | that really make the students think | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Enjoyable and informative. The assignments were workable, though they were not always super-well coordinated with the course material. The in-lecture exercises are of uneven quality. The course material is obviously spliced together from other sources in places. All this notwithstanding, the lectures are interesting, and the exercises help a lot to cement in the concepts. As an experienced programmer, but a newcomer to functional techniques, this was satisfying. I'm aware that the other courses in this sequence suffer from similar issues to what I outlined, but I'm moving ahead anyway. | with the course material. The in-lecture | Exercise | are of uneven quality. The course | Negative | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Enjoyable and informative. The assignments were workable, though they were not always super-well coordinated with the course material. The in-lecture exercises are of uneven quality. The course material is obviously spliced together from other sources in places. All this notwithstanding, the lectures are interesting, and the exercises help a lot to cement in the concepts. As an experienced programmer, but a newcomer to functional techniques, this was satisfying. I'm aware that the other courses in this sequence suffer from similar issues to what I outlined, but I'm moving ahead anyway. | the lectures are interesting, and the | Exercise | help a lot to cement in | Positive | 0.88 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good and interesting course certainly provides a good level of foundation for functional programming. The exercises are challenging and it did take me longer then 3 hour to complete the course work. Further I had to revisit the videos and get the additional reading materials. | of foundation for functional programming. The | Exercise | are challenging and it did take | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | High level course. Exercises are academic of nature. You might need more time to finish the exercises. I appreciate that this is a well formed course. | High level course. | Exercise | are academic of nature. You might | Positive | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | High level course. Exercises are academic of nature. You might need more time to finish the exercises. I appreciate that this is a well formed course. | need more time to finish the | Exercise | I appreciate that this is a | Positive | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The assignments are so much fun and professor Odersky really explained all the concepts well! I also love the exercises too! | concepts well! I also love the | Exercise | too! | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good course, learnt quite a lot even as someone with some existing experience of Scala. The exercises were challenging but not too difficult and the estimated completion time is pretty much spot on. Just a shame that the automatic grader and verification systems are less than reliable on some of the exercises. | some existing experience of Scala. The | Exercise | were challenging but not too difficult | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good course, learnt quite a lot even as someone with some existing experience of Scala. The exercises were challenging but not too difficult and the estimated completion time is pretty much spot on. Just a shame that the automatic grader and verification systems are less than reliable on some of the exercises. | than reliable on some of the | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great Instructor and challenging problems. The exercises help to reinforce the ideas presented in the lessons and the weekly assignments force you to use the skills. I will say that the programming assignments seemed a bit harder than they needed to be to help reinforce the ideas. | Great Instructor and challenging problems. The | Exercise | help to reinforce the ideas presented | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Amazing introduction into FP. Very helpful and interesting material and test exercises. | helpful and interesting material and test | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | This is one of the best, terse, no fluff, and amazing courses that I have encountered on Coursera, with a few mind-bending exercises to test the student. (Although I have some experience with mid-level Haskell so I am sure that helped a bit with the exercises) Scala is a big language and Prof. Odersky showcases his intuition of connecting the topics which work, and gives a gentle introduction without overwhelming the student. I have only good things to say about this course. 5 stars. | on Coursera, with a few mind-bending | Exercise | to test the student. (Although I | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | This is one of the best, terse, no fluff, and amazing courses that I have encountered on Coursera, with a few mind-bending exercises to test the student. (Although I have some experience with mid-level Haskell so I am sure that helped a bit with the exercises) Scala is a big language and Prof. Odersky showcases his intuition of connecting the topics which work, and gives a gentle introduction without overwhelming the student. I have only good things to say about this course. 5 stars. | that helped a bit with the | Exercise | Scala is a big language and | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Covers fundamental theory well and examples and exercises are chosen well to make it practical. | fundamental theory well and examples and | Exercise | are chosen well to make it | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Fantastic teaching and some very challenging exercises! It gives you a really great tool kit and some very useful source to refer to. Very good fun and a big thank you to the team at EPFL. | Fantastic teaching and some very challenging | Exercise | It gives you a really great | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great course about functional programming and Scala. The lectures are well constructed and well explained with some exercises in between. The sound is unfortunately sometimes low, but I used headphones for that. The assignments are challenging and help you deepen your knowledge effectively. However, the forum is not very lively. You might not find it difficult to do assignments on your own. I suggest to use StackOverflow in that case. It is not taught how to do debugging, though this course is not meant for beginners I think, and as such probably understanding and debugging a Scala program might be expected to be learned autonomously. | constructed and well explained with some | Exercise | in between. The sound is unfortunately | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The synopsis for the course claims you need previous programming experience << You should have at least one year programming experience. Proficiency with Java or C# is ideal, but experience with other languages such as C/C++, Python, Javascript or Ruby is also sufficient.>> I don't really have any experience in any of these languages except perhaps C from many years ago. However, I do have experience in Lisp and I found that the languages are extremely similar. In many cases I could think in Lisp and write in Scala, which is sort of like Lisp with type annotations, not always, but often. There are a couple of places in the course where the author assumes you know java. I think this is a mistake. You basically need to know the names of some java methods to work the exercise. But I just asked in the forum and someone gave me the correct method names. | some java methods to work the | Exercise | But I just asked in the | Negative | 0.85 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The assignments and exercises are very well thought out and are extremely helpful for us as students. | The assignments and | Exercise | are very well thought out and | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Though learning deeply a language is always a challenge, this lecture focuses on constructs that makes Scala functions and exhibits good exercises to use recursions and functions. This is, I think a good start to become a good scala developer | makes Scala functions and exhibits good | Exercise | to use recursions and functions. This | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Specially on the last exercise, there is a bit of a distance between the classes and the challenges. Other than that, the course provides a very good introduction to functional programming at the same time as it introduce the scala language constructs and api. | Specially on the last | Exercise | there is a bit of a | Positive | 0.87 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good materials and challenging programming exercises. Makes you think. However some material is old and some new, so little confusing. Especially when going through the materials about installing the development environment. | Good materials and challenging programming | Exercise | Makes you think. However some material | Positive | 0.81 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Excellent course. It's good to already know how to program in some C-like language before you start, as the exercises are reasonably challenging. | language before you start, as the | Exercise | are reasonably challenging. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | interesting course with different typer of exercises! | interesting course with different typer of | Exercise | | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very interesting course and good information. Could you more explanation and exercises to bridge gaps for those that are new to the field. | information. Could you more explanation and | Exercise | to bridge gaps for those that | Negative | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| bVgqTevEEeWvGQrWsIkLlw | This is an excellent course that captures many different text mining techniques. It requires some math knowledge in numerical analysis and probability in order to understand the concepts. I gave 4 star rating due to 2 problems during the course: 1) Lack of examples along the formulas and principles. There are some, but many concepts could be adopted much faster if examples were introduced right along with them. 2) The optional programming exercises are easy to complete, but the environment is very confusing to set it up. | with them. 2) The optional programming | Exercise | are easy to complete, but the | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| bVgqTevEEeWvGQrWsIkLlw | Too much theory, not enough practical exercises and too few examples of how the algorithms work. | Too much theory, not enough practical | Exercise | and too few examples of how | Negative | 0.95 | 2.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | It had been a while, and I really enjoyed rediscovering the series through this course, whether by watching the videos -providing intuitions, main points, key notions, and concrete examples (every-day-life ones and mathematical ones, as a particularly appreciated example, see the bridge video) given by an enthusiastic mathematician- or by following his related mooculus book -providing formal course materials (but you can still picture the professor explaining things to you, which is really enjoyable) including all the definitions, theorems, and justifications, and a lot of exercises with their answers, completing gracefully the videos. I truly hope that, in future coming courses, I will have the opportunity to have this professor dealing with other subjects -like integrals (on non-bounded domains) or function series- that can be related and used, afterwards, with series through dedicated theorems. | and justifications, and a lot of | Exercise | with their answers, completing gracefully the | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A lot of info is packed into this course. I have some JavaScript background so it helped. If you have none, you should start on an earlier course. Loved the exercises...challenging but not out of reach! Would take another course from this Instructor. | on an earlier course. Loved the | Exercise | . . challenging but not out | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very detailed and accessible presentation of educational material, excellent examples and exercises. A lot of excellent educational material for additional saomstoyatelnogo study. Homework creative and complex. For that thank you very much. I would like to have another very large rate of in-depth study of javascript | of educational material, excellent examples and | Exercise | A lot of excellent educational material | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very well explained, but it should have been called "Basic Javascript" because I'm sure many topics are missing. Moreover, the lecturer kept on saying "Now stop and write some code" but it's pretty hard to imagine a code from scratch, so I would suggest having (many) more exercises. (The existing ones were also very simple) | I would suggest having (many) more | Exercise | (The existing ones were also very | Positive | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great teacher. Great approach. I love the peer review exercises. | approach. I love the peer review | Exercise | | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | every well explained. simple and to the point examples and exercises. | and to the point examples and | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is beneficial for a person who wants to write well or to pursue career in writing. The teacher is very good. The course is very informative and productive. She prepared the course very well. Assignments and exercises will help you to learn things easily. Each and every second of lecture is worth to listen and they are very precise also. The professor has provided useful material which you can read later. I'm so glad that I took this course. | the course very well. Assignments and | Exercise | will help you to learn things | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very well-organized, very clear and straight to the point. All the materials and exercises are really useful. | the point. All the materials and | Exercise | are really useful. | Negative | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This was a very good class and helpful. I only had some issues with not being able to see some things on my app like the practice exercises. | on my app like the practice | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is fantastic because it´s helping me to remember some rules in punctuation, and I can understand easy and practice exercises. Thanks | I can understand easy and practice | Exercise | Thanks | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | excellent course, easy to follow , well explained, and the exercises focus on the material being reviewed, also the practice exercises reinforce the material. Thank you. | follow , well explained, and the | Exercise | focus on the material being reviewed, | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | excellent course, easy to follow , well explained, and the exercises focus on the material being reviewed, also the practice exercises reinforce the material. Thank you. | material being reviewed, also the practice | Exercise | reinforce the material. Thank you. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Since the beginning to the end, I enjoyed this course because I learn new things for me. It had good explanations, nice examples and many exercises. Thank you very much. | good explanations, nice examples and many | Exercise | Thank you very much. | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | i enjoyed taking this mooc. very well structured and straight on the points and details. plenty of practice exercises. i recommend!!! | points and details. plenty of practice | Exercise | i recommend! ! ! | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The course is well structured, but most of the features in the exercises' pages were not working properly. I tried to access them via both my computer (macbook) and mobile phone, but in some cases I could not even complete the exercise or check the answers... | most of the features in the | Exercise | pages were not working properly. I | Negative | 0.69 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The course is well structured, but most of the features in the exercises' pages were not working properly. I tried to access them via both my computer (macbook) and mobile phone, but in some cases I could not even complete the exercise or check the answers... | I could not even complete the | Exercise | or check the answers. . . | Negative | 0.98 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Everything is fine so far, but I'd have had more exercises to work out. | far, but I'd have had more | Exercise | to work out. | Negative | 0.69 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I really enjoy practicing with this course. It contains clear explanations and a good variety of practice exercises. | and a good variety of practice | Exercise | | Positive | 0.84 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The adequate explanations about clauses and the exercises linked to each chapter brought me a lot of confidence in my English writing. | adequate explanations about clauses and the | Exercise | linked to each chapter brought me | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The course is well-structured and very easy to follow, also, the large amount of exercises helps to remember everything. Thank you for very effective teaching! | follow, also, the large amount of | Exercise | helps to remember everything. Thank you | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Method simple, clear, and incredibly effective! Exercises are appropriate and links to external material are really useful. I totally recommend! | Method simple, clear, and incredibly effective! | Exercise | are appropriate and links to external | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good, But I missed some more practical exercises on writing. For us, non-native english speakers sometimes it is very difficult to identify our mistakes. But the whole module is very good. | But I missed some more practical | Exercise | on writing. For us, non-native english | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Could have more exercises for the ones who still is saving up to pay for it. | Could have more | Exercise | for the ones who still is | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very simple and easy to follow instructions. The lessons, exercises, and peer reviews are all interesting. I learned so much from this module. Thank you! | easy to follow instructions. The lessons, | Exercise | and peer reviews are all interesting. | Positive | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is really helpful especially for people wanting to write English articles better. The course outline is well laid out, videos are easy to understand, and exercises are very helpful for practicing your punctuation. The only negative point for me is how the teachers use a very strong American accent that some of the letters in a word are not pronounced anymore, like 'meanin' instead of 'meaning' and 'writin' instead of 'writing'. It doesn't really affect the teaching, though. All in all, this course helped me a lot and I recommend it to anyone wanting to improve their punctuation and review their English grammar knowledge. | videos are easy to understand, and | Exercise | are very helpful for practicing your | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I think it is really necessary to establish better the target auditory for this course. The students with very basic level of English have to study with advanced non-native speakers and with natives. The exercises can be too challenging for the first category, sometimes boring for the second and absolutely superfluous for the third. | non-native speakers and with natives. The | Exercise | can be too challenging for the | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | There's some room for improvement, that's for sure. The last video was really bad, not because of the content, but because the Professor was very sloppy in her speaking. I also think there should be more practice exercises and a better way to know if the answers were correct. But overall, was very happy with it. | think there should be more practice | Exercise | and a better way to know | Negative | 0.81 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A great way to recap on your grammar and punctuation. Helps all writers on sentence structure and sentence variety. The quizzes and exercises are a great way to practice. | and sentence variety. The quizzes and | Exercise | are a great way to practice. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I really liked the course, the way I could do the exercises, and the way that the themes were presented. Thank you! | the way I could do the | Exercise | and the way that the themes | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good Course for examining some English Grammar closely The course breaks down some aspects of English grammar and punctuation very nicely and has relevant practice exercises. I wish the course covered a slightly wider variety of topics or went into slightly more depth of explanation. The title "grammar and punctuation" is misleading in that only a few topics are covered. However, I believe someone learning English or reviewing academic writing would definitely benefit from going through this course. I am a native speaker, and I certainly learned a few things. :) Thank you Professor, TA's and Coursera! | very nicely and has relevant practice | Exercise | I wish the course covered a | Positive | 0.94 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I found this course very helpful and useful. I would add only one thing: more graduated exercises.Thank you for it. | add only one thing: more graduated | Exercise | Thank you for it. | Negative | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very clear information and good exercises to practice. | Very clear information and good | Exercise | to practice. | Positive | 0.71 | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I loved the way the exercises work, especially the interaction with other students. And also, the topics they manage are really helpful, and the way they explain them, with keywords, are really useful in practice. Love it, will make the next specialization course =D | I loved the way the | Exercise | work, especially the interaction with other | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good clear examination of basic punctuation and grammar. The lectures are well presented and the exercises useful. The element which really doesn't work is the peer assessment or review. This seems intended to replace forum discussions but it is not a good substitute (and there are no forums). | lectures are well presented and the | Exercise | useful. The element which really doesn't | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I enjoyed this course very much. Going into this course, my goal was to review English grammar and improve my writing. After finishing it, I feel like I accomplished that goal. I enjoyed concise and clear style of the videos and clarity of examples given in them. Assignments and exercises, although challenging at times, were of comfortable length and fun to do. Personally, this course helped me to become aware of the sentences I write, and gave me the tools to revise and edit my writings more efficiently on my own. | examples given in them. Assignments and | Exercise | although challenging at times, were of | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Excellent resource with practical exercise to improve your English on grammar and punctuation. | Excellent resource with practical | Exercise | to improve your English on grammar | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is a good overview of the basics. I enjoyed the practice exercises and interaction with fellow "classmates". | the basics. I enjoyed the practice | Exercise | and interaction with fellow " classmates" | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The course is great to improve your writing! If you love grammar, try it and you'll be surprised with the efficient between explanations and exercises. Congratulations for the creativity for teaching grammar rules. :) Cheers. | with the efficient between explanations and | Exercise | Congratulations for the creativity for teaching | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is Concise and give you what it promises you. Have lots of comprehensive exercises which are really helpful. I highly recommend it for anyone who has a moderate to severe doubt about English Grammar and Punctuation. | promises you. Have lots of comprehensive | Exercise | which are really helpful. I highly | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Great course, with extensive exercises and relevant questions and follow up. | Great course, with extensive | Exercise | and relevant questions and follow up. | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course provides basic and necessary grammar for academic essay writings. Tutor is fantastic, and exercises are interactive and interesting. | essay writings. Tutor is fantastic, and | Exercise | are interactive and interesting. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's comprehensible course with helpful exercises :) | It's comprehensible course with helpful | Exercise | :) | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Well designed and neatly structured. Lots of useful information in short time. Mixture of videos, exercises and quizzes was fun, and peers interaction was invigorating. | in short time. Mixture of videos, | Exercise | and quizzes was fun, and peers | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I would have liked some more depth in the course. While the course name says "punctuation", it deals only with commas and to a small extent, with semicolons. The assignments and practice exercises need to be tougher. Also, given that this course is taken by students from all over the globe, it should mention that the "serial comma" is not mandatory in all writing styles. | with semicolons. The assignments and practice | Exercise | need to be tougher. Also, given | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is basic yet informative. A great refresher course with a lot of resources and practice exercises. | a lot of resources and practice | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | awesome experiance ,good explanations but it would be better if you provide more time to do exercises | you provide more time to do | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A great and fun way to learn fundamentals of programming and basics of HTML, CSS, and Java Script. Exercises were simple and very good to reinforce what was learned on each session, plus they included challenge exercises for those who need something a little less basic. | of HTML, CSS, and Java Script. | Exercise | were simple and very good to | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A great and fun way to learn fundamentals of programming and basics of HTML, CSS, and Java Script. Exercises were simple and very good to reinforce what was learned on each session, plus they included challenge exercises for those who need something a little less basic. | each session, plus they included challenge | Exercise | for those who need something a | Positive | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is super awesome! Eye opening concepts and plenty of exercises to drill down the concepts learned, for a complete beginner like myself, the problems and materials provided are sure to set you in the right mental direction. I loved the emphasis on problem solving, which is key in the field. | Eye opening concepts and plenty of | Exercise | to drill down the concepts learned, | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The javascript section was very good and helped me develop my programming skills. I really like the seven step approach and using it work through the exercises. The HTML and CSS sections were not very useful though. | and using it work through the | Exercise | The HTML and CSS sections were | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course. Amazing exercises. Really a warm-up course for someone who is willing to begin his/her programming journey. Finally the instructors were more than friendly. | Great course. Amazing | Exercise | Really a warm-up course for someone | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome programming exercises | Awesome programming | Exercise | | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Everything apart from Steganography was well explained with examples. I liked that the quizzes were fairly engaging and required programming exercises to familiarize you with the content. | were fairly engaging and required programming | Exercise | to familiarize you with the content. | Positive | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good examples -- good basic instruction in videos, but most of the value is in working the exercises which use some fairly interesting real world scenarios. And some of the direction is as vague as specs you might encounter as well. | the value is in working the | Exercise | which use some fairly interesting real | Positive | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It was so great and I learned a lot through practical exercise . | I learned a lot through practical | Exercise | . | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course! The programming exercises are will planned to reinforce the concepts learnt in the video lectures. | Good course! The programming | Exercise | are will planned to reinforce the | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The topics are neatly organized and the exercises are challenging. I would like to thank all the instructors for this great course. | topics are neatly organized and the | Exercise | are challenging. I would like to | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Very well-taught, and the exercises supported the didactic teaching. I wish the next course in the specialization started today! | Very well-taught, and the | Exercise | supported the didactic teaching. I wish | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | In my opinion, the video lectures are phenomenal. Scott Klemmer does such a great job of created simple visuals to convey concepts. And he also has bulleted content that is very succinct. The exercises, too, are the right balance of challenging and fun. | content that is very succinct. The | Exercise | too, are the right balance of | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | I had a fantastic time undergoing this course. Having been in the field for over a decade, I have the experience of doing all this, but to learn it all over again and to reinforce the design basics was a fun exercise I would highly recommend. | the design basics was a fun | Exercise | I would highly recommend. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | I missed more pratical exercises about it. | I missed more pratical | Exercise | about it. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Dry principles without real life examples and exercises. You can passed the quiz by just reading online or have basic project management experience. Disappointed. | principles without real life examples and | Exercise | You can passed the quiz by | Positive | 0.78 | 2.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Before attending this course, I was really "lost" in the online travel distribution world with the feeling of falling behind in knowledge. Once I started the course, I got a very clear, structured and practical way of understanding what's happening in hotel distribution, apply acquired skills in quizzes, exercises and real-life examples and assignments and be prepared to assist or consult hotel managers on how to handle such issues. | distribution, apply acquired skills in quizzes, | Exercise | and real-life examples and assignments and | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | the hotel industry. And analyzing the | Exercise | I realized it was necessary to | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | not feeling safe to do the | Exercise | However, there was no demonstration by | Negative | 0.99 | 3.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | time, I could better perform the | Exercise | But rather it was the result | Negative | 0.84 | 3.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I would prefer if the course lasted 6 weeks so we can get a better understanding in theory and practice every single bit of the code. It was a nice ride in general and I liked it. The last exercise was hard, it could have been a little easier. | and I liked it. The last | Exercise | was hard, it could have been | Negative | 0.77 | 3.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Well thought and developed financial accounting course. The lectures and readings are interesting and the exercises help you to understand your progress. Very useful, mainly for people without financial accounting knowledge or people that want to refresh their knowledge on the subject. | and readings are interesting and the | Exercise | help you to understand your progress. | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Great intro programme to Accounting and good practical exercise for business entrepreneurs! | programme to Accounting and good practical | Exercise | for business entrepreneurs! | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great opportunity to ensure you really understand the clients needs. Fun exercises and interesting lectures | really understand the clients needs. Fun | Exercise | and interesting lectures | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I don't know how useful the ambiguous requirements exercise is when we only have one-way feedback. I also think that the ambiguous requirements exercise is the most important of the course, and the exercise missed the mark. I would suggest you structure that exercise as a dialogue, where a PM is working with the customer to elicit requirements, and not give us a big long wish-list of functionality. Structured as a dialogue, you can show that a PM would ask, "You said that the game would make noise. When is the first time it makes noise? How often would game noises be made? Does it ever stop? What makes it stop? Why even have the game make noise in the first place? Are there different noises made during the course of game play/" So, I can't recommend this particular course, and I'm concerned about what the capstone will look like if you give us an assignment where we're to make sense of functionality delivered as a block of text . | know how useful the ambiguous requirements | Exercise | is when we only have one-way | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I don't know how useful the ambiguous requirements exercise is when we only have one-way feedback. I also think that the ambiguous requirements exercise is the most important of the course, and the exercise missed the mark. I would suggest you structure that exercise as a dialogue, where a PM is working with the customer to elicit requirements, and not give us a big long wish-list of functionality. Structured as a dialogue, you can show that a PM would ask, "You said that the game would make noise. When is the first time it makes noise? How often would game noises be made? Does it ever stop? What makes it stop? Why even have the game make noise in the first place? Are there different noises made during the course of game play/" So, I can't recommend this particular course, and I'm concerned about what the capstone will look like if you give us an assignment where we're to make sense of functionality delivered as a block of text . | also think that the ambiguous requirements | Exercise | is the most important of the | Positive | 0.98 | 1.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I don't know how useful the ambiguous requirements exercise is when we only have one-way feedback. I also think that the ambiguous requirements exercise is the most important of the course, and the exercise missed the mark. I would suggest you structure that exercise as a dialogue, where a PM is working with the customer to elicit requirements, and not give us a big long wish-list of functionality. Structured as a dialogue, you can show that a PM would ask, "You said that the game would make noise. When is the first time it makes noise? How often would game noises be made? Does it ever stop? What makes it stop? Why even have the game make noise in the first place? Are there different noises made during the course of game play/" So, I can't recommend this particular course, and I'm concerned about what the capstone will look like if you give us an assignment where we're to make sense of functionality delivered as a block of text . | important of the course, and the | Exercise | missed the mark. I would suggest | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I don't know how useful the ambiguous requirements exercise is when we only have one-way feedback. I also think that the ambiguous requirements exercise is the most important of the course, and the exercise missed the mark. I would suggest you structure that exercise as a dialogue, where a PM is working with the customer to elicit requirements, and not give us a big long wish-list of functionality. Structured as a dialogue, you can show that a PM would ask, "You said that the game would make noise. When is the first time it makes noise? How often would game noises be made? Does it ever stop? What makes it stop? Why even have the game make noise in the first place? Are there different noises made during the course of game play/" So, I can't recommend this particular course, and I'm concerned about what the capstone will look like if you give us an assignment where we're to make sense of functionality delivered as a block of text . | I would suggest you structure that | Exercise | as a dialogue, where a PM | Negative | 0.64 | 1.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | Definitely learned a lot but the exercises could have been a bit more involved. It's also too easy to get away with submitting blank essays, but I suppose that's to the loss of the student. | Definitely learned a lot but the | Exercise | could have been a bit more | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| eGUHRneUEeWtpg5GoAM5Iw | Very good course. The only thing that i'd like to mention is that sometimes the enunciate of the exercises is not so clear. | that sometimes the enunciate of the | Exercise | is not so clear. | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| EH0q6oysEeWIbw4397jVQw | I thoroughly enjoyed this course. The lecturer (Dave Underwood) has a relaxed and engaging style. He made it interesting and I felt I've learnt quite a bit in a short space of time. Recommend doing the optional exercises to practice what you learn as you go. | of time. Recommend doing the optional | Exercise | to practice what you learn as | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | The assignments are not really commensurate to the content, i.e. they are much simpler and superficial and do not really test the content, which is deeper and implies practical activities difficult to measure. The title is also partially misleading, at least for me, and I would rather call it a blues introduction to jazz improvisation. But the content and the exercises proposed are great, one of the best and no nonsense approach to bebop improvisation I've ever found | improvisation. But the content and the | Exercise | proposed are great, one of the | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | This a formidable course that has given me a thourough understanding of jazz harmony, of the development of jazz harmonic language exemplified by the blues, and a plethora of practical exercises, both ear training and (primarily keyboard) playing. The play-along tracks are very useful, too, and last, but not least, it was wonderful to listen to the talented young jazz music students, who demonstrated various aspects of the subjects taught. | blues, and a plethora of practical | Exercise | both ear training and (primarily keyboard) | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | As a professional Instructional Designer, I can attest that this is the poorest-designed course I have ever seen. Regrettably, I paid for the entire specialization up-front, and I cannot get a refund or even a Coursera credit for enrolling in a different specialization. Be aware that the faculty who is the instructor of record does not participate in the course. The video lectures are poorly done, including errors and misstatements that could have been edited out, but it appears that no one bothered to edit the raw footage before uploading it. There is not so much instruction as an overview. There are no coding exercises until the final assignment, which is poorly-described and requires the student to self-teach using outside sources. There are app specializations in Coursera that appear much better-designed. Look elsewhere. | an overview. There are no coding | Exercise | until the final assignment, which is | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | An ok introduction to Swift Programming, but I can see people who do not have previous development experience struggling with this course. Also lecturers were virtually nonexistent on the forums to help with questions which is disappointing since it is a paid course which implies you are paying for their time and effort not just the certificate. Best advice for people taking this course is to get through the material as early as possible and give yourself as much time as possible to work on the project, don't wait till the last week to work on it. Would also suggest the following changes to improve the course and help people understand the material better: 1. Have a programming exercise to complete at the end of every week to prove you have understood the material taught, a quiz alone with 10 or less questions is not enough. The course ramps up way to quickly with the project if all you have been doing is following the videos, students should be practicing and proving they know the work far more often. 2. Provide a clearer project brief since it was clear many people did not understand all the requirements. 3. Provide a video of what the final project should do in general to make it even clearer. Overall I didn't have a bad experience with the course, just disappointed that it was really bear bones, there were too few opportunities to prove your understanding, it was poorly managed and the lack of interaction from the lecturers a massive problem when they are being paid to help out, not just provide videos and forget about the students. | material better: 1. Have a programming | Exercise | to complete at the end of | Negative | 0.89 | 3.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Worst course I took on Coursera so far! It was my first course I actually paid for and it turned out to be the least useful one. The small number of exercises and videos does not justify the high price of the course. It might have been ok if they had included the iOS parts also, but charging 70 EUR for the first part alone is grossly overpriced. | useful one. The small number of | Exercise | and videos does not justify the | Positive | 0.74 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Having completed the assignment after many hours of trial & error; here are some suggestions for improving the class for future sessions. Increase the length and depth of the lectures so that more of the materials needed for the assignment are covered. For each week, have an optional programming exercise (not graded) but with a model answer (with explanations of why) so that students have a concrete example on which to practice key concepts on. As classes & structs are very important to completing the assignment (instead of just including the SWIFT manual chapter on classes & structs in the Follow Up Reading), include an actual lecture about this topic. Improve the description of the assignment to be completed. Be specific about what is required (e.g.; what does interface mean? Is is a User interface or is just a specified variable which can be changed in the program code? What do you mean by order of applying filters? Do you mean a variable which lets you decide order of filters and executes the filters accordingly or does the ability to manually rearranging the order of the calling of functions in the code suffice?) Improve the alignment between the assignment and the review criteria. The assignment asks for FIVE filters but there is no matching criterion in the review criteria. Based on the current review criteria, creating two filters would suffice to demonstrate ability to order and get full points for varying intensity for more than 1 filter. I hope the remainder of the modules are better otherwise I will be extremely disappointed ! | each week, have an optional programming | Exercise | (not graded) but with a model | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | It's not a university standard course. It's more like introduction to introduction DIY Swift. The videos are chaotic and lack explications, examples, exercises and practical assignments. Much better intro to Swift can be found on many youtube channels or just on swift documentation website. | are chaotic and lack explications, examples, | Exercise | and practical assignments. Much better intro | Negative | 0.95 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good course, I liked it maybe provide some solution to develop for IOS for those who don't have mac, maybe there is online IDE or something like that and more examples and hands on exercise. | and more examples and hands on | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Should be lecture by Professor instead of BS student. The content was not well organized. Also should prepare slides and explain the Swift for more details. More exercises needed in each weeks lecture. Hopefully, this course should improve next time. | the Swift for more details. More | Exercise | needed in each weeks lecture. Hopefully, | Positive | 0.77 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course should have been more thorough and should have been accompanies with good programming exercises as well..At some starting course there was also some cross talk among the instructors. The module on image processing should be reviewed as after some point it becomes sort of boring. | have been accompanies with good programming | Exercise | as well. . At some starting | Positive | 0.71 | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Nice course but a but a bit hard when you have no programming skills. In fact I do have some programming skill and found it hard to follow. I would also add more exercise to do than Quizzes. | follow. I would also add more | Exercise | to do than Quizzes. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I'm dropping this course because it's just SO poorly conceived. Three weeks in, and I can't really articulate what I've actually learned (which leads me to believe that the answer is "not very much"). The major problem is that this course has no clear objective. And I don't mean that the individual lessons don't have objectives - I actually mean that the entire course doesn't know what it wants to be and the instructors seem to have bypassed this critical question. I have a background in Python, and I was under the impression that this course would teach me how to program in Swift (seems like a fairly straightforward goal). But it isn't that at all. If I were to summarize this course (perhaps a little uncharitably, because I'm annoyed at the time I wasted) it would be: some dudes with a computer talk about some cool features of a programming language. I'm fairly baffled by the fact that there was no thought put into which examples might best illustrate the features they were trying to teach. Which-examples-might-best-illustrate-the-feature-I-am-trying-to-teach is pedagogy 101. They would regularly work through examples just to conclude "actually that's a bad example". This is pretty strong evidence that there was no lesson planning involved. There were also no practice exercises, no posting of pieces of illustrative code, and hence, no way to actually get good at programming in Swift (unless it's self directed, in which case - why bother with the formality of taking a course on Coursera?). | involved. There were also no practice | Exercise | no posting of pieces of illustrative | Negative | 0.68 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Unfortunately the course is not very well thought out. The lecture videos are poorly organized, concepts are not presented in the proper context and lack sufficient detail/depth, little thought or effort was put into designing the examples in the videos, there are no actual coding exercises until the last week, there are no examples of elegant code, nor thoughtful examples of good vs. bad code, the quizzes contain questions that are poorly worded and ambiguous (and I think some actually have the wrong answers and are contradicted by other online resources). It's very high level, and they hand-wave important concepts. I really don't see how this class can actually teach you to build a robust high-quality app. You're probably better off just reading some of the official documentation online. | videos, there are no actual coding | Exercise | until the last week, there are | Negative | 0.67 | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Great as a free course. Would want more material and practical exercises for a paid course. | Would want more material and practical | Exercise | for a paid course. | Negative | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Now this course might seem small but it is not, the test are really challenging and the knowledge of video lectures aren't enough, you have to dig deep and study from other sources too. The simulations in the test and exercises are cool and fun way to learn. I will highly recommend anyone who is interested in cosmology to take this course but be prepared the ocean is not that calm as it seems. Happy learning. | The simulations in the test and | Exercise | are cool and fun way to | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | The course lives up to its title. We indeed confront the "big questions" of modern astronomy: where did the universe come from, what is it made of, what is its future. The presentation is lively and engaging. Relevant topics are touched upon just enough to understand how to approach each question, without any feeling that dense physics is being discussed, as befitting the "highlights" term in the course title. The course structure is very enjoyable and illuminating, and the weekly exercises are superb. Highly recommended. | enjoyable and illuminating, and the weekly | Exercise | are superb. Highly recommended. | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Hard course but satisfying also. Practice exercises are quite long, and sometimes a little hard to read and understand (I say so as a non native english speaker) | Hard course but satisfying also. Practice | Exercise | are quite long, and sometimes a | Positive | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Great course. Excellent exercises, and illuminating lessons. | Great course. Excellent | Exercise | and illuminating lessons. | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| FbK0-CSNEeWDEQ4YpP0FCQ | It is a course that will provide you a start on creating a Mobile App. The subject matter is very well presented and exercises are well thought of. It does give you the glimpse into programming and deployment of the app to your mobile. It does not make you an avid programmer of mobile app. It does brush upon the geo position tutorial. But overall very concise and well thought through topics. | matter is very well presented and | Exercise | are well thought of. It does | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I enjoyed this course and appreciated the fact that not all the assignments were multiple choice. It was great to be able to develop ideas through the case studies and exercises. I would have liked if actual TA's would review our work instead of other classmates, but I realize this might be unrealistic due to the high number of people enrolled in the course. | ideas through the case studies and | Exercise | I would have liked if actual | Negative | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | A very useful course with so many interesting exercises and real examples about Digital Marketing Mix strategies of various businesses. I feel like I learn even more practical knowledge about marketing here than at school! Thank you ASU and Professor Aric! | useful course with so many interesting | Exercise | and real examples about Digital Marketing | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very Good, I found the course exciting and great exercises. | found the course exciting and great | Exercise | | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I found this course really fascinating. The key concepts, academic insights, exercises and assignments; all contributed towards real world and practical learning experience. | fascinating. The key concepts, academic insights, | Exercise | and assignments; all contributed towards real | Positive | 0.88 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Wonderfully designed course. Great insights about co-creation, pwyw and other concepts. Thanks to the instructor for wonderful exercises. They were really relevant. | Thanks to the instructor for wonderful | Exercise | They were really relevant. | Positive | 0.94 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I think the content was quite interesting; as someone new to marketing, I was really looking forward to the lectures and exercises. However, the content was simply too much for me to complete. It's a bit ironic that a course about marketing missed its market. To give a bit more detail: there were 12 video lectures, 3 assignments that had to be done days before the end of the week to be peer-reviewed, and then I had to peer review others work, while also going through all the assigned reading. It seemed more like a courseload for a full time student or perhaps a part-time student. As online students typically are neither, I'm surprised the course content wasn't better managed. I take a lot of notes, so perhaps that's what slowed me down, but I also have a full time job and I intern on the weekends. I was hoping this course could easily be done in the evening hours. Other coursera courses provided an excellent balance of content and courseload, I'm disappointed that this course wasn't one of them. It seemed very useful and interesting. | looking forward to the lectures and | Exercise | However, the content was simply too | Negative | 0.85 | 2.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent class -- interactive with interesting videos and exercises. | -- interactive with interesting videos and | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good course, clear and easy to understand some exercises were outdated as red laser doesn't exist any more | clear and easy to understand some | Exercise | were outdated as red laser doesn't | Positive | 0.71 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Interesting content, practical exercises and well structured. | Interesting content, practical | Exercise | and well structured. | Positive | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I found the information dated and the exercises applied to digital marketing as a consumer first and foremeost secondarily as a B2C marketer. A B2B exercise would have been valuable as well because the markets act so different. Some of the exercises were not remotely useful. I did enjoy the Radiohead, Threadless, and Thingiverse exercises and learn from them. | found the information dated and the | Exercise | applied to digital marketing as a | Positive | 0.94 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I found the information dated and the exercises applied to digital marketing as a consumer first and foremeost secondarily as a B2C marketer. A B2B exercise would have been valuable as well because the markets act so different. Some of the exercises were not remotely useful. I did enjoy the Radiohead, Threadless, and Thingiverse exercises and learn from them. | as a B2C marketer. A B2B | Exercise | would have been valuable as well | Negative | 0.66 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I found the information dated and the exercises applied to digital marketing as a consumer first and foremeost secondarily as a B2C marketer. A B2B exercise would have been valuable as well because the markets act so different. Some of the exercises were not remotely useful. I did enjoy the Radiohead, Threadless, and Thingiverse exercises and learn from them. | act so different. Some of the | Exercise | were not remotely useful. I did | Negative | 0.62 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I found the information dated and the exercises applied to digital marketing as a consumer first and foremeost secondarily as a B2C marketer. A B2B exercise would have been valuable as well because the markets act so different. Some of the exercises were not remotely useful. I did enjoy the Radiohead, Threadless, and Thingiverse exercises and learn from them. | enjoy the Radiohead, Threadless, and Thingiverse | Exercise | and learn from them. | Positive | 0.83 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great materials, interesting exercises | Great materials, interesting | Exercise | | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I really enjoyed this course and I liked the variety of videos as well as "special lessons" with professionals from different fields. The exercises supported studies and gave better understanding of the tools. However, I believe some of the lessons (or videos) were a bit off from topic or gave too much focus on the issues that, I believe, are not that much related to the course purpose. (e.g. too much of 3D printing). Overall, it is a great course and I was pleased to participate in it! | with professionals from different fields. The | Exercise | supported studies and gave better understanding | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course overall, good lectures and good exercises | course overall, good lectures and good | Exercise | | Positive | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This course is very well presented, has the right mix of video lectures, exercises and reading material to keep engagement level high. I learnt not just the theory but saw it working in practice. Excellent work by Prof Aric Rindfleisch and team! | the right mix of video lectures, | Exercise | and reading material to keep engagement | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course provides a good foundation in understanding the impact of digital technologies on business and how marketing is undergoing a shift. The course uses the popular marketing mix framework of 4Ps - Product, Promotion, Placement and Price and shows the effect of digital on each using theory, examples, case studies and exercises. | using theory, examples, case studies and | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Ideal mix of teaching lessons and exercises | Ideal mix of teaching lessons and | Exercise | | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I liked that there were many practical exercises and it was talked about many crazy new technologies. Still, I feel that there was a lot of subtle publicity throughout the course and sometimes the focus was more on the promoting a brand than the lesson and knowledge itself (ex. 3dhubs, the professors lab, Daqri, ....). I understand that to understand better, we need examples, but I wonder if it could maybe be done in a different way. Nevertheless, I learned a lot.Thanks a lot for all the lessons! | liked that there were many practical | Exercise | and it was talked about many | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course in general, with minor issues on exercises Starbucks and Redlaser which is hard to complete if you are not in US. Thanks a lot! | in general, with minor issues on | Exercise | Starbucks and Redlaser which is hard | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Overall a very good course. Great academic perspectiv. Just need to update some exercises to compensate for web changes. | perspectiv. Just need to update some | Exercise | to compensate for web changes. | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | A really great course very interesting. I discovered a lot of thing about Digital Marketing. Exercises are quite funny so it is a pleasure to progress in the course. | lot of thing about Digital Marketing. | Exercise | are quite funny so it is | Negative | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course! I've been very satisfied with the topics treated and about the teaching model. The exercises and the practical assignments have often been time consuming and this is why I found them effective and useful. Thank you | and about the teaching model. The | Exercise | and the practical assignments have often | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | The course provides a good introduction to epidemiology. Both teachers are relaxed and speak very well, which is important for foreign students. I would add more intermediate ,practice exercises before quizzes, intermingling them with lectures. Absorbing too much material before the quiz is not always easy. Especially formulas should be practiced repeatedly with some real life problems, although not too difficult ones, in line with the purpose of the course. | would add more intermediate , practice | Exercise | before quizzes, intermingling them with lectures. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Fo72zMekEeWrYA6c7hw6vQ | This course SEEMS to be a great course. But personally I think it's not. It talks about so many things but none of them are explained clearly. I can't get the picture of this field clearly. The assignment looks nice. But it's not. First, it's not well-organized. Sometimes you need to look at next week's course to do this week's quiz. The programming assignment is VERY VERY unsatisfying. It's not explained clearly; there's no helpful instruction; and it is very confusing. You need to spend hours and hours just UNDERSTANDING what you need to do. And some algorithms are not even told in the course and you need to implement them! I know this could be a good exercise but I would hope it at least provide some useful resources. Generally, I am very disappointed. I feel like I'm spending hours and hours but learning nothing. Just confusion. Please consider reformat the homework; make it more doable for new learners in this field. | know this could be a good | Exercise | but I would hope it at | Negative | 0.94 | 2.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | I like Mr Balch but to be honest I learned next to nothing. Maybe this is a good course for somebody who has no background in finance. As for myself I felt that I was wasting time and money. The book associated with this course was just like the course itself: shallow and doesn't go in any depth to explain the matter fully and rigorously. If you want to know WHAT computational investing is, you can take this class. Googling a bit will have roughly the same effect, though. If you want to learn how to actually DO computational investing, do not take this course - its just not serious enough. As the name of this course implies, you probably expected to find part II somewhere, which was promised to be a course about using machine learning in investing. 3 or 4 years after part I went live, part II is still missing and probably will never come out. The software used in this course, QSTK, is buggy and has been so for 3+ years. Its not maintained by anyone, and the people taking this course had to find ways to overcome QSTK bugs to be able to complete their assignments. And lastly: the exercises. There are none. All you get is a lame quiz for every week which basically asks to change some variables in the scripts provided. I did some coding for week 3 but that was it. No coding practice after that. | complete their assignments. And lastly: the | Exercise | There are none. All you get | Negative | 0.87 | 2.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Some of the data that gets pulled in from the QSTK package is missing for the exercises. It takes a bit of work around to get to the final data set. | QSTK package is missing for the | Exercise | It takes a bit of work | Positive | 0.96 | 3.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | This is really a good set of tools for law students. I have finished the first week, and it really helped a lot already. The videos are not very long, so you can just spend 30 minutes everyday for one or two small videos. The professor uses formal legal language that may require extra work but if you like the legal reasoning, it's such a wonderful exercise! | legal reasoning, it's such a wonderful | Exercise | | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Covers the basics pretty well. This should leave you with a good understanding of what responsive design is. The Bootstrap exercises help greatly in providing that. | what responsive design is. The Bootstrap | Exercise | help greatly in providing that. | Positive | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Anyone expecting to learn every subtlety of Bootstrap will be disappointed--but they deserve to be, this is a fours week course! The course introduces the concept of responsive design both through manually coding your own webpages and using frameworks, taking Bootstrap as an example. Over three short videos the instructor gives just enough for students to start using Bootstrap while also giving them the tools to continue their later independent development. Colleen van Lent is an exceptional instructor who manages to be engaging and motivating while always remaining 'human'. I am not altogether happy with the decision to make all peer reviewed assignments optional, even though I understand the reasoning. For this reason alone I have dropped my review to four stars. If you are prepared to make the effort to take full part in the optional exercises this is a five star course--it's up to you! | take full part in the optional | Exercise | this is a five star course--it's | Positive | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | I am a lover of the science of genetics and have some basic knowledge of the same. I joined this course with a hope to get my concepts clearer. The course is meeting with the expectations to the fullest - after just one week of exercise. | - after just one week of | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | The teacher in the first few weeks is hard to follow; it sounds like he reads from a paper and he barely writes anything on the slides. It sounds like every sentence he says is crucial to understand, which is hard to follow. The other teacher does a much better job at this. The course would also greatly benefit with exercise material so you get a better feeling of calculating these things. | course would also greatly benefit with | Exercise | material so you get a better | Negative | 0.72 | 2.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | I find far too theoretical, too dry; no examples, no exercise guidelines. It's almost having someone reading the slides to you. Still useful for someone like me that never done financial engineering, to find all the concepts in one place. Hence the two stars as oppose to one. | theoretical, too dry; no examples, no | Exercise | guidelines. It's almost having someone reading | Negative | 0.83 | 2.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Challenging course but I've really got a good sense of the mechanics of main financial instruments such as bonds, options, futures, swaptions, etc. Being able to do all the exercises in Excel is pretty convenient. Exercises are difficult because there is no feedback - it's either right or wrong. | Being able to do all the | Exercise | in Excel is pretty convenient. Exercises | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Challenging course but I've really got a good sense of the mechanics of main financial instruments such as bonds, options, futures, swaptions, etc. Being able to do all the exercises in Excel is pretty convenient. Exercises are difficult because there is no feedback - it's either right or wrong. | exercises in Excel is pretty convenient. | Exercise | are difficult because there is no | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | have not finished it yet , but a very good course so far, a lot theory mixed with exercises. | far, a lot theory mixed with | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gh3sMTAAEeW-zwq84wShFQ | I don't want to do the exercise. | I don't want to do the | Exercise | | Negative | 0.77 | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good introduction to Arduino and C. Easy to follow, short videos and good practical exercises. | follow, short videos and good practical | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Too simple and lack of practice exercises! | Too simple and lack of practice | Exercise | | Negative | 0.9 | 2.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | Meat we need more meat. Where is the beef? Recommendation: One question what should a medium to small business do after a IoT hack? Walk this through as an exercise. This question can be part of a whole program exercise. | hack? Walk this through as an | Exercise | This question can be part of | Negative | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | Meat we need more meat. Where is the beef? Recommendation: One question what should a medium to small business do after a IoT hack? Walk this through as an exercise. This question can be part of a whole program exercise. | be part of a whole program | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| GNtVE1J0EeaAmBJfqzpttQ | I enjoyed this course and recommend it highly. I just wish the instructions for the exercises were clearer...but I have to admit I had many distractions and other things going, so I could have done better. | just wish the instructions for the | Exercise | were clearer. . . but I | Negative | 0.65 | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | phenomenal ipython notebook exercises! really well thought out and coherent with the tableau course. goes much deeper than other online SQL courses, problem sets can be hard | phenomenal ipython notebook | Exercise | really well thought out and coherent | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | One of the most amazing MOOC courses I have ever taken. From the start, Jana did an excellent job with building the intuition of databases in general and of SQL. The modules (weeks) are organized coherently. The datasets were realistic and challenging (in a great way). The best aspect of this course is the MySQL exercises, built upon IPython notebook. Personally I have experience with R and Python, yet I still feel like I learned a lot from the exercises. The instructions and lessons as part of the programming exercise were clear and useful, effectively complementing the video lectures and providing hands-on experiences. The only pity I have is that Coursera stopped providing full access to course materials and Statement of Accomplishment. But that has nothing to do with this course. The instructors seem to provided maximal opportunity for all students, including ones (like me ) who are just 'auditing'. Overall, a five star rating is a must for this course. | of this course is the MySQL | Exercise | built upon IPython notebook. Personally I | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | One of the most amazing MOOC courses I have ever taken. From the start, Jana did an excellent job with building the intuition of databases in general and of SQL. The modules (weeks) are organized coherently. The datasets were realistic and challenging (in a great way). The best aspect of this course is the MySQL exercises, built upon IPython notebook. Personally I have experience with R and Python, yet I still feel like I learned a lot from the exercises. The instructions and lessons as part of the programming exercise were clear and useful, effectively complementing the video lectures and providing hands-on experiences. The only pity I have is that Coursera stopped providing full access to course materials and Statement of Accomplishment. But that has nothing to do with this course. The instructors seem to provided maximal opportunity for all students, including ones (like me ) who are just 'auditing'. Overall, a five star rating is a must for this course. | I learned a lot from the | Exercise | The instructions and lessons as part | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | One of the most amazing MOOC courses I have ever taken. From the start, Jana did an excellent job with building the intuition of databases in general and of SQL. The modules (weeks) are organized coherently. The datasets were realistic and challenging (in a great way). The best aspect of this course is the MySQL exercises, built upon IPython notebook. Personally I have experience with R and Python, yet I still feel like I learned a lot from the exercises. The instructions and lessons as part of the programming exercise were clear and useful, effectively complementing the video lectures and providing hands-on experiences. The only pity I have is that Coursera stopped providing full access to course materials and Statement of Accomplishment. But that has nothing to do with this course. The instructors seem to provided maximal opportunity for all students, including ones (like me ) who are just 'auditing'. Overall, a five star rating is a must for this course. | lessons as part of the programming | Exercise | were clear and useful, effectively complementing | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really useful and practical course. The exercises and quizes are the best in all the courses I've taken. | Really useful and practical course. The | Exercise | and quizes are the best in | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The exercises are very well designed. | The | Exercise | are very well designed. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It is a well-organized course. I really learnt a lot from the course. And the assignment and exercise work as a good practice for me to put what I learnt in the course into use. | the course. And the assignment and | Exercise | work as a good practice for | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's pretty good for entry-level SQL learners. However, to further improve, much time is required. Also, exercises provided are sometimes really weird. | improve, much time is required. Also, | Exercise | provided are sometimes really weird. | Positive | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great class to start learning SQL. Jupyter and Teradata are brilliant choices (web-based interface) that avoid the plain of installation. Real datasets from Dognition and Dillard make exercises much more meaningful. Thank you for the careful design and teaching! | datasets from Dognition and Dillard make | Exercise | much more meaningful. Thank you for | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I found the first 4 weeks of the course amazing: just really well structured, thought-out, and delivered in a way that positions the student for success. Jana breaks the material down into digestible bits, gives you sufficient practice, and even if you don't get it, you can look at the answers to the practice questions and figure out where your thinking was incorrect. The 5th week wasn't as well broken down, especially the last set of Teradata exercises. New concepts or ways of structuring queries were being introduced in those exercises, but there was no way to check for a correct solution if I couldn't come with one on my own (which was unfortunately half of the time). I still got a good grade on my last quiz, but I can't say that I really truly learned how to write the more complicated queries. I would suggest that the last Teradata exercise set has more explanation or perhaps just answers that the student can refer to in order to understand why his/her line of thinking isn't working. Otherwise, a truly fantastic course. I 100% recommend it. | especially the last set of Teradata | Exercise | New concepts or ways of structuring | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I found the first 4 weeks of the course amazing: just really well structured, thought-out, and delivered in a way that positions the student for success. Jana breaks the material down into digestible bits, gives you sufficient practice, and even if you don't get it, you can look at the answers to the practice questions and figure out where your thinking was incorrect. The 5th week wasn't as well broken down, especially the last set of Teradata exercises. New concepts or ways of structuring queries were being introduced in those exercises, but there was no way to check for a correct solution if I couldn't come with one on my own (which was unfortunately half of the time). I still got a good grade on my last quiz, but I can't say that I really truly learned how to write the more complicated queries. I would suggest that the last Teradata exercise set has more explanation or perhaps just answers that the student can refer to in order to understand why his/her line of thinking isn't working. Otherwise, a truly fantastic course. I 100% recommend it. | queries were being introduced in those | Exercise | but there was no way to | Negative | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I found the first 4 weeks of the course amazing: just really well structured, thought-out, and delivered in a way that positions the student for success. Jana breaks the material down into digestible bits, gives you sufficient practice, and even if you don't get it, you can look at the answers to the practice questions and figure out where your thinking was incorrect. The 5th week wasn't as well broken down, especially the last set of Teradata exercises. New concepts or ways of structuring queries were being introduced in those exercises, but there was no way to check for a correct solution if I couldn't come with one on my own (which was unfortunately half of the time). I still got a good grade on my last quiz, but I can't say that I really truly learned how to write the more complicated queries. I would suggest that the last Teradata exercise set has more explanation or perhaps just answers that the student can refer to in order to understand why his/her line of thinking isn't working. Otherwise, a truly fantastic course. I 100% recommend it. | would suggest that the last Teradata | Exercise | set has more explanation or perhaps | Negative | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The exercises , quizzes and videos are well planned and help understand the course material. | The | Exercise | , quizzes and videos are well | Positive | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Amazing Course. Learned a lot. A bit tough with exercises but was very helpful. Thank you for everything. | a lot. A bit tough with | Exercise | but was very helpful. Thank you | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Exercises are super challenging. But challenging oneself with difficult tasks is the best way to learn. Its a course worth going for. | | Exercise | are super challenging. But challenging oneself | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent introduction to SQL. Good, short overview of theoretical background. Lots of practice exercises. | of theoretical background. Lots of practice | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The lectures are great, and the exercises are challenging to stimulate stronger learning. | The lectures are great, and the | Exercise | are challenging to stimulate stronger learning. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Professor is great; exercises very effective and useful. Great class! | Professor is great; | Exercise | very effective and useful. Great class! | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | One of the best MOOC courses out there! Challenging but you will learn a lot if you stick with it. Extensive and in-depth lectures/practice exercises on SQL. Appreciate that you learn using two systems, MySQL (through Jupyter) and Teradata. However the Teradata interface is a bit clunky and takes time getting used to. BTW, Jana is a great instructor and Duke courses, in this track, especially the Tableau and MySQL courses are the best out there at the moment. | with it. Extensive and in-depth lectures/practice | Exercise | on SQL. Appreciate that you learn | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | great course.. only thing is answers to teradata exercises were not provided. So student cannot know whether he is writing correct sql statements | only thing is answers to teradata | Exercise | were not provided. So student cannot | Negative | 0.94 | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The video instruction are not as helpful as I wished. They were too brief, and all the learning end up with doing the exercises. The regular exercises and the quizzes use different database system, and it sometimes hard to transfer what you learn to the quizzes. The pre-quiz exercises are more helpful imo, but no answer key is provided. Sometimes I am still confused even after passing the quiz. | learning end up with doing the | Exercise | The regular exercises and the quizzes | Negative | 0.76 | 3.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The video instruction are not as helpful as I wished. They were too brief, and all the learning end up with doing the exercises. The regular exercises and the quizzes use different database system, and it sometimes hard to transfer what you learn to the quizzes. The pre-quiz exercises are more helpful imo, but no answer key is provided. Sometimes I am still confused even after passing the quiz. | with doing the exercises. The regular | Exercise | and the quizzes use different database | Positive | 0.72 | 3.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The video instruction are not as helpful as I wished. They were too brief, and all the learning end up with doing the exercises. The regular exercises and the quizzes use different database system, and it sometimes hard to transfer what you learn to the quizzes. The pre-quiz exercises are more helpful imo, but no answer key is provided. Sometimes I am still confused even after passing the quiz. | learn to the quizzes. The pre-quiz | Exercise | are more helpful imo, but no | Negative | 0.73 | 3.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I love the practice exercises! | I love the practice | Exercise | | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I have a theoretical background in relational algebra and SQL. This course did a great job of actually applying that theory in practice in the form of business situations. By using real life data, it also accurately presented raw data as not perfectly organized or "clean". Filtering with subqueries, IN, WHERE, and OUTER JOIN statements are absolutely crucial in cleaning data in real life situations; this course did an excellent job of demonstrating that importance. I have 2 interrelated critiques however: The usage of 2 different platforms (MySQL for the exercises and Teradata for the quizzes) was very confusing given their distinct syntaxes. I think it would have been more powerful to have the exercises and quizzes on the same platform. Furthermore, the Teradata platform was oftentimes overwhelmed by the number of users and frequently crashed. Going forward I would recommend either ensuring that the servers can handle the amount of user-load, or switching over to the MySQL platform entirely. | 2 different platforms (MySQL for the | Exercise | and Teradata for the quizzes) was | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I have a theoretical background in relational algebra and SQL. This course did a great job of actually applying that theory in practice in the form of business situations. By using real life data, it also accurately presented raw data as not perfectly organized or "clean". Filtering with subqueries, IN, WHERE, and OUTER JOIN statements are absolutely crucial in cleaning data in real life situations; this course did an excellent job of demonstrating that importance. I have 2 interrelated critiques however: The usage of 2 different platforms (MySQL for the exercises and Teradata for the quizzes) was very confusing given their distinct syntaxes. I think it would have been more powerful to have the exercises and quizzes on the same platform. Furthermore, the Teradata platform was oftentimes overwhelmed by the number of users and frequently crashed. Going forward I would recommend either ensuring that the servers can handle the amount of user-load, or switching over to the MySQL platform entirely. | been more powerful to have the | Exercise | and quizzes on the same platform. | Positive | 0.93 | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really like this course!! With abundant exercises, detailed explanation, real-world data and sweeeeet professor, it is a good start for SQL beginner! | like this course! ! With abundant | Exercise | detailed explanation, real-world data and sweeeeet | Negative | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is really awesome! There are a lot of well designed exercises, which not only trained my skill to write SQL query but also deepen my understanding of relational database. The real business data provides learners an opportunity to get in touch with the real business world. So I am excited to recommend you to take this course. If you are a new beginner at MySQL, it can help you get started soon. If you already know some basic knowledge about SQL, this course will also be a good resource for practice. | are a lot of well designed | Exercise | which not only trained my skill | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course for learning SQL - the tutorials, materials and exercises provided are very well thought and structured. The staff put lot of effort and thinking into this one. I like the whole specialization and I can recommend taking it. | SQL - the tutorials, materials and | Exercise | provided are very well thought and | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I'm still in Week 1, but I'm already in love with this course. They give accurate information in a light manner, the exercises are very clear and didactic, and they also give the answers to these exercises which answers all of your potentially uprising questions, alongside with the Video Lectures. It is already giving me the confidence that it will be a great asset to me as a Data Analyst. | information in a light manner, the | Exercise | are very clear and didactic, and | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I'm still in Week 1, but I'm already in love with this course. They give accurate information in a light manner, the exercises are very clear and didactic, and they also give the answers to these exercises which answers all of your potentially uprising questions, alongside with the Video Lectures. It is already giving me the confidence that it will be a great asset to me as a Data Analyst. | also give the answers to these | Exercise | which answers all of your potentially | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This have been a great course, with lot of interesting topics and easy-to-follow structure. Its main strength in my opinion is all the examples and exercises selected for this course to make understanding easier. I'm sure the authors put a lot of effort in this. Thanks a lot, it was worth it! | opinion is all the examples and | Exercise | selected for this course to make | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course developed by Andrew Ng is quite interesting, going to the essentials in order student get the big picture and the essential tools for building the backbone of future ML applications. Of course, being confident with mathematics principles and notations will be helpful but most of the time, it's not an issue if you have the minimal knowledge. What it lacks on Coursera is the next stage of this course where we could investigate further the technologies presented but in more technical way. Maybe we might see that in the future... Regarding course supports (videos, forums ...), they are of good quality and the fact Andrew used them by drawing on slides helps to have a better understanding. We could notice that there are few minor errors (eg: a "j" index which becomes "i" in J(theta) writing) and I think the technical slides on Back propagation could be improved if a dedicated slide to used mathematical notations / definitions. Sometimes, there are some errors which could induce some confusions. But these minors errors don't hide the impressive work done by Andrew. Regarding assessments, quizzes could be tricky if you don't got the "spirit" (not an exam habit in France) and coding exercises are well structured in order the student will focus on the core modules of the lesson and not on information flow. These exercises are inspiring if you're interesting in teaching and inspiring for Data Scientist Apprentices if you investigate the utils functions developed to support the exercise. Many thanks for this great course and I hope my two cents will help other people to attend it Bruno | exam habit in France) and coding | Exercise | are well structured in order the | Positive | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course developed by Andrew Ng is quite interesting, going to the essentials in order student get the big picture and the essential tools for building the backbone of future ML applications. Of course, being confident with mathematics principles and notations will be helpful but most of the time, it's not an issue if you have the minimal knowledge. What it lacks on Coursera is the next stage of this course where we could investigate further the technologies presented but in more technical way. Maybe we might see that in the future... Regarding course supports (videos, forums ...), they are of good quality and the fact Andrew used them by drawing on slides helps to have a better understanding. We could notice that there are few minor errors (eg: a "j" index which becomes "i" in J(theta) writing) and I think the technical slides on Back propagation could be improved if a dedicated slide to used mathematical notations / definitions. Sometimes, there are some errors which could induce some confusions. But these minors errors don't hide the impressive work done by Andrew. Regarding assessments, quizzes could be tricky if you don't got the "spirit" (not an exam habit in France) and coding exercises are well structured in order the student will focus on the core modules of the lesson and not on information flow. These exercises are inspiring if you're interesting in teaching and inspiring for Data Scientist Apprentices if you investigate the utils functions developed to support the exercise. Many thanks for this great course and I hope my two cents will help other people to attend it Bruno | and not on information flow. These | Exercise | are inspiring if you're interesting in | Negative | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course developed by Andrew Ng is quite interesting, going to the essentials in order student get the big picture and the essential tools for building the backbone of future ML applications. Of course, being confident with mathematics principles and notations will be helpful but most of the time, it's not an issue if you have the minimal knowledge. What it lacks on Coursera is the next stage of this course where we could investigate further the technologies presented but in more technical way. Maybe we might see that in the future... Regarding course supports (videos, forums ...), they are of good quality and the fact Andrew used them by drawing on slides helps to have a better understanding. We could notice that there are few minor errors (eg: a "j" index which becomes "i" in J(theta) writing) and I think the technical slides on Back propagation could be improved if a dedicated slide to used mathematical notations / definitions. Sometimes, there are some errors which could induce some confusions. But these minors errors don't hide the impressive work done by Andrew. Regarding assessments, quizzes could be tricky if you don't got the "spirit" (not an exam habit in France) and coding exercises are well structured in order the student will focus on the core modules of the lesson and not on information flow. These exercises are inspiring if you're interesting in teaching and inspiring for Data Scientist Apprentices if you investigate the utils functions developed to support the exercise. Many thanks for this great course and I hope my two cents will help other people to attend it Bruno | utils functions developed to support the | Exercise | Many thanks for this great course | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | About me: I studied computer science in Dortmund, Germany in the 90ies. I recommend this course to everyone who wants to have a very good understanding of machine learning. A little bit of advice, if you have never learned linear algebra on a university level, you should at least try to get a basic understanding of it before starting this course. I was happy that I remembered stuff, learning it from scratch in 1 or 2 weeks would be difficult, I assume. +: * Mathematical basics of machine learning are very well explained * Andrew Ng is a very good professor, he explains the topic very well and thoroughly * It is not limited by using a special framework or language * The support in the forums, and the transcription of the talks, and all the material that is given to you is really excellent. -: * I would be happy if the programming exercises would be a bit more fun, currently it feels like translating / transforming math formulas into octave, which is fine, but not very fun. Having said that I am only in week 4, perhaps this will happen later * some text questions in the multiple choice quizzes require a precise understanding of the english language, especially in regards to math, I am not a native speaker, so these questions feel especially hard for me | would be happy if the programming | Exercise | would be a bit more fun, | Positive | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew NG is great! Not only the classes but also the exercises are really valuable. Don't miss it! | only the classes but also the | Exercise | are really valuable. Don't miss it! | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Programming exercises are really hard and you don't find much help | Programming | Exercise | are really hard and you don't | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. Not only teaches concepts, it also gives you exercises to check your understanding. I wish i can get some real problems where i can apply all of these learnings. | teaches concepts, it also gives you | Exercise | to check your understanding. I wish | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is very friendly to new learners of machine learning. The teacher is a famous scholar in this field, and his explanation is full and accurate. Besides, he will also give warnings about details occasionally, so that when you are actually working on a project, you will not wasting time doing useless thing. And the programming exercise is brilliant, not very hard, but requiring some time for new learners. I think I have benefit a lot from this course. | doing useless thing. And the programming | Exercise | is brilliant, not very hard, but | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was definitely a journey. Very detailed, interesting, practical and useful. I'm so glad I stumbled upon a review of this course online which then lead to me taking this course. I have to admit that this course is not an easy one and has lots of advanced math. Also the programming exercises are very hard, sometimes you stuck trying to translate math formulas in Octave... Nevertheless, this is definitely a great course and I'm very thankful to Andrew Ng for making it. | of advanced math. Also the programming | Exercise | are very hard, sometimes you stuck | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course for learning basics of machine learning. Very well explained by Professor Andrew Ng and exercise complement the lectures very well. | explained by Professor Andrew Ng and | Exercise | complement the lectures very well. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Interesting and practical introduction, easily delivered complicated mathematical algorithms and programming exercises which are based on practical problems. It was fun to learn! | delivered complicated mathematical algorithms and programming | Exercise | which are based on practical problems. | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting introduction to Machine Learning. All lecture notes are beautifully presented by Andrew Ng. I have truly enjoyed his style. Quizzes and programming exercises are good | enjoyed his style. Quizzes and programming | Exercise | are good | Positive | 0.93 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! Very well structured, the videos explain in a very intuitive manner the logic behind the algorithms and the mathematical computations. The exercises are practical examples with lots of helpful explanations. | algorithms and the mathematical computations. The | Exercise | are practical examples with lots of | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you Prof. Ng and Mentors that your effort to educate - well designed course, teaching, quizzes and exercises to help us understand essence of ML. I am not a computer scientist graduate student / graduate but I am interested in data. This course will start my new direction of research and work. Good luck to all of you who encounter this course! | well designed course, teaching, quizzes and | Exercise | to help us understand essence of | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting subject matter, and I learned a lot. My biggest complaint is that many of the programming exercises have errors in them that haven't been fixed, despite this course having been running for years. This always left me wondering if an incorrect output was an error on my part, or an error in the provided code. Still, I thoroughly enjoyed the course as a whole and would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a foundation in machine learning. | is that many of the programming | Exercise | have errors in them that haven't | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The couse has well organized lectures and exercises. So, you can easily understand topics and be able to evaluate results and investigate if something goes wrong. | couse has well organized lectures and | Exercise | So, you can easily understand topics | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Concepts are thoroughly explained and training exercises are thoughtfully selected. I started with 0 knowledge in the field, yet after completion I feel confident to apply the gained skills to practical tasks at hand. Thank you Professor Ng! | Concepts are thoroughly explained and training | Exercise | are thoughtfully selected. I started with | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew's explanation are easy to understand and most exercise are fun and feel like actual real-world problems! Thank you for making this course available! | are easy to understand and most | Exercise | are fun and feel like actual | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Simplified various aspects of Machine learning in a way it is easy to understand. Mentors and discussion forums were really helpful in accomplishing the programming exercises immensely. Thanks for making this successful. Hope to continue to apply this learning to solve a problem or two. :) | really helpful in accomplishing the programming | Exercise | immensely. Thanks for making this successful. | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, the programming exercises weren't that challenging but I guess it is meant to be an introductory class. It is a great first step in machine learning for people with little programming experience as well. | Very good course, the programming | Exercise | weren't that challenging but I guess | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! The lectures were really well constructed and really well delivered. The exercises were useful too! | constructed and really well delivered. The | Exercise | were useful too! | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great introduction to Machine Learning techniques. Because learners do not build assignments from the ground up, do not expect to be adept at implementing any of the tools taught here. Figuring out what had already been done required about 40% of my time solving the exercises. Some errors in the provided code are not corrected, so check the errata! | 40% of my time solving the | Exercise | Some errors in the provided code | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I just feel a strong urge to express my feelings after having completed this splendid course. I really feel completely transformed after completing it right now. It can literally feel the changes inside my brain's neural circuits taking place. I didn't took this course just by accident. I am a currently an undergraduate student of Computer Engineering and I was already interested in Machine Learning from my first year at University. I even got a book by Tom Mitchell with some difficulty but I couldn't read it much. Then I ended up on this course on Coursera and I have to say that in the modern world, education is better off being in the form of MOOCs than the traditional concept of learning by books. I can't describe verbally how beneficial this course have been for me. Even though, there is a thing that I'd like share: I couldn't complete this course in just one session. In fact, I could complete it in 4 complete sessions, thanks to the Switching Sessions feature present on Coursera. I had a lot hurdles along with this course and I also couldn't be regular on the internet. Once in the middle of the second session, I deferred it to complete another MOOC here on Coursera called "Learning How to Learn" and it was, again, an impressive course. One of the most frustrating yet very knowledgeable portion of this course was the programming exercises on Octave. I had to install a Kubuntu besides my Windows OS and ran it on dual-boot. There were so many other hurdles but I finally went through them, though taking a lot of time. This whole journey has been very insightful and interesting and truly, it has left an indelible impression on me. I have immense respect for Professor Andrew Ng for helping out multitude of students, including me. There was nothing in the course that I didn't love. I enjoyed every bit of it through every byte. The hurdles like those programming exercises had also been a source of huge joy when I was able to complete them after hours of fiddling around with the Octave codes. In the end, I want to say that I feel highly privileged having been able to find and complete this course. And, not to mention, it's nature of being totally free of cost allows students belonging to any class of society from any part of the world to readily benefit from it. I thank the Professor and the whole team involved from the depth of my heart. | of this course was the programming | Exercise | on Octave. I had to install | Negative | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I just feel a strong urge to express my feelings after having completed this splendid course. I really feel completely transformed after completing it right now. It can literally feel the changes inside my brain's neural circuits taking place. I didn't took this course just by accident. I am a currently an undergraduate student of Computer Engineering and I was already interested in Machine Learning from my first year at University. I even got a book by Tom Mitchell with some difficulty but I couldn't read it much. Then I ended up on this course on Coursera and I have to say that in the modern world, education is better off being in the form of MOOCs than the traditional concept of learning by books. I can't describe verbally how beneficial this course have been for me. Even though, there is a thing that I'd like share: I couldn't complete this course in just one session. In fact, I could complete it in 4 complete sessions, thanks to the Switching Sessions feature present on Coursera. I had a lot hurdles along with this course and I also couldn't be regular on the internet. Once in the middle of the second session, I deferred it to complete another MOOC here on Coursera called "Learning How to Learn" and it was, again, an impressive course. One of the most frustrating yet very knowledgeable portion of this course was the programming exercises on Octave. I had to install a Kubuntu besides my Windows OS and ran it on dual-boot. There were so many other hurdles but I finally went through them, though taking a lot of time. This whole journey has been very insightful and interesting and truly, it has left an indelible impression on me. I have immense respect for Professor Andrew Ng for helping out multitude of students, including me. There was nothing in the course that I didn't love. I enjoyed every bit of it through every byte. The hurdles like those programming exercises had also been a source of huge joy when I was able to complete them after hours of fiddling around with the Octave codes. In the end, I want to say that I feel highly privileged having been able to find and complete this course. And, not to mention, it's nature of being totally free of cost allows students belonging to any class of society from any part of the world to readily benefit from it. I thank the Professor and the whole team involved from the depth of my heart. | byte. The hurdles like those programming | Exercise | had also been a source of | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | About me: I'm a professional industrial control systems programmer. About this course: It contains challenging math for someone who has been out of school for 25 years. I'm no where close to the 3 hour time estimate for the exercises (more like +12 hours) but the course content and presentation is exceptional. This is the course that is finally giving me a working nuts a bolts understanding of machine learning, AI, and neural networks. | 3 hour time estimate for the | Exercise | (more like +12 hours) but the | Negative | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is an excellent course . The exercises are useful and provide a solid platform to understand the details of machine learning . | is an excellent course . The | Exercise | are useful and provide a solid | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great class! Wish more classes were like it. I only wish there were more programming exercises. | only wish there were more programming | Exercise | | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | When I started this class I had only the fuzziest notions about what machine learning really is. By the end I had a solid understanding both of the underlying mathematical principles used in machine learning and of the practical considerations for applying it to real world problems. I really enjoyed Professor Ng's lectures and the course mentors are very knowledgeable and helpful. The programming exercises did a lot to reinforce the week's material. The time estimates are pretty good too which made it easier for me to organize my schedule and get all the work done. I'm very happy with the course and looking forward to using machine learning in my projects. | very knowledgeable and helpful. The programming | Exercise | did a lot to reinforce the | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good material, good exercises to work on, adequate course duration. | Good material, good | Exercise | to work on, adequate course duration. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course with several examples and exercises. It might explains its popularity! | Awesome course with several examples and | Exercise | It might explains its popularity! | Positive | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The initial course is too heavy in theory without enough examples or exercises to follow up upon. | in theory without enough examples or | Exercise | to follow up upon. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Outstanding introduction to machine learning. Prof. Ng really knows how to make complex things appear simple. For a beginner, almost all the bases are covered in this course. Now, I'm motivated to take things to the next level by studying an advanced book & implementing a full-fledged learning algorithm on my own. Only thing that could have been done better: Programming exercises in R / Python instead of Octave. | could have been done better: Programming | Exercise | in R / Python instead of | Negative | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng's lectures and exercises are clear and engaging. The course has been a pleasure. | Andrew Ng's lectures and | Exercise | are clear and engaging. The course | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is excellently organised. You will learn very interesting things about Machine Learning, but you will also work your programming skills (MATLAB/Octave). You don't need to know a lot of algebra or programming, although every knowledge is useful. Professor Andrew Ng is excellent and all the exercises are very well explained. Forums are VERY useful too, you will get help and feedback from teachers and other students very quickly. I completely recommend it to anyone in the engineering, computer science or even other scientific disciplines. | Ng is excellent and all the | Exercise | are very well explained. Forums are | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Professor Ng is a great teacher, his course is both challenging and satisfying. The exercises require you to take one step beyond the lecture -- not just parrot back the transcript -- you have to think about the implications of what you've just studied. Yet Ng's presentations are lucid and informative and that next step is obvious, once you think about it. My greatest challenge is that, although I have been programming for decades, I've only dabbled in a functional language like Octave and my last math class dates back to the 70s. However, the math requirements are not onerous and I'm struggling through the Octave assignments with some success. Although the course is 11 weeks there are more than 16 lectures as some weeks have two complete sets of lectures PLUS there are assignments every week that take a few hours to complete. So while there is a little more work in this course than in other Coursera offerings there is great value for the money and time spent. If you're interested in Machine Learning this course is a great place to start. | is both challenging and satisfying. The | Exercise | require you to take one step | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | great course, nice teacher, it's not difficult to follow the class and exercises as long as you take some efforts. | difficult to follow the class and | Exercise | as long as you take some | Negative | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An excellent introduction to various machine learning methods. Dr Ng's clear and succinct exposition makes light work of the theory, but if you pay attention and work through the exercises there is greater depth than first meets the eye. | pay attention and work through the | Exercise | there is greater depth than first | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent! I got a degree in Machine Learning at UCL, and both during and after my studies I found clear explanations from Professor Andrew Ng when I most needed them. The course is designed this way: each thing taught by Andrew is tested, evaluated, so one can monitor his/her advance all the time. I myself am a teacher in my country, and think that this is the way a teacher should design his courses, creating resources to monitor the learning of the students on the go, all the time, with plenty of simple exercises together with few difficult projects and tests. | the time, with plenty of simple | Exercise | together with few difficult projects and | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is an excellent first course in Machine Learning and is definitely worth one's time. The programming exercises took me a little longer to complete than the recommended 3 hours, but the feeling of satisfaction on getting them right is priceless. | definitely worth one's time. The programming | Exercise | took me a little longer to | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is an excellent course. The instructor provides extremely clear explanations, both from the theoretical viewpoint as well as regarding the intuition of the ideas underlying the algorithms. The course provides a complete overview of the field in a concise manner. The exercises help absorb and understand the material. Strongly recommended to anyone wishing to learn (and work hard). | field in a concise manner. The | Exercise | help absorb and understand the material. | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great hands on exercises and very clearly explained material. Was a bit slow for me I had to watch it at 2x: perhaps the simplest maths should be factored out into a separate mini course and assume a certain background for this one. The course is rather broad, though I was surprised not to hear once about Bayes or Markov (n-grams, HMM etc.). It might be a good idea to create a specialisation consisting of a separate basic maths part, all the methods presented here, methods applicable to bioinformatics and NLP too. And to top it all of Computer Vision. I assume the by-pixel techniques used in this course were just illustrating the points, as I would expect Gabor wavelets or something to reduce dimensionality and save ourselves from sliding windows (and rotations as a bonus). I am not sure if in this specialisation I would have liked to have all "science" points (how to run an experiment analyse results) separate from "how to implement an algorithm" and "why the algorithm works" or mixed in as this course does. I think either works. Some navigational infrastructure on coursera would be awesome (wiki style opportunities to jump around between "aspects" etc.). Finally, some summary notes would be very useful. When I do decide to implement any of this I will have to look through the exercise pdfs which are a bit long and at my code - perhaps, at the end, when you know someone has completed the exercises. Otherwise, the exercises are awesome. | Great hands on | Exercise | and very clearly explained material. Was | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great hands on exercises and very clearly explained material. Was a bit slow for me I had to watch it at 2x: perhaps the simplest maths should be factored out into a separate mini course and assume a certain background for this one. The course is rather broad, though I was surprised not to hear once about Bayes or Markov (n-grams, HMM etc.). It might be a good idea to create a specialisation consisting of a separate basic maths part, all the methods presented here, methods applicable to bioinformatics and NLP too. And to top it all of Computer Vision. I assume the by-pixel techniques used in this course were just illustrating the points, as I would expect Gabor wavelets or something to reduce dimensionality and save ourselves from sliding windows (and rotations as a bonus). I am not sure if in this specialisation I would have liked to have all "science" points (how to run an experiment analyse results) separate from "how to implement an algorithm" and "why the algorithm works" or mixed in as this course does. I think either works. Some navigational infrastructure on coursera would be awesome (wiki style opportunities to jump around between "aspects" etc.). Finally, some summary notes would be very useful. When I do decide to implement any of this I will have to look through the exercise pdfs which are a bit long and at my code - perhaps, at the end, when you know someone has completed the exercises. Otherwise, the exercises are awesome. | will have to look through the | Exercise | pdfs which are a bit long | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great hands on exercises and very clearly explained material. Was a bit slow for me I had to watch it at 2x: perhaps the simplest maths should be factored out into a separate mini course and assume a certain background for this one. The course is rather broad, though I was surprised not to hear once about Bayes or Markov (n-grams, HMM etc.). It might be a good idea to create a specialisation consisting of a separate basic maths part, all the methods presented here, methods applicable to bioinformatics and NLP too. And to top it all of Computer Vision. I assume the by-pixel techniques used in this course were just illustrating the points, as I would expect Gabor wavelets or something to reduce dimensionality and save ourselves from sliding windows (and rotations as a bonus). I am not sure if in this specialisation I would have liked to have all "science" points (how to run an experiment analyse results) separate from "how to implement an algorithm" and "why the algorithm works" or mixed in as this course does. I think either works. Some navigational infrastructure on coursera would be awesome (wiki style opportunities to jump around between "aspects" etc.). Finally, some summary notes would be very useful. When I do decide to implement any of this I will have to look through the exercise pdfs which are a bit long and at my code - perhaps, at the end, when you know someone has completed the exercises. Otherwise, the exercises are awesome. | you know someone has completed the | Exercise | Otherwise, the exercises are awesome. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great hands on exercises and very clearly explained material. Was a bit slow for me I had to watch it at 2x: perhaps the simplest maths should be factored out into a separate mini course and assume a certain background for this one. The course is rather broad, though I was surprised not to hear once about Bayes or Markov (n-grams, HMM etc.). It might be a good idea to create a specialisation consisting of a separate basic maths part, all the methods presented here, methods applicable to bioinformatics and NLP too. And to top it all of Computer Vision. I assume the by-pixel techniques used in this course were just illustrating the points, as I would expect Gabor wavelets or something to reduce dimensionality and save ourselves from sliding windows (and rotations as a bonus). I am not sure if in this specialisation I would have liked to have all "science" points (how to run an experiment analyse results) separate from "how to implement an algorithm" and "why the algorithm works" or mixed in as this course does. I think either works. Some navigational infrastructure on coursera would be awesome (wiki style opportunities to jump around between "aspects" etc.). Finally, some summary notes would be very useful. When I do decide to implement any of this I will have to look through the exercise pdfs which are a bit long and at my code - perhaps, at the end, when you know someone has completed the exercises. Otherwise, the exercises are awesome. | has completed the exercises. Otherwise, the | Exercise | are awesome. | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, Andrew Ng does a good job at easing you into this complex subject, particularly for somebody like myself without much maths background. Looking at other video courses on the subject, I think more interactive visualisations could've been a great help, for example to gain some intuition about polynomials with different input parameters. Drawing lines on screen works, but I've had many revelations when working with the interactive tools linked from the wiki content. In some course exercises, the tutor and lecturer disagreed on the approach (e.g. vectorised vs. iterative), so the videos/PDFs were inconsistent with discussions/tutorials - a bit confusing. | the wiki content. In some course | Exercise | the tutor and lecturer disagreed on | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great introduction course to machine learning. Coming to the class I wasn't sure if the math involved would be too complex to follow. But Professor Ng's clear explanation of the concept and intuition behind complex algorithms made them much easier to understand or dare I say enjoyable. The programming exercises are not too difficult either once you get over the first hump of familiarizing yourself with Octave or Matlab (I used Octave for the first time for this course). | dare I say enjoyable. The programming | Exercise | are not too difficult either once | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course offers an insight to most of the machine learning techniques currently deployed. However, it does not go in depth for any of it. Amazing programming exercises, very well structured, very helpful and easily understandable. They make sure that you only implement what is relevant to the course and all else clutter (reading, typechecking, etc) is already in place for you. The instructor is easily understandable and the presentations are very well structured. Coming from an engineering/computing background, would hope for more math and insights, but this is a course that can be taken by economics or other majors. Really enjoyed it and has prepared me to delve deeper into machine learning and craft ML systems as part of my school or in my free time. | for any of it. Amazing programming | Exercise | very well structured, very helpful and | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lectures are perfect for beginners. Although, the use of linear algebra could have been emphasised much more because that is where the magic happens. The support from mentors is exceptionally well. You will get a reply within half an hour. The learning exercises are meticulously curated. The instructor, Andrew Ng sir is brilliant. The best course for a complete beginner on machine learning. | within half an hour. The learning | Exercise | are meticulously curated. The instructor, Andrew | Negative | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The best of all the courses I've taken till date. Taught very well, taking into account all kinds of students, those with and without mathematical background. That's the really great part. The forums were very helpful, the exercises were very relatable to the industry problems and made simple via the detailed instruction documents given along with the exercises. Has great Wiki and materials supporting the course. All in all a very insightful and detailed course for anyone who wants to get into this field. Thanks to Mr. Andrew Ng and the entire Coursera team! | The forums were very helpful, the | Exercise | were very relatable to the industry | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The best of all the courses I've taken till date. Taught very well, taking into account all kinds of students, those with and without mathematical background. That's the really great part. The forums were very helpful, the exercises were very relatable to the industry problems and made simple via the detailed instruction documents given along with the exercises. Has great Wiki and materials supporting the course. All in all a very insightful and detailed course for anyone who wants to get into this field. Thanks to Mr. Andrew Ng and the entire Coursera team! | instruction documents given along with the | Exercise | Has great Wiki and materials supporting | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was a great introduction to machine learning (ML). Besides the ML concepts and methods, the course explained the necessary mathematical and statistical concepts in a clear and simple manner. I believe people who have not done much maths or stats should be able to follow the materials. ML concepts were explained in a clear fashion with relevant examples and a good level of depth. The weekly programming exercises require the student put aside at least 2 hours but they are interesting and not impossibly challenging. | level of depth. The weekly programming | Exercise | require the student put aside at | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Classes are amazing. Exercises could be a little bit tougher. | Classes are amazing. | Exercise | could be a little bit tougher. | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Hand-on exercises and intuitive explanations are those I like most in this course. | Hand-on | Exercise | and intuitive explanations are those I | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent teaching style! Very insightful, intuitive explanations, straight to the point, "no spam videos", mathematically deeper than other courses and well balanced with hands-on-like comments about best implementation practices and strategy decisions tips for different ML problems. You have to submit matlab exercises. | problems. You have to submit matlab | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The teacher makes the difficult materials easy to understand. Furthermore, the exercises help students to have good intuitions to the theories. | materials easy to understand. Furthermore, the | Exercise | help students to have good intuitions | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An ideal survey course, refresher, or introduction to machine learning. An immense amount of thought has gone into the videos and the exercises. Worth every minute, particularly if you are interested in understanding the theory behind the core concepts of machine learning. | gone into the videos and the | Exercise | Worth every minute, particularly if you | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great teacher, great classes, great programming exercises. Everything in this course is awesome. It covers from basic topics to more advanced concepts. Really loving it :) | Great teacher, great classes, great programming | Exercise | Everything in this course is awesome. | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very accessible course, with a wide variety of topics. It provides a good introduction to ML. The pacing of the course is good, and somewhat faster than e.g. WU's machine learning specialization (where linear regression and classification take up an entire module, instead of one lecture). In that sense, this course may be a particularly good fit for people that already have some working knowledge of statistics and (statistical) programming. Also, Andrew Ng is a very good and inspiring professor. In the programming exercises, there is a lot of emphasis on vectorization, which is very useful. However, once you've wrapped your head around that concept, many of them sometimes seem a little too straightforward to implement. Nonetheless, the applications are very cool, including e.g. computer vision and anomaly detection. The (free) software (Octave) is very intuitive and easy to use. All in all, an excellent course. If only there was an "intermediate ML" follow up by professor Ng. | and inspiring professor. In the programming | Exercise | there is a lot of emphasis | Positive | 0.85 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, and the exercises are very helpful. | Excellent course, and the | Exercise | are very helpful. | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent introduction in both theory and exercise. thanks to this course !! | Excellent introduction in both theory and | Exercise | thanks to this course ! ! | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course by Andrew Ng! He develops the intuition and the programming exercises are brilliant. | develops the intuition and the programming | Exercise | are brilliant. | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course is well taught and straightforward. Exercises are painfully easy. | Course is well taught and straightforward. | Exercise | are painfully easy. | Positive | 0.88 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great grounding in the just the right amount of detail of the most popular ML algorithms. Very clear and precise lectures, especially good when combined with the 'speed up' options. Even though you will undoubtable be using different languages for coding real applications than Octave/Matlab, the exercises are still very useful because they are pitched at just the right level of difficultly; they require you to understand the scripts and the system as a whole, but you are not required to become proficient enough to build the whole systems in Octave yourself which would be a waste of your time. | coding real applications than Octave/Matlab, the | Exercise | are still very useful because they | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent! Very focused on concrete applications, but also in providing a certain level of depth on the theory side. Very clear and practical lectures. Very good programming exercises, progressively challenging and good to sediment the knowledge. A good way of getting in touch with main topics in ML. | and practical lectures. Very good programming | Exercise | progressively challenging and good to sediment | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction and exercise in the fundamentals of modern machine learning. Would be better if an optional reading list of key articles/books in the field were provided. | Very good introduction and | Exercise | in the fundamentals of modern machine | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good pacing, very interesting content. The exercises are moderately challenging and help better integrate the content. | Good pacing, very interesting content. The | Exercise | are moderately challenging and help better | Positive | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. The scope and depth of the material has been carefully chosen. The exercises empower the students to take off on their own future projects. | material has been carefully chosen. The | Exercise | empower the students to take off | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great! Very clear explanations and exercises! | Great! Very clear explanations and | Exercise | | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good theoretical explaination but more practical exercises would have been welcome | good theoretical explaination but more practical | Exercise | would have been welcome | Negative | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course really makes you understand how Machine Learning algorithms work. You have to solve challenging programming exercises to complete it. Fortunately the support given by the community is always one click away. Professor Andrew Ng is really an engaging person who transmit his deep love for the matter. I would save the fifth star for when typos will be solved and audio quality will be improved. | You have to solve challenging programming | Exercise | to complete it. Fortunately the support | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent exercise. | Excellent | Exercise | | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, only the programming exercises are a little basic. | Very good, only the programming | Exercise | are a little basic. | Positive | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The best introductory course in ML. Don't be afraid of using Octave/Matlab. The syntax is easy to learn and the programming exercises are one of the important part of the course that enhance your understanding to another level. The course covers really important topics in ML and provides extremely practical advises. You can understand most of the concept without strong background in math like linear algebra and calculus. | easy to learn and the programming | Exercise | are one of the important part | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | Great content that's well explained, with | Exercise | that suit the content well. Content | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course - very clearly taught with good examples and programming exercises. This makes a huge difference - I really engaged with and enjoyed the course. I would highly recommend it. | taught with good examples and programming | Exercise | This makes a huge difference - | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good. However, I need more detail and advanced exercise. | I need more detail and advanced | Exercise | | Positive | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course, great quizes and programming exercises | Awesome course, great quizes and programming | Exercise | | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | the course is excellent! friendly learning material and sufficient exercise with great explanation | excellent! friendly learning material and sufficient | Exercise | with great explanation | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course material for folks curious about machine learning. Right balance of lectures and lab exercises. i would sincerely recommend this course to all curious minds. Prof. Andrew Ng is a great teacher | Right balance of lectures and lab | Exercise | i would sincerely recommend this course | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Strengths: 1. Programming exercises are really valuable, they solve real problems, and they are not too hard and not too easy, just fine! 2. Teaches you the way of developing a machine learning system and evaluating them 3. Does not need so much previous knowledge of math(it is also a weakness) 4. Gives intuitions about the models and algorithms while not using too much theoretical stuff Weaknesses: 1. weakness, this course will not teach you the mathematical/statistical models in detail, for some persons(like me) it is important Anyway, this course was awesome ^_^ | Strengths: 1. Programming | Exercise | are really valuable, they solve real | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | My expectations was well met in this course. Andrew Ng is a natural and comfortable lecturer that is confident in his knowledge. The course material is well presented. The course is involved because of the programming exercises. | is involved because of the programming | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng dives right into the subject matter of this course yet provides real world samples of the applications of machine learning. The exercises provide significant challenge if you're rusty on calculus and completely new to this topic, so I would recommend joining a study group or creating one yourself. I would take this course again to refresh the concepts of machine learning, especially if it is revised to stay up to date in the future. | the applications of machine learning. The | Exercise | provide significant challenge if you're rusty | Negative | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent class, in terms of specific content and didactical approach. All addressed topics are well motivated with real examples, and elaborated in great details, at the right pace. Lecture videos are clear, very accurate, and very accessible at the same time. Lab exercises are challenging and very much helping in fully grasping the concepts. One of the best classes I have ever attended, much better of many courses I attended in my university years. Thank you very much Professor Andrew Ng, Coursera, and Stanford ! | accessible at the same time. Lab | Exercise | are challenging and very much helping | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great and Engaging videos , Just enough time is given to assimilate the course content . Love the exercises. | the course content . Love the | Exercise | | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The learning curve is never plateauing when following this course, great explanations and great business examples. The code exercise are great to get hands on and really check what you've heard in the videos. | and great business examples. The code | Exercise | are great to get hands on | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very enjoyable lectures, very well put together materials, extremely helpful exercises, thank you! | well put together materials, extremely helpful | Exercise | thank you! | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | hope can have more coding exercises in last two seminar. | hope can have more coding | Exercise | in last two seminar. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course but the programming exercises didn't run with the new version of Octave without some changes. | Good course but the programming | Exercise | didn't run with the new version | Negative | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Detail explanations, good exercises | Detail explanations, good | Exercise | | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A wonderful course for anyone who wants to learn the basics of ML. Prof Andrew in this course not only gives clear explanations of theory behind ML algorithms, but prepares exercises that allow students to put the theories into implementation. Highly recommend. | theory behind ML algorithms, but prepares | Exercise | that allow students to put the | Negative | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was very well done. I enjoyed learning and using Octave. The lectures were clear and the exercises were fun. | The lectures were clear and the | Exercise | were fun. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course for beginners. This course has completed satisfied my initial requirements. Quizzes and exercises are very include and ofcourse Mr Andrew is perfect at what he does. | satisfied my initial requirements. Quizzes and | Exercise | are very include and ofcourse Mr | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course with a lot of well guided exercises! Made hard stuff easy to understand. Good way to start learning about Machie Learning. | with a lot of well guided | Exercise | Made hard stuff easy to understand. | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a fantastic course! I have a computational physics/chemistry background but had no prior machine learning experience. This course allowed me to gain a solid foundation in machine learning. The lectures are very well paced and the exercises and revision questions well thought out. Enough real-world context is given to prevent things from being too abstract, but the great bulk of the time is spent actually learning how to apply machine learning. Well worth the money. Thanks Andrew! | are very well paced and the | Exercise | and revision questions well thought out. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course! Well structured, covers a broad range of topics, and Andrew is a great teacher who knows how to break things down to their essential parts and how to visualize them. For people who have none or only little programming experience, the programming exercises might be very time-consuming. I enjoyed them a lot since one has to implement the algorithms oneself and not just uses a package that does the job; that really helped me to understand the algorithms better. | only little programming experience, the programming | Exercise | might be very time-consuming. I enjoyed | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Applications exercises are allocated within specific areas of larger scripts, which allows the student to complete small tasks that are still put into context of a general project. The lessons are well illustrated, and developing intuitions of the mathematical concepts is well facilitated | Applications | Exercise | are allocated within specific areas of | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, perfectly paced and detailed. The professor Andrew Ng succeeds in creating a comfortable atmosphere and is easy to follow. As a beginner in machine learning, I appreciated the fact that the contents cover the most important aspects of machine learning, without diving in too fast in the underlying mathematics and computational details. I think I need go deeper in these aspects now, but these lessons are rich of practical and methodological tips that i'm sure even advanced engineers would need. Last but not least, the Octave/Matlab hands-on exercises permit a deeper understanding of the algorithms, and to realize what remained misunderstood after the lectures. I am happy that I decided to start (and to end) this course. This was my first on Coursera : there will be others. Many thanks to Mr Ng, to the mentors that helped us on the discussion boards, and to the coursera team in general. Arnaud. | but not least, the Octave/Matlab hands-on | Exercise | permit a deeper understanding of the | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I enjoyed it like a child. I learnt a lot (it shows a lot of different subjects), the practices exercises are very fun (most of them)... The only bad thing I can say of the course is that it was made in 2011 and I do not know how many new things are missing. | lot of different subjects), the practices | Exercise | are very fun (most of them). | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good course. Good examples Excellent quiz and exercises Slides are also very clear and easy-understanding | course. Good examples Excellent quiz and | Exercise | Slides are also very clear and | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Easy to understand explanation. Good lab exercises that focuses only on the algorithms itself, while additional code is added to show you what you implemented. | Easy to understand explanation. Good lab | Exercise | that focuses only on the algorithms | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Contents are carefully organized with good exercises. The course covers the topics which are required to apply machine learning to real-world problems at basic levels. The topics are consistently addressed with motivation, theory, and implementation in order. The exercises are provided to teach the concepts of machine learning and their applications. Prof. Andrew Ng tried to eliminate technical barriers in writing codes in Matlab and let students understand the concepts fully. This class is the first choice of learning Machine Leaning for a self-driven learner. | Contents are carefully organized with good | Exercise | The course covers the topics which | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Contents are carefully organized with good exercises. The course covers the topics which are required to apply machine learning to real-world problems at basic levels. The topics are consistently addressed with motivation, theory, and implementation in order. The exercises are provided to teach the concepts of machine learning and their applications. Prof. Andrew Ng tried to eliminate technical barriers in writing codes in Matlab and let students understand the concepts fully. This class is the first choice of learning Machine Leaning for a self-driven learner. | theory, and implementation in order. The | Exercise | are provided to teach the concepts | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is practical.The "Machine Learning" learners can get training how to implement a part of AI algorithms dealing programming exercises. Harrison | part of AI algorithms dealing programming | Exercise | Harrison | Positive | 0.68 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am a beginner in Machine Learning. This course gives me very smooth transit for more challenging topics of ML. The exercises are really carefully designed to help me get a concrete idea of the learning algorithm and realization. Thank you, Andrew! | more challenging topics of ML. The | Exercise | are really carefully designed to help | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | "All you need to know about Machine Learning but didn't know whom to ask". Wonderful course! The quizzes and exercises are very well put together. | . Wonderful course! The quizzes and | Exercise | are very well put together. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I'm about 3/4 into the class. Before the start I knew close to nothing about the subject. Prof. Ng has done an outstanding job in presenting the subject, explaining the underlying theory, and assigning problems and exercises that deepened my understanding. He is a highly organized teacher and excellent pedagogue. Special thanks to the course TAs as well who are very responsive to comments and questions, and have prepared great materials that always helped me to completed the assignments. This is a textbook example of a great online class that is fun to attend. Well done! | underlying theory, and assigning problems and | Exercise | that deepened my understanding. He is | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting course, explaining the topics in a very easy way, with lots of practical exercises! Made me want to dig deeper into Machine Learning and try to find applications for my PhD in Quantitative Economics. | easy way, with lots of practical | Exercise | Made me want to dig deeper | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent material and videos gives good taste of what ML is. Exercises go to the point, which is also very good. | good taste of what ML is. | Exercise | go to the point, which is | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course ! Lectures, examples, exercises. | Great course ! Lectures, examples, | Exercise | | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course. Very clear lectures, and lots of interesting practical exercises. | lectures, and lots of interesting practical | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Prof. Ng explains everything super clear. He focuses much more on conceptual understanding than detailed mathematical derivations. All the MATLAB/Octave exercises are interesting and relevant. The best part is that all the peripheral coding is provided and one only needs to focus on implementing machine learning related core functions. Overall an excellent introductory course. | detailed mathematical derivations. All the MATLAB/Octave | Exercise | are interesting and relevant. The best | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome lecture content for beginner and intermediate student craving for the latest statistical skills. Exercises are well-designed and helpful to the learning experience. Definitely recommended! | craving for the latest statistical skills. | Exercise | are well-designed and helpful to the | Positive | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am really satisfied with the course. I'm really glad I stuck with it. Looking forward to putting it to practice. The way the course is organized is really good. It's amazing to look back in all the subjects studied and how each one is built on top of each other. It is also good how there is always a programming exercise that really makes you think about the content studied on that lesson. I think the videos really need some post production. Some videos could be shortened since there is repeated material: Andrew decides to restart the explanation, because he messed up or something, but the part the he messed up is still in the video. It would be good if the Wiki that is present in Week 1 could also be present in all other Weeks, so we as students could feel encouraged to write the Wiki of each Week. | how there is always a programming | Exercise | that really makes you think about | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course. The assignments especially the programming exercises are challenging and gives a head start into this complex world of machine learning. Need to keep practicing these algorithms to keep in touch with the knowledge learnt from this course. Highly recommend! | course. The assignments especially the programming | Exercise | are challenging and gives a head | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good exercises and simple to absorb | good | Exercise | and simple to absorb | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great high-level overview of a lot of topics! Every lecture was very well explained. The written assignments and programming exercises were a good balance between getting your hands dirty while still being paced that you could finish them all in a timely manner and finish the course with a busy schedule. I had fun! | explained. The written assignments and programming | Exercise | were a good balance between getting | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I really liked this course and the way exercise and assignments are created such that even a no-maths student can learn it. Thumbs up. | liked this course and the way | Exercise | and assignments are created such that | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I really enjoyed this course, particularly the programming exercises. I found it well thought-out and challenging in a really enjoyable way. Thank you very much! | enjoyed this course, particularly the programming | Exercise | I found it well thought-out and | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The lectures are great, and they are reinforced with the quizzes and programming exercises. The quizzes need critical thinking to get all of them correctly. The programming assignments are there to cover the basic concepts. The way the course it taught is suited for online courses. The topics are well-divided in short chunks, making it easier to watch the lectures at different times of the day. There are some mistakes on the English subtitles, but it doesn't hinder the learning. Overall, a well-taught course. | reinforced with the quizzes and programming | Exercise | The quizzes need critical thinking to | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course offers informative lectures with good explanations, a set of quizzes with well-posed questions and even programming exercises that are evaluated online using Octave. Highly recommended! | with well-posed questions and even programming | Exercise | that are evaluated online using Octave. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is really a great introductory course to machine learning. The explanation is very clear and the exercises are all well-designed. Thank you very much for creating this course! | explanation is very clear and the | Exercise | are all well-designed. Thank you very | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I thought that Machine Learning is a very dificult matter, and I still think that, but I'd like to say that I have learned about machine learning in a very easy way with this course. It has a lot of practical exercise where you can see what are you learning. Teacher talk and explain very good. | It has a lot of practical | Exercise | where you can see what are | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng explains the complex subject of machine learning very well and provides ample programming exercises to practice coding. | very well and provides ample programming | Exercise | to practice coding. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a very interesting course, which gives a good overview of this new field. Also the exercises are very illustrating and helpful to gain deeper knowledge. | of this new field. Also the | Exercise | are very illustrating and helpful to | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course with great hands-on exercises for practice and deeper learning. | Excellent course with great hands-on | Exercise | for practice and deeper learning. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first on line course and the experience has been amazing. The lectures by Prof Andrew Ng were clear and the follow up programming exercises helped reinforce and enhance the concepts covered in the lectures. The entire course was very well organized - videos, notes, discussion groups, suggestions and tips by the mentors was very easy to follow. The focus of this course is on the practical application of machine learning techniques (supervised learning mostly but also some non supervised learning). Prof Andrew tries not to get into the advanced mathematical concepts but instead provides good intuition and then shows one how to apply the different ideas underpinning machine learning with some practical examples. In my view, this is an excellent way to quickly become familiar the concepts and to see machine learning in action. A student of the course will gain very good insights and can then follow up with the underlying math as needed. The final two lectures on how to scale machine learning to large systems and a suggested systematic framework for figuring out which aspects of the design to focus on were very instructive. In summary, i would highly recommend this course to anyone interested in the area of machine learning. Be prepared to work through some challenging (but very worthwhile) programming exercises to get the most out of the course. | clear and the follow up programming | Exercise | helped reinforce and enhance the concepts | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first on line course and the experience has been amazing. The lectures by Prof Andrew Ng were clear and the follow up programming exercises helped reinforce and enhance the concepts covered in the lectures. The entire course was very well organized - videos, notes, discussion groups, suggestions and tips by the mentors was very easy to follow. The focus of this course is on the practical application of machine learning techniques (supervised learning mostly but also some non supervised learning). Prof Andrew tries not to get into the advanced mathematical concepts but instead provides good intuition and then shows one how to apply the different ideas underpinning machine learning with some practical examples. In my view, this is an excellent way to quickly become familiar the concepts and to see machine learning in action. A student of the course will gain very good insights and can then follow up with the underlying math as needed. The final two lectures on how to scale machine learning to large systems and a suggested systematic framework for figuring out which aspects of the design to focus on were very instructive. In summary, i would highly recommend this course to anyone interested in the area of machine learning. Be prepared to work through some challenging (but very worthwhile) programming exercises to get the most out of the course. | some challenging (but very worthwhile) programming | Exercise | to get the most out of | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is the best Machine Learning class I ever took, after taking several ML classes in real life and online. Unlike most other ML courses focusing on math, this class specifically emphasizes on how to analyze/debug a system. The programming exercises are extremely well-organized and helpful in implementing the algorithms and debug the performance problems. The instructor is doing a fantastic job in making things clear to people from all background. The videos may seem long and the programming exercises take a long time to complete. But the effort is so worth it. | to analyze/debug a system. The programming | Exercise | are extremely well-organized and helpful in | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is the best Machine Learning class I ever took, after taking several ML classes in real life and online. Unlike most other ML courses focusing on math, this class specifically emphasizes on how to analyze/debug a system. The programming exercises are extremely well-organized and helpful in implementing the algorithms and debug the performance problems. The instructor is doing a fantastic job in making things clear to people from all background. The videos may seem long and the programming exercises take a long time to complete. But the effort is so worth it. | may seem long and the programming | Exercise | take a long time to complete. | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Crystal clear and well paced lectures, good coverage of several interesting topics, amusing exercises. Thanks professor Ng and TAs. | coverage of several interesting topics, amusing | Exercise | Thanks professor Ng and TAs. | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | High Level Course! The topics are explained with great competence and exercises in Matlab are really useful. | are explained with great competence and | Exercise | in Matlab are really useful. | Positive | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing course, Professor Ng is very knowledgeable and a great teacher. Complex concepts in ML were explained thoroughly and patiently, and the exercises are fun and well constructed. | explained thoroughly and patiently, and the | Exercise | are fun and well constructed. | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good balance between theory and hands on exercises. Very enjoyable. | balance between theory and hands on | Exercise | Very enjoyable. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Concepts are very clearly explained. Programming exercises are really helpful. If only a more technical counterpart of this course is available. | Concepts are very clearly explained. Programming | Exercise | are really helpful. If only a | Negative | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | All-rounded, simple, beginner-friendly, well-designed exercises, good lecturer | All-rounded, simple, beginner-friendly, well-designed | Exercise | good lecturer | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The exercises lead you to the edge of a cliff, then push you off. No guidance. Good luck if you don't already know linear algebra, matrix math, and matlab. I'll be looking elsewhere to learn about Machine Learning. Glad I didn't pay for this course! | The | Exercise | lead you to the edge of | Positive | 0.93 | 1.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first coursera class, and I came out feeling confident in my use of the methods that Prof. Ng taught. The programming exercises do a very good job of guiding students through the implementational details of each learning method and usually provide examples to illustrate the strengths, weaknesses, and options within each. I'm a graduate student in a protein structure/rational drug design lab, and the topics from this class have already weaved their way into my projects. These methods are applicable to almost any quantitative form of data - I strongly recommend this course for other young researchers, either to prepare to implement the methods themselves, or to just start thinking about how to format the conventions of their sceintific domain in a machine-learnable way! | that Prof. Ng taught. The programming | Exercise | do a very good job of | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, completely recommended. Explains very well, and the exercise really help you understand. Gives quite enough real world examples to understand the use of what you are learning. | recommended. Explains very well, and the | Exercise | really help you understand. Gives quite | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An excellent course! - easy to understand, programming exercises focus on the implementation of key ideas which saves lots of time in coding. | course! - easy to understand, programming | Exercise | focus on the implementation of key | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Prof. Andrew Ng's presentation is pretty intuitive and effective. For me I've almost forgotten the Linear Algebraic after graduated for years, but it is still easy to 100% understood what he taught. The exercises are also designed very practical for us to better understand the lectures, and I think I can deploy them for my future work as well. This learning series is really helpful and seems open an window for me to understand Machine Learning, since I thought it would be very very hard to understand before attended this series. By now, I am proudly to say that I am in the room of this great discipline. I really appreciate Prof. Andrew Ng's effort as well as the support team. | 100% understood what he taught. The | Exercise | are also designed very practical for | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good, you can learn important concepts, the course is plenty of exercises and practice, But even better you can have recognition for work and, like in my case, get new contracts and clients. | concepts, the course is plenty of | Exercise | and practice, But even better you | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content, well documented, good exercises and scripts for work submission | Great content, well documented, good | Exercise | and scripts for work submission | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a perfect fundamental course for machine learning. It's really recommended for people who are interested with this subject but fear for the mathematics it might involve. Professor Andrew NG made all related algorithm easy to understand and interesting. Besides, the programming exercise are very considerate, you can learn a lot from practice. | understand and interesting. Besides, the programming | Exercise | are very considerate, you can learn | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | At the beginning, I thought it would be hard for a starter in ML; however, during the process, I found the course setting is easy to follow, especially the quiz, which help me master the key point of each class. And the programming exercises give me the intuition in applying each individual ML skills. I think the course settings are convenient and practical. So after finishing the course, I have excuse to recommend other ML beginners to join the course, which will help to build a skeleton of the knowledge about the concept, algorithm, and skills in ML. AND thank Andrew and Coursera for giving such an practical guidance. The suggestion at last what I want to append is providing some further courses or future direction after this course. However, maybe I can get them from the course forum. | of each class. And the programming | Exercise | give me the intuition in applying | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Easy to understand and bunch of exercises! | Easy to understand and bunch of | Exercise | | Negative | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course presentation is simple and easy to digest with some hints about where the complexity exist. The exercises also well designed to lead student to the right direction without worrying too much about implementation detail that support the main topics. I usually focus in the wrong direction while learning something new. This trap is frustrating, but this course is really enjoyable. Thank you for making this course. | about where the complexity exist. The | Exercise | also well designed to lead student | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | My first coursera course. I've taken others since but this has been head and shoulders above them. Very interesting, very informative and at just the right level for me. Don't skip the exercises, they can be tough but I found they really cemented my learning. | level for me. Don't skip the | Exercise | they can be tough but I | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well explained. Very interesting and usefull exercises. Thank you very much for the effort! | well explained. Very interesting and usefull | Exercise | Thank you very much for the | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Learned a cool lot especially diagnostic methods for bias-variance issues. I enjoyed doing the programming exercises. The last lecture was very essential where you get to see how to build ML pipeline for one whole project and also the ceiling analysis discussed along with it. Prof Ng is indeed pro in the field. | issues. I enjoyed doing the programming | Exercise | The last lecture was very essential | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course for beginners in Machine Learning. Programming exercises can be a little more complex | for beginners in Machine Learning. Programming | Exercise | can be a little more complex | Positive | 0.91 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I had previously learned some of this material in previous courses I had taken years ago in Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence, however this course provided a much better explanation on how and why these techniques work. The concise presentation style of the mathematics, the inclusion of system design in the syllabus, and the construction of the practical exercises (using Matlab) were all very well done and much appreciated. | and the construction of the practical | Exercise | (using Matlab) were all very well | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The programming exercises were too structured and the course was quite easy. | The programming | Exercise | were too structured and the course | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Extremely good course to start with machine learning. Clears basic concepts without going into too much detail which makes it ideal for students with no background in calculus. Also, the structure and content is well organized and topics are not rushed upon. You not only learn algorithms but also best practrices to follow to achieve better accuracy. The programming exercises are also really good. All of this makes coupled with the helpful Coursera community to guide you when you are stuck- up with a problem makes it an ideal course to start learning machine learning. | to achieve better accuracy. The programming | Exercise | are also really good. All of | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really cool class! Well put together with very manageable exercises. Would have liked to get more insight into actual machine learning systems out there. | Well put together with very manageable | Exercise | Would have liked to get more | Positive | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course that lives up to its reputation as a great introduction to Machine Learning. You'll learn a lot of the relevant concepts via lectures and apply them through the quizzes and programming exercises. Basic programming knowledge would be helpful, but no deep statistical / computer science / linear algebra background is required to fully enjoy the course. I've taken formal Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence classes as a CS undergrad and still found this course to be very useful in both refreshing and learning concepts. Thank you Dr. Ng! | them through the quizzes and programming | Exercise | Basic programming knowledge would be helpful, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really well structured and pedagogical course! I really enjoyed it even though I would have liked it to be a bit more technical. I think a bit too much is supplied in the programming exercises and I would have preferred more mathematical proofs and derivations in the lectures. | much is supplied in the programming | Exercise | and I would have preferred more | Negative | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well designed course covering all the topics on the subject. The quizzes and matlab exercises ensure that you know and understand the details of each step. Full of practical suggestions during implementation and provides a guided approach to check/improve your model. | the subject. The quizzes and matlab | Exercise | ensure that you know and understand | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good introduction to machine learning although the later exercises were quite easy. Once you get through the neural net back propagation section, there really isn't much of a challenge left. That said, you do get a good sense of how the various algorithms are implemented and can self-study from there. | to machine learning although the later | Exercise | were quite easy. Once you get | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Sir, The course is excellent but is it possible to give some solved programming exercise please | possible to give some solved programming | Exercise | please | Negative | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent 11 week course, highly recommended and with real world relevance.. Very knowledgeable and personable lecturer is an effective communicator. Tutors are helpful and responsive. Informative discussions forum and helpful tutorial guidance and useful test cases. Guided programming exercises with Octave/Matlab in which the authors have done most of the grunt work, leaving the student to fill in a few critical bits. The only down side was that the course changed from being uncertified to certified, about 80% of the way through. Would need to redo/resubmit virtually all assessments in order to qualify for certification, which is a fair amount of time/effort, that I'm not sure that I can spare. | and useful test cases. Guided programming | Exercise | with Octave/Matlab in which the authors | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great course ! The pacing is just right. Andrew covers each topic in very easily digestible bits and is very careful to not overwhelm beginners. I find this technique incredibly refreshing and open and welcoming. It is all too easy for professors to act like elites in their ivory towers and make you feel foolish for not knowing enough but Andrew is the opposite of that and actively encourages you to push through difficult topics by focusing on the high level details first and leaving it up to you to research the details on your own. The programming exercises are set up so that all the distracting details are all coded already and it's up to you to fill in only the parts that are directly relevant to the topic you are learning. There's only one exercise that is slightly confusing but it's easy to get help on it in the forums if there's a helpful moderator like Tom Mosher around ! Highly recommended. | details on your own. The programming | Exercise | are set up so that all | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great course ! The pacing is just right. Andrew covers each topic in very easily digestible bits and is very careful to not overwhelm beginners. I find this technique incredibly refreshing and open and welcoming. It is all too easy for professors to act like elites in their ivory towers and make you feel foolish for not knowing enough but Andrew is the opposite of that and actively encourages you to push through difficult topics by focusing on the high level details first and leaving it up to you to research the details on your own. The programming exercises are set up so that all the distracting details are all coded already and it's up to you to fill in only the parts that are directly relevant to the topic you are learning. There's only one exercise that is slightly confusing but it's easy to get help on it in the forums if there's a helpful moderator like Tom Mosher around ! Highly recommended. | you are learning. There's only one | Exercise | that is slightly confusing but it's | Negative | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The programming exercises aren't really all that challenging...just implement the formulas provided in the course or in the assignment itself, and you're mostly done. I hate the questions on the quizzes that are "Select all the following that are true..." The only questions I ever got wrong on quizzes were of that sort. | The programming | Exercise | aren't really all that challenging. . | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The concepts are explained masterfully with a focus on understanding rather than high-level mathematics which most of these topics invariably deal with. Plus the exercises give a real feel for the practical questions that Machine Learning can solve and the method that practitioners use most often. | topics invariably deal with. Plus the | Exercise | give a real feel for the | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A practical course by a capable professor. Too simple in terms of theoretical aspects, but Prof. Ng is very good at making abstract concepts and methodologies easy to follow and understand. Great course as an introductory to Machine Learning. If you are interested, and want to learn more about the proof and in-depth mathematics behind, go to Stanford's site for this course. There are lecture notes, slides and exercises that students use when taking the course at Stanford. | There are lecture notes, slides and | Exercise | that students use when taking the | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Extremely good introduction and overview of up-to-date machine learning methods. Andrew had simple and clear explanations and the exercises were challenging, not overwhelming, well-structured, and allowed the students to apply the relevant theory without being burdened by creating their own test programs or mastering the programming/scripting language. | simple and clear explanations and the | Exercise | were challenging, not overwhelming, well-structured, and | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | First of all, this course is a quality product: lectures are clear and effective and exercises are challenging enough. Perhaps the conclusion "now you can consider yourself an expert in machine learning techniques" is a slight exaggeration but, certainly, you are made aware of those techniques enough to think about using them effectively and getting some results. And, as an added bonus, you will learn the basics of Octave/MATLAB, which is not a bad thing since, as stated in the course, they are great prototyping tools. It's certainly a recommended course for whoever deals with data analysis problems, where perhaps a killer machine learning system is not the priority but some solid conclusions about the data are essential. | lectures are clear and effective and | Exercise | are challenging enough. Perhaps the conclusion | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Good balance between lectures and exercises. | course. Good balance between lectures and | Exercise | | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course to begin with machine learning. DO complete the exercises! They are the essence of this course. | with machine learning. DO complete the | Exercise | They are the essence of this | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is simply amazing, all the content from the video lessons, through the quizzes and the programming exercises are really well done, and also, there are really good mentors helping on the Discussion areas. If one with the will to really dive into these complex things to extract knowledge, I assure you, you will. The course is well made, but doesn't mean it's easy. I questioned myself through a lot of times in the beginning if I really was capable of learning all of this stuff. But I didn't give up, and well, this might be one of the most important decisions I've made in my life. This course aroused in me the passion to carry this knowledge, and keep improving it through my career. | through the quizzes and the programming | Exercise | are really well done, and also, | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I thought this was an excellent course and only have positive feedback for it. The lecture contents were interesting and well tied to exercise questions and programming assignments. The programming assignments were challenging overall but forced me to really learn the details of each machine learning algorithm. When things got a little too frustrating, such as for the neural network backpropagation assignment, the forums provided ample direction for me to move forward. | were interesting and well tied to | Exercise | questions and programming assignments. The programming | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good introduction to the subject. Holds your hand through the programming exercises, which is good for people with little background in programming. | Holds your hand through the programming | Exercise | which is good for people with | Positive | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very insightful. You're not just learning the algorithms themselves but also smart ways for choosing the right parameters values (which I found most valuable). The programming exercises are some what challenging but much fun to do. Kudos to Andrew for the material. | I found most valuable). The programming | Exercise | are some what challenging but much | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, well explained, good practical exercises, I am loving it. | good course, well explained, good practical | Exercise | I am loving it. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent place to begin learning on machine learning. The course's quizzes as well as coding exercise are challenging enough to keep oneself going. It covers a variety of topics with an amazing lucidness and depth. I really enjoyed the course. | course's quizzes as well as coding | Exercise | are challenging enough to keep oneself | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A really well structured and comprehensive course on Machine Learning. The programming exercises are really well documented, explaining each and every details and are also provide hands on experience on making Machine Learning codes. | course on Machine Learning. The programming | Exercise | are really well documented, explaining each | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | All the course is very, very interesting and inspiring. I just would like to explore and practice more some optimization routines we used on some programming exercises. I also would like to watch at least some words of frequent itemset mining. IMHO, it is a relevant mining task very useful in some real problems. Congratulations to prof. Andrew and all of his team/staff. | routines we used on some programming | Exercise | I also would like to watch | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Professor Andrew got five stars! This course is awesome. Describes several the theories and practices about machine learning, using valuable videos and exercises. High recommend. | machine learning, using valuable videos and | Exercise | High recommend. | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great introduction to Machine Learning! It was really simple to follow. For the practical exercises however, I struggled a bit with the programming language itself rather than with the actual algorithm implementation. It would be also good to have a list of recommended readings. | simple to follow. For the practical | Exercise | however, I struggled a bit with | Positive | 0.87 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | expected solution. f. expecting feedback on | Exercise | . . . not only correct | Negative | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is great fun. The lectures are easy to understand and the exercises are excellent for understanding and thinking through the practical implementations of the contents without having to deal with the implications of loading the data properly and coming up with tests for your functions. | are easy to understand and the | Exercise | are excellent for understanding and thinking | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is more an exercise in flexing Ivy vernacular than it is actually teaching. The learning curve is too steep to be useful to the majority of potential registrants. You're interested in this course either to (a) learn something about an exciting and ever changing field and/or (b) to have the Stanford logo on your LinkedIn profile. In both cases, move on. The curve is far too steep to be useful or to merit the countless additional hours of background learning the course should have done to bridge the gap. | The course is more an | Exercise | in flexing Ivy vernacular than it | Positive | 0.63 | 1.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introductory course to Machine learning, though later parts of the course seemed to be rushed-through a little. Practical exercises were really great. | to be rushed-through a little. Practical | Exercise | were really great. | Positive | 0.87 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course is well defined. Exercises are good to learn about what we saw in the videos. Thanks teacher!! | Course is well defined. | Exercise | are good to learn about what | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An amazing opportunity for an interactive and well structured learning about Machine Learning. The mixture between video classes and exercises was extremely well designed. Congratulations! | The mixture between video classes and | Exercise | was extremely well designed. Congratulations! | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is an excellent course! It is the second time I take this course and it is getting better with each session. The material is explained very clearly and the concepts are easy to understand. The exercises are challenging and really make you think. All the necessary programs are provided and all you need is the will to learn. Kudos and a big thank you to the professor and to his excellent team! | concepts are easy to understand. The | Exercise | are challenging and really make you | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Dr Andrew Ang is doing a great job of explaining a very complex problems in a very simple and understandable way. It's not an easy course, especially the exercises. The force you to take that theory you've just learn and apply it to real practical exercises, that's never an easy task :-). That's why this course is so good. | not an easy course, especially the | Exercise | The force you to take that | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Dr Andrew Ang is doing a great job of explaining a very complex problems in a very simple and understandable way. It's not an easy course, especially the exercises. The force you to take that theory you've just learn and apply it to real practical exercises, that's never an easy task :-). That's why this course is so good. | and apply it to real practical | Exercise | that's never an easy task :-). | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It would be great if there are more exercises to fix the concept, but great course! | be great if there are more | Exercise | to fix the concept, but great | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Contents, videos, quizzes and programming exercises are very well contrived and conducted. I learnt a lot. | course. Contents, videos, quizzes and programming | Exercise | are very well contrived and conducted. | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The best thing, just after the course when I see the stars to rate the course ML algorithm goes in my mind (Hehe). Super awesome course, right from the basics to deeper. Videos and topics are split in right pieces to keep it interesting. Interesting real world problems solved in programming exercises. | real world problems solved in programming | Exercise | | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lots of great information, a good introduction to machine learning algorithms. I feel confident I can apply what I've learned to real problems and systems. Main complaint is I wish there were more programming exercises on applying ML algorithms to real problems and less on implementing the algorithms that in reality I'm probably going to just use from a library like scikit-learn. | I wish there were more programming | Exercise | on applying ML algorithms to real | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course. Gives you a great kick start to the theme. Programming exercises guide you through basics of ML and give good practice experience. | kick start to the theme. Programming | Exercise | guide you through basics of ML | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good introduction. I liked most the fact that the videos are short, and the exercises are very well designed. | the videos are short, and the | Exercise | are very well designed. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best machine learning course that doesn't require any pre-requisite in machine learning. Exercises to test the concepts could be dynamic ( like GRE/GMAT ). Coding exercise made me implement the theory and that's what made this class different from other machine learning classes. One thing that I believe is missing is that future course of action/material for people who want to continue to learn more. | require any pre-requisite in machine learning. | Exercise | to test the concepts could be | Negative | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best machine learning course that doesn't require any pre-requisite in machine learning. Exercises to test the concepts could be dynamic ( like GRE/GMAT ). Coding exercise made me implement the theory and that's what made this class different from other machine learning classes. One thing that I believe is missing is that future course of action/material for people who want to continue to learn more. | dynamic ( like GRE/GMAT ). Coding | Exercise | made me implement the theory and | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good lecture videos and very good exercises. | Good lecture videos and very good | Exercise | | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great introductory course. Should be learnt in conjunction with another textbook. Prof. Andrew Ng covers a lot of concepts. Some videos though may seem like repetition should be viewed again to understand the concepts advocated by him. I have found it very useful to attend live ML/AI lectures/meetups and then talk to people about this course and discuss some specific topics. It is amazing how much Prof Ng has covered in the videos and exercises. | has covered in the videos and | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, very well explained with a lot of examples and intuitions. The practical exercises are very well structured to make you think of what you were taught in the class. The teacher explains every part very well with a lot of examples and real case scenarios. If you want to start learning artificial intelligence this is the place to be. There are many algorithms you are taught and many good practices that should be applied to this algorithms to make them effective and performant. Something nice to have, would be the written courses or some paperback with the main ideas, but the videos are downloadable which fills this gap pretty good. Overall this is a nice course and you definitely should attend it if you're new to machine learning or want to better consolidate your knowledge. | of examples and intuitions. The practical | Exercise | are very well structured to make | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course ! Good choice of topics, great explanations, I liked that there are many practical tips. I would have liked: less guided programming exercises (the solution was almost given in the comments in the file to write) and larger (the student has to write only small bits of the overall project). I would also have liked recommended links or reading whenever a proof or an explanation of a mathematical result was skipped. I think the choice of what was skipped as too detailed for an intro was good, but would have been nice to have pointers for students who wanted to explore more. | would have liked: less guided programming | Exercise | (the solution was almost given in | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Concepts were explained very well and the hands on exercises helped to gain confidence in implementing some of the algorithms. This course is simply magical in transforming a person who is new to machine learning into an expert. I have already started applying machine learning techniques in real life problems. Thanks to Stanford University and Mr. Andrew for providing such high quality content. | very well and the hands on | Exercise | helped to gain confidence in implementing | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very clear explanation. Great assignment exercises. Help you understand the basics of Machine Learning. | Very clear explanation. Great assignment | Exercise | Help you understand the basics of | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Probably the best course for an introduction on machine learning. I would recommend it to anyone that has a slight interest on this subject. The course itself is very enjoyable , the programming exercises are very self-motivating and worth the time. | is very enjoyable , the programming | Exercise | are very self-motivating and worth the | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Done the first two weeks and loving it so far, really interesting, very well explained and the exercises keep you on your toes. | interesting, very well explained and the | Exercise | keep you on your toes. | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is really the best course I have seen so far. A lot of effort has been put into the material and exercise to quantum leap understanding of machine learning. Andrew Ng can be very very proud of this course. Hope he will find the time to maybe make a more advanced course as well. | been put into the material and | Exercise | to quantum leap understanding of machine | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Challenging, but the instructor walk through from the theory to the practical exercises and make you feel comfortable. I have re-learn algebra and the assignments are well designed to make you success, that means, understand what are you doing and why. The only issue are some technical problemas I have to submit. Thanks for this great course! | from the theory to the practical | Exercise | and make you feel comfortable. I | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent introduction to Machine Learning. The course is specifically suited for beginners. So If something you read or heard raised your interest in machine learning and wanted to learn it, this is the perfect introductory course for that. It was a pleasure to learn from Andrew Ng. The course uses Octave/Matlab for the programming exercises, but hopefully they will change it to python as it's better suited for beginners. Thank you Andrew and thank you to everyone who worked on this inspiring course. | course uses Octave/Matlab for the programming | Exercise | but hopefully they will change it | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is the best online course I've ever watched without a doubt! ( including many youtube videos, online content in many different formats etc and coursera). It's very well laid out with real-world practical exercise after every lecture! Andrew Ng really did a great job with this course. I recommend this course to everyone interested in ML ! | well laid out with real-world practical | Exercise | after every lecture! Andrew Ng really | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | My review concerns partially the course and partially the Coursera concept as this was my first on-line course and I cannot distinguish between those two.My experience was simply great, I felt that it was time well spend, for example compares to my company provided trainings and I'm hoping to return to another course.I have quite strong background in statistics so some parts were too basic for me but being able to speed the videos up is neat and it opens the course to wide spectrum of students (again opposed to company provided trainings or even school lessons where in the best case half of the students are bored of the slow tempo and other half isn't able to keep up with the same tempo). To have my own timeplan also helps but I even finished quite early as it was so fun.About the course contend: Andrew Ng prepared great lessons, all was pretty well explained (even when he cannot use some "advanced math" not to lose part of the students). The examples were illustrative as well as realistic (at least seemed realistic and that makes it more exciting than some artificial ones).I was little afraid of the programming exercises as I've never worked with Matlab (using mainly R). But now I'm glad that I know another language:) The system of submitting works perfectly.I can say similar thinks about the contend of the exercises as I wrote about examples in lectures. It is nice to program my own spam filter - the concept of programming only some small parts of the program and not to have to deal with data loading, plotting... is again very entertaining and instructive and then it can be done some nice application in short time.My thanks to the whole Coursera team and of course Andrew Ng. Hope to use this cool tools in my work. Zdeněk | was little afraid of the programming | Exercise | as I've never worked with Matlab | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | My review concerns partially the course and partially the Coursera concept as this was my first on-line course and I cannot distinguish between those two.My experience was simply great, I felt that it was time well spend, for example compares to my company provided trainings and I'm hoping to return to another course.I have quite strong background in statistics so some parts were too basic for me but being able to speed the videos up is neat and it opens the course to wide spectrum of students (again opposed to company provided trainings or even school lessons where in the best case half of the students are bored of the slow tempo and other half isn't able to keep up with the same tempo). To have my own timeplan also helps but I even finished quite early as it was so fun.About the course contend: Andrew Ng prepared great lessons, all was pretty well explained (even when he cannot use some "advanced math" not to lose part of the students). The examples were illustrative as well as realistic (at least seemed realistic and that makes it more exciting than some artificial ones).I was little afraid of the programming exercises as I've never worked with Matlab (using mainly R). But now I'm glad that I know another language:) The system of submitting works perfectly.I can say similar thinks about the contend of the exercises as I wrote about examples in lectures. It is nice to program my own spam filter - the concept of programming only some small parts of the program and not to have to deal with data loading, plotting... is again very entertaining and instructive and then it can be done some nice application in short time.My thanks to the whole Coursera team and of course Andrew Ng. Hope to use this cool tools in my work. Zdeněk | thinks about the contend of the | Exercise | as I wrote about examples in | Negative | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very clear explanation and exercises in order to start with Machine learning | Very clear explanation and | Exercise | in order to start with Machine | Negative | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course! The ideas of every topics are well conveyed, and the programming exercises are great fun. I did get what I expected in this course. Thank you Prof. Ng for sharing your knowledge! | are well conveyed, and the programming | Exercise | are great fun. I did get | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course and the teaching is very clear. The exercises and experiences are good for practice. | the teaching is very clear. The | Exercise | and experiences are good for practice. | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course covers the main topics of Machine Learning. The tool chosen for the exercises (Octave) is very easy to learn and very powerful for the purpose of ML, especially if you use vectors as suggested on the course. I found it to be the right mix of theory and practic | Learning. The tool chosen for the | Exercise | (Octave) is very easy to learn | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very nice class. Detail class and exercise notes. Very instrumental. | Very nice class. Detail class and | Exercise | notes. Very instrumental. | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really great course. Nice and prepared programming exercises. | great course. Nice and prepared programming | Exercise | | Positive | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Nicely written, good exercises. | Nicely written, good | Exercise | | Positive | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class is excellent on its own, but I'm taking it after having taken the 9-course sequence on Data Science from Johns Hopkins, which gave me a good foundation upon which to better understand this deeper dive into Machine Learning than what is presented in the 4-week course from JH on the same topic. Andrew Ng is presenting the material beautifully and understandably. The quizzes and the exercises complement the class lecture material quite well and both help cement the concepts presented. | and understandably. The quizzes and the | Exercise | complement the class lecture material quite | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course. The examples were clear, the exercises to the point, maths just right. I watched all the videos on 2x. The teacher has deep knowledge and industry experience. Amazing course - highly recommended. | course. The examples were clear, the | Exercise | to the point, maths just right. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is perfectly designed and give an intuition on how machine learning works in application. The exercises especially the programming assignments, helps apply the knowledge and see the result and helps understanding the concepts. Kudos! | machine learning works in application. The | Exercise | especially the programming assignments, helps apply | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | great lectures by the amazing andrew ng, with fun and very interresting exercises | ng, with fun and very interresting | Exercise | | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It can be more interactive if small exercises are followed by each video as in edx. | can be more interactive if small | Exercise | are followed by each video as | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Epic class on machine learning. One of the best and most inspiring MOOC's I've followed. Do the programming exercises. They are well worth the time and effort. | MOOC's I've followed. Do the programming | Exercise | They are well worth the time | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The Good: This course is a good introduction to fundamental topics and basic techniques in machine learning. I feel that the biggest strength of this course comes from Prof. Ng's suggestions for how to design and improve machine learning systems in practice. The Bad: This course is a few years old, and there are a lot of errors in the videos and even occasionally in the programming exercises as well. In my opinion, there is a little too much hand-holding in the programming exercises, so that while I was able to implement the important bits and pieces of the algorithms, I didn't get much chance to practice the more difficult task of organizing the entire system. The Ambiguous: This course is *very* light on the math, perhaps as light as you could possibly get. I imagine this is a relief for a lot of people, but personally I felt annoyed and even a little patronized with the number of times Prof. Ng said that we "don't have to worry" about the mathematical details of different concepts and algorithms. It's fine to skip over derivations and details for the sake of a simple presentation or to emphasize practical application, but surely it is important to go back and see what all this stuff means eventually. I will certainly be looking for other courses on machine learning that give a more mathematical treatment, and I think that anyone who wants to seriously get into ML should probably do the same. On a related note, Prof. Ng takes his time in each video, speaking slowly, repeating different points, and carefully explicating formulas with examples. For some people that may be good, but I found myself frequently skipping ahead in videos because I just wanted to get to the point. | and even occasionally in the programming | Exercise | as well. In my opinion, there | Positive | 0.88 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The Good: This course is a good introduction to fundamental topics and basic techniques in machine learning. I feel that the biggest strength of this course comes from Prof. Ng's suggestions for how to design and improve machine learning systems in practice. The Bad: This course is a few years old, and there are a lot of errors in the videos and even occasionally in the programming exercises as well. In my opinion, there is a little too much hand-holding in the programming exercises, so that while I was able to implement the important bits and pieces of the algorithms, I didn't get much chance to practice the more difficult task of organizing the entire system. The Ambiguous: This course is *very* light on the math, perhaps as light as you could possibly get. I imagine this is a relief for a lot of people, but personally I felt annoyed and even a little patronized with the number of times Prof. Ng said that we "don't have to worry" about the mathematical details of different concepts and algorithms. It's fine to skip over derivations and details for the sake of a simple presentation or to emphasize practical application, but surely it is important to go back and see what all this stuff means eventually. I will certainly be looking for other courses on machine learning that give a more mathematical treatment, and I think that anyone who wants to seriously get into ML should probably do the same. On a related note, Prof. Ng takes his time in each video, speaking slowly, repeating different points, and carefully explicating formulas with examples. For some people that may be good, but I found myself frequently skipping ahead in videos because I just wanted to get to the point. | too much hand-holding in the programming | Exercise | so that while I was able | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great videos, medium difficulty programming exercises with detailed instructions, even for beginners. | Great videos, medium difficulty programming | Exercise | with detailed instructions, even for beginners. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good insight to machine learning algorithms, easy formulations and good visualizations, lots of topics and exercises that help to understand the theory | good visualizations, lots of topics and | Exercise | that help to understand the theory | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| gvw1-gKyEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | The theory explained and the exercises are not at the same level. | The theory explained and the | Exercise | are not at the same level. | Negative | 0.68 | 1.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Some exercises need some improvement. Tests were not that helpful and the instruction to the last homework was quite bad (many open questions). | Some | Exercise | need some improvement. Tests were not | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Very good introduction to the topic. Examples and programming exercises were very good, although last assignment was visibly less polished than earlier ones. | to the topic. Examples and programming | Exercise | were very good, although last assignment | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | A clear and direct way, teaches the parallel programming framework for Scala. With all the proposed approach and exercises helped me to get a better view of language. And his power of abstraction in the surrounding context. | With all the proposed approach and | Exercise | helped me to get a better | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Excellent intro to the computational challenges in analyzing genomic sequences. Lectures and programming exercises explain algorithms very clearly even for beginners. | analyzing genomic sequences. Lectures and programming | Exercise | explain algorithms very clearly even for | Negative | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Quizzes are useful exercises but need to do a lot of self studying. | Quizzes are useful | Exercise | but need to do a lot | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really good class. I think there were some small issues with the class project. Like all real world problems it was not entirely well specified and the data was a bit odd to use for a prediction exercise because it was time series data. | odd to use for a prediction | Exercise | because it was time series data. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Wish to have more systematic structure, detail information and hands-on exercises. | systematic structure, detail information and hands-on | Exercise | | Positive | 0.77 | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Great hands-on exercises to boost understanding and develop required skills... | Great hands-on | Exercise | to boost understanding and develop required | Positive | 0.93 | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Great course! Very nice intro into GIS. Everything explained very thoroughly with visual examples and practical exercises. Many thanks to Nick Santos and University of California, Davis for creating this specialization. | thoroughly with visual examples and practical | Exercise | Many thanks to Nick Santos and | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | This was a fantastic class. The instructor and those that constructed the lectures, exercises, quizzes and projects managed to put so much into very efficient, but complete packages that are really well organized. I was able to watch some on my phone, some on my tablet and many on my PC. Instruction was very clear and valuable. The exercises were great. The project at the end was challenging and interesting. I look forward to the next class in this specialization. | and those that constructed the lectures, | Exercise | quizzes and projects managed to put | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | This was a fantastic class. The instructor and those that constructed the lectures, exercises, quizzes and projects managed to put so much into very efficient, but complete packages that are really well organized. I was able to watch some on my phone, some on my tablet and many on my PC. Instruction was very clear and valuable. The exercises were great. The project at the end was challenging and interesting. I look forward to the next class in this specialization. | was very clear and valuable. The | Exercise | were great. The project at the | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | This is extraordinary Course for all of us seeking GIS training. It is clear, understandable even for foreigners with limited knowledge of English. I like exercises which are well developed and lead us through the software. | limited knowledge of English. I like | Exercise | which are well developed and lead | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It consists mostly of video lectures there is a lack of coding exercises | there is a lack of coding | Exercise | | Negative | 0.82 | 2.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The teaching is very clear. It will be better if there are more tests. Exercises are important in coding. | better if there are more tests. | Exercise | are important in coding. | Negative | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | All three parts (html css and javascript) covered by this course are well taught. It is targets beginners very well. I especially like the way how javascript is introduced -- in contrast to normal programming language courses which start with grammar, here it starts with examples. This way one can very fast already start programming something, which is much more interesting. Also the quizzes, exercises and projects are well thought through and help a lot with understanding and learning. Finally, about the examples used in this course, many of them are simple and nice, but some of them are maybe too simple to convey the message, such that it doesn't help much with understanding... | much more interesting. Also the quizzes, | Exercise | and projects are well thought through | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Exercises should be more tough so that students can read a lot on the web about different thingsthey could do with Javascript. Hands-on experience should be given to be more interactive. | | Exercise | should be more tough so that | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | I found this very interesting and easily adaptable to the Visible Thinking exercises I currently use with the 9th and 10th grade English classes. Thank you for your insights. | easily adaptable to the Visible Thinking | Exercise | I currently use with the 9th | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | Actually, this course is a great one to take. Professors have explained these concepts and main ideas very clearly, therefore students can understand it very easily, even if they do not have previous knowledge about game theory. I want to say “thank you” to all the three professors for making such a concise and intelligible course. However, I would like to give some suggestions about this course. There is an obvious gap between the quizzes and graded assignments. Sometimes the quiz is very easy and it just requires you to have a basic understanding of the concept, while the assignment is even more difficult than the examples included in the videos. I think this course would be better if the staff can improve the difficulty gap between quizzes and assignments. And for people who want to enroll this course, an exercise book with detailed solution would be helpful for you to learn it better. As for the content of this course, there are lots of formulas from Week 5 to the end, which are a little difficult to understand. I fully understand this because math is always abstract, and formulation is an essential part of it. I think this problem can be solved by providing more ungraded quizzes for students to practice. They can have a better comprehension of the content through practicing. Anyway, this course is worth taking. Through learning it you will gain not only the knowledge about game theory, but also a new way to understand relationships around you. Happy learning! | want to enroll this course, an | Exercise | book with detailed solution would be | Negative | 0.77 | 4.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | A perfect introduction to game theory, especially the exercises make you think about the subject. | introduction to game theory, especially the | Exercise | make you think about the subject. | Positive | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | Really interesting course but I have some recomendations: 1)I've missed that the professors would have done more example exercises on every lesson 2)The value of the certificate to others (ie to find a job) is how hard is to pass the course or the minimum knowledge that the student adquires. The evaluation system makes it very easy to cheat (with 3 attemps every 8 hours for the practice sets or the exam). With test-type answers it is very easy to pass the course even if you haven't watched any lesson video or learnt anything. 3) For point 2 I recommend that the check system on practice sets and the exam could be able to accept numeric or simbolic answers (not test-type) so that it will have infinite answers and nobody could cheat the system (in Edx I've done some courses that have this system). Another option could be that every attempt that you make substracted 10% on the calification of that practice set, so if you've already done the practice set twice you could only get 70% tops on the third attempt. Thanks to the staff! | professors would have done more example | Exercise | on every lesson 2)The value of | Negative | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | In my opinion, it gets too technical and it is not a self contained course at all. Neither it is a beginner course for game theory. If someone is looking to understand the real basics of it, should take the Univeristy of Tokyo course. Some lessons were really abstract and I ended up looking for information in other websites to understand it. Another thing... I suppose the three lecturers are incredible good in their respective fields, but in the teaching part, Some Shoham's lessons were like listening to a robot. M. O Jackson is pretty clear in his explanations altough too technical, and Leyton Brown has a very clear way to teach, but I honestly got lost many times in the final exercises. | lost many times in the final | Exercise | | Positive | 0.73 | 3.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | I guess that more exercise solving process should be should in lectures. All the rest is great! | I guess that more | Exercise | solving process should be should in | Negative | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| Hr9lByyfEeWccAqzeA4VPw | My overall experience with this Specialization, in general, and this 1st Course, in particular, is very positive. On the positive side, I really like the fact that the Courses are practice-oriented and provide not only theoretical frameworks, but also insights from experts, practical guidance, and evidence-based best practices. Also, the idea of applying Team-Based Learning (TBL), in the forms of Readiness Assurance Tests (RATs) and scenario-based RAT Application Exercises, for assessing participants' learning, is excellent! However, there are a couple of downsides, that's why I'm not giving a 5 star positive feedback. The first problem is that not all of the required readings are freely available via the Coursera platform, or elsewhere online. I appreciate the excellent quality of the chosen materials, but, if it becomes compulsory to spend more than US $100 for buying books, then the total cost of this Specialization elevates quite a lot, given that I had to pay €162 for it. On my opinion, there should be at least a note in the description of both the Specialization and the Courses about these requirements, in order to make an informed decision before enrolling. The second downside has to do with Course 1 and Course 2 overlapping materials. I'm referring to guest interview videos. That's mainly a problem of the 2nd Course, as there are almost no guest interviews in this Course, and the one interview provided is already available in Course 1. I understand that the topics discussed apply to the topics of both Courses, but, still, I find it an unnecessary repetition. The last problem is about the dates that the Courses are run. Course 1 runs during a given period, Course 2 is on demand, but it makes sense to attend it before Course 3, that also runs during a given period, which overlaps with the period of the 1st Course. Sorry, this makes it very difficult to attend everything and to seriously focus, as it's always about running for deadlines, especially when one has to produce three (3) Board Effectiveness Assessment Reflection (BEAR) papers :( . | Tests (RATs) and scenario-based RAT Application | Exercise | for assessing participants' learning, is excellent! | Positive | 0.97 | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I took this class to fulfill a prerequisite for my graduate program, and it was outstanding -- easily the best online class I have taken to date. The professor is enthusiastic and explain things very well. Not only is the material broken into manageable chunks, but the supporting exercises and textbooks are really helpful too. I highly recommend it. | into manageable chunks, but the supporting | Exercise | and textbooks are really helpful too. | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | An excellent course. Has a focus on underlying concepts and intuitions. Could be hard to follow without recent exposure to math. I recommend doing Khan Academy videos and exercise prior to taking this course or in parallel. | recommend doing Khan Academy videos and | Exercise | prior to taking this course or | Positive | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The best Calculus course I have seen. It has lots of real world examples to introduce the concepts, and there is a great balance between intuition and mathematical rigour. The exercises are also timed perfectly to help understanding the concept. | between intuition and mathematical rigour. The | Exercise | are also timed perfectly to help | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Its a very good course. The teacher teachs with love and attention. I just think could have more exercises in video to help to do on the assignments. I recommend!!!! | I just think could have more | Exercise | in video to help to do | Negative | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | easy to follow, good examples and practice exercises. | to follow, good examples and practice | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very well taught, but I think the exercises were disjointed and did not always fit with what was being taught. Other than that, great course! | well taught, but I think the | Exercise | were disjointed and did not always | Negative | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | very clear. It should be more exercise | very clear. It should be more | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This is an excellent course with the best kind of instructor! The explanation is pellucid. The examples and exercises are very practical. Thank you Jim for such a masterpiece of online education! | explanation is pellucid. The examples and | Exercise | are very practical. Thank you Jim | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This course is brilliant. The lectures are full of information, but they're also funny, engaging and always enjoyable. And there are loads of them (25 hrs?), so this feels like quite a thorough introduction to calculus. Some of the exercises are pretty tough for a newcomer like me, but the answers are always thoroughly explained. The lack of a hard time limit is very welcome because it gives you time to take in new ideas at your own pace, without rushing you through assignments or tests. What's more, it's all free. Hats off! | introduction to calculus. Some of the | Exercise | are pretty tough for a newcomer | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The teacher is Excellent. The materials used in teaching are very good. I liked the use of colors, the explanations in very details, and not skipping calculations. I liked the explanation behind everything, on how this is used in real life. I liked the enthusiasm of the teacher. He likes what he is doing and he loves Math. I think the limits subject should be taught in more details. I would liked it more if every theorem would have a proof. I think the use of epsilon/delta in practice was too little in this course, and should be expanded (it looks like this is a course for engineers rather than for mathematicians). The most painful problem in this course are the exercises, in 2 aspects. The first aspect: in many cases the exercises repeat themselves in a slightly different form - the diversity of of exercises should be expanded. The second aspect: exercises which require my typing have a lot of parsing issues, which are not clear, and are frustrating: example from integrals: the system would expect an answer like this one: (x)*(E^x) - E^x+C and would not accept a correct answer like this x*E^x - E^x+c. In this sense, I recommend using questions with multiple answers, and leave the open answers only for the cases where you need to type something where there are no parsing issues expected, such as typing numeric values. Thank you for this course. I liked it. | problem in this course are the | Exercise | in 2 aspects. The first aspect: | Negative | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The teacher is Excellent. The materials used in teaching are very good. I liked the use of colors, the explanations in very details, and not skipping calculations. I liked the explanation behind everything, on how this is used in real life. I liked the enthusiasm of the teacher. He likes what he is doing and he loves Math. I think the limits subject should be taught in more details. I would liked it more if every theorem would have a proof. I think the use of epsilon/delta in practice was too little in this course, and should be expanded (it looks like this is a course for engineers rather than for mathematicians). The most painful problem in this course are the exercises, in 2 aspects. The first aspect: in many cases the exercises repeat themselves in a slightly different form - the diversity of of exercises should be expanded. The second aspect: exercises which require my typing have a lot of parsing issues, which are not clear, and are frustrating: example from integrals: the system would expect an answer like this one: (x)*(E^x) - E^x+C and would not accept a correct answer like this x*E^x - E^x+c. In this sense, I recommend using questions with multiple answers, and leave the open answers only for the cases where you need to type something where there are no parsing issues expected, such as typing numeric values. Thank you for this course. I liked it. | first aspect: in many cases the | Exercise | repeat themselves in a slightly different | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The teacher is Excellent. The materials used in teaching are very good. I liked the use of colors, the explanations in very details, and not skipping calculations. I liked the explanation behind everything, on how this is used in real life. I liked the enthusiasm of the teacher. He likes what he is doing and he loves Math. I think the limits subject should be taught in more details. I would liked it more if every theorem would have a proof. I think the use of epsilon/delta in practice was too little in this course, and should be expanded (it looks like this is a course for engineers rather than for mathematicians). The most painful problem in this course are the exercises, in 2 aspects. The first aspect: in many cases the exercises repeat themselves in a slightly different form - the diversity of of exercises should be expanded. The second aspect: exercises which require my typing have a lot of parsing issues, which are not clear, and are frustrating: example from integrals: the system would expect an answer like this one: (x)*(E^x) - E^x+C and would not accept a correct answer like this x*E^x - E^x+c. In this sense, I recommend using questions with multiple answers, and leave the open answers only for the cases where you need to type something where there are no parsing issues expected, such as typing numeric values. Thank you for this course. I liked it. | form - the diversity of of | Exercise | should be expanded. The second aspect: | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The teacher is Excellent. The materials used in teaching are very good. I liked the use of colors, the explanations in very details, and not skipping calculations. I liked the explanation behind everything, on how this is used in real life. I liked the enthusiasm of the teacher. He likes what he is doing and he loves Math. I think the limits subject should be taught in more details. I would liked it more if every theorem would have a proof. I think the use of epsilon/delta in practice was too little in this course, and should be expanded (it looks like this is a course for engineers rather than for mathematicians). The most painful problem in this course are the exercises, in 2 aspects. The first aspect: in many cases the exercises repeat themselves in a slightly different form - the diversity of of exercises should be expanded. The second aspect: exercises which require my typing have a lot of parsing issues, which are not clear, and are frustrating: example from integrals: the system would expect an answer like this one: (x)*(E^x) - E^x+C and would not accept a correct answer like this x*E^x - E^x+c. In this sense, I recommend using questions with multiple answers, and leave the open answers only for the cases where you need to type something where there are no parsing issues expected, such as typing numeric values. Thank you for this course. I liked it. | should be expanded. The second aspect: | Exercise | which require my typing have a | Negative | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The material is very well explained and the exercises at the end of each lesson are helpful for solidifying the understanding of each concept. | is very well explained and the | Exercise | at the end of each lesson | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great course. Nice lectures, well organized and challenging exercises. | Nice lectures, well organized and challenging | Exercise | | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This course is simply AWESOME. Prof. Fowler's explanations are great, but probably you know it won't do its job unless you really dedicate some effort on your own. Calculus is a pretty complex and intimidating subject but not an impossible one. Do as many exercises as you can. Play with it and keep your enthusiasm like Prof. Fowler. Understanding will be your reward. | an impossible one. Do as many | Exercise | as you can. Play with it | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The explanations are direct, simple and exact! The exercises are the reflection of the classes! The teacher is espectacular! Congrats to the team! | are direct, simple and exact! The | Exercise | are the reflection of the classes! | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I recommend you this course. This course is very nice. Lectures are very easy to understand even if you are first time of calculus. But I think the questions are too little to exercise enough. Anyway thanks for the instructor. He's very nice and passionate guy. | the questions are too little to | Exercise | enough. Anyway thanks for the instructor. | Negative | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I came here curious about the chain rule (in connection with computing gradients for neural networks back-propagation) and to brush up calculus so I could help my high schooler kid. I ended up relearning lots of old skills as well as some techniques that I didn't remember (or didn't learn well enough back in high school). Prof Fowler is very engaging and a great teacher. I found his attempts to prove the same idea from multiple viewpoints very interesting. The self-paced setup of the course is also quite helpful, and the mandatory exercises at the end of each section help to reinforce the material. So great course and a great implementation! | also quite helpful, and the mandatory | Exercise | at the end of each section | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The course is really good, because the teacher is great, but there are some errors in subtitles, and even in some exercises. | in subtitles, and even in some | Exercise | | Positive | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | There is some good material in this course. The text is fairly good. But I have two main reservations about the course. The first is that the lectures do not always correspond closely enough with the quizzes, and with the text. There are times when one can take a quiz and think, "How exactly does this relate to the lectures I just saw?" The text has quite a few exercises, but there is a tendency to throw in one or two problems whose difficulty is an order of magnitude above everything else in that section, and I find this discouraging and a waste of time. Save those for a later course, or put them into a separate "Extra Challenges" section. Learning calculus is hard enough without trying to grapple without some really tricky trig problem at the same time. as a single example. The second reservation is with the instructor's manner. Many students find it very enjoyable. I am not one of them. Much of the time, he's OK, especially when the camera is not pointed at him. But as the course progresses, much of the footage is of him at his desk, and the closeups become more and more extreme, the hand-waving and fist-clenching approach sheer windmilling, and the exaggerated eye-rolling, grinning and so forth become so distracting that I can't bear to watch. I realize that the goal was to avoid being a dry-as-dust droning professor, and that is commendable, but there is a happy middle ground between that and hamming. I can almost speculate that there was an impulse to add in cartoon sproing-bonk-cuckoo-klaxon sound effects. (There is actually one such sound effect, but just one, so I won't quibble on that.) I would have found the class more effective with a demeanor that was enthusiastic without being histrionic. I'm sure this is one of those "you either love it or hate it" things, and I may be in the minority. The instructor is not generally one to throw out some concept that has not already been learned and then just motor on without explanation. He errs on the side of overly-detailed explanation, which to me is preferable to skipping over subjects or techniques and assuming you know them. Having said all of this, I repeat that there is good material, and you can learn the fundamentals of calculus for free in this course. | The text has quite a few | Exercise | but there is a tendency to | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | It is a complete course, with visualization and with silent demonstrations accompanying explanations. I like very much the videos and the exercises. | very much the videos and the | Exercise | | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | When it comes down to it, there's simply not the support to assist a student that has a really hard problem, "hacker mentality" seems to equate to "figure it out on your own cuz nobody's going to help you". If things do not work perfectly for you then you are likely never to be able to finish because your "peers" don't know any better either. The way this class is set up makes me angry every time I have to deal with it. I would probably be just as well served doing just the swirl() exercises. I would quit if I hadn't paid all the way through in advance. I can't believe this is the type of school John Hopkins is to produce a course of this quality, but I guess I have to. | well served doing just the swirl() | Exercise | I would quit if I hadn't | Negative | 0.95 | 1.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | The course is quite good and informative in the first two weeks covering a lot of information and a lot of exercises. Week 3 is very unrelated and hard the videos and exercises are bad, and I had to do this part by myself again. Also when we get to the final course project doesn't cover any of these techniques. In my opinion, week 3 should be replaced with something more related to plotting systems and distributions, also one project would be enough. | of information and a lot of | Exercise | Week 3 is very unrelated and | Positive | 0.78 | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | The course is quite good and informative in the first two weeks covering a lot of information and a lot of exercises. Week 3 is very unrelated and hard the videos and exercises are bad, and I had to do this part by myself again. Also when we get to the final course project doesn't cover any of these techniques. In my opinion, week 3 should be replaced with something more related to plotting systems and distributions, also one project would be enough. | unrelated and hard the videos and | Exercise | are bad, and I had to | Negative | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good course, but the SWIRL exercises (and a few quiz questions) needed to be updated for the latest version of ggplot2. | Good course, but the SWIRL | Exercise | (and a few quiz questions) needed | Negative | 0.63 | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | This was an excellent course full of useful exercises, assignments and lectures. I took these classes for the data analysis | an excellent course full of useful | Exercise | assignments and lectures. I took these | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | If you know some R programming and want to learn how to generate plots for your data analysis, this course will give you a good start. I highly suggest doing swirl exercises after watching the lecture videos to reinforce your understanding of the course materials. | start. I highly suggest doing swirl | Exercise | after watching the lecture videos to | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| HXsj6jeHEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A very interesting course outlining the important of good revenue management and flexible pricing to maximize hotel revenue and profits. I would welcome a few more practical exercises DURING the course and not only on the final quiz. Also, it would be good to have the tables and presentations on .pdf or . jpg format as details are not readable behind the presenter. Looking forward to the next course in this specialization, namely Demand Management. | would welcome a few more practical | Exercise | DURING the course and not only | Positive | 0.66 | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Perfect for beginning and intermediate graphic designers. The explanations of concepts and exercises are quite useful and makes the foundations of graphic design clear and accessible. Highly recommended. | designers. The explanations of concepts and | Exercise | are quite useful and makes the | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very great basic but detailed concepts for graphic design. Easily understand. The exercise made me think through the whole idea of graphic design. | for graphic design. Easily understand. The | Exercise | made me think through the whole | Negative | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very rewarding, with easy to understand but comprehensive lectures and optional exercises that can be done with each sub-section of the lecture. These exercises were interesting, relevant and challenging. It was also educational to do the peer reviews and see how other students approached the assignments. The instructions for assignments perhaps could be broken into bullet points, as sometimes they were perhaps not fully understood on the optional exercises. Some guidelines to help give more substantial or constructive feedback (beyond "This met the assignment criteria" or "I liked #3") could be helpful. I'm very glad I did this course, and I was thoroughly engrossed in the exercises. It was sad when the course ended. :-) | understand but comprehensive lectures and optional | Exercise | that can be done with each | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very rewarding, with easy to understand but comprehensive lectures and optional exercises that can be done with each sub-section of the lecture. These exercises were interesting, relevant and challenging. It was also educational to do the peer reviews and see how other students approached the assignments. The instructions for assignments perhaps could be broken into bullet points, as sometimes they were perhaps not fully understood on the optional exercises. Some guidelines to help give more substantial or constructive feedback (beyond "This met the assignment criteria" or "I liked #3") could be helpful. I'm very glad I did this course, and I was thoroughly engrossed in the exercises. It was sad when the course ended. :-) | each sub-section of the lecture. These | Exercise | were interesting, relevant and challenging. It | Negative | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very rewarding, with easy to understand but comprehensive lectures and optional exercises that can be done with each sub-section of the lecture. These exercises were interesting, relevant and challenging. It was also educational to do the peer reviews and see how other students approached the assignments. The instructions for assignments perhaps could be broken into bullet points, as sometimes they were perhaps not fully understood on the optional exercises. Some guidelines to help give more substantial or constructive feedback (beyond "This met the assignment criteria" or "I liked #3") could be helpful. I'm very glad I did this course, and I was thoroughly engrossed in the exercises. It was sad when the course ended. :-) | not fully understood on the optional | Exercise | Some guidelines to help give more | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very rewarding, with easy to understand but comprehensive lectures and optional exercises that can be done with each sub-section of the lecture. These exercises were interesting, relevant and challenging. It was also educational to do the peer reviews and see how other students approached the assignments. The instructions for assignments perhaps could be broken into bullet points, as sometimes they were perhaps not fully understood on the optional exercises. Some guidelines to help give more substantial or constructive feedback (beyond "This met the assignment criteria" or "I liked #3") could be helpful. I'm very glad I did this course, and I was thoroughly engrossed in the exercises. It was sad when the course ended. :-) | I was thoroughly engrossed in the | Exercise | It was sad when the course | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good visual material accompanied by excellent written supplement that allowed us to follow the recorded portion of the course. Interesting exercises and great methodology that allow students to review and provide feedback to others. | recorded portion of the course. Interesting | Exercise | and great methodology that allow students | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It comes with a lot of exercises which made me learn concepts that I've trying to learn only by reading. | It comes with a lot of | Exercise | which made me learn concepts that | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Thank You so mutch. I loved to learn more about graphic design and the exercises was really helpfull. Keep Going, guys. We need you. | more about graphic design and the | Exercise | was really helpfull. Keep Going, guys. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course. Make sure you plan time to do all of the optional exercises, they are great. | to do all of the optional | Exercise | they are great. | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course with good exercises. A fantastic starting place on your journey to graphic design. Will force you to become familiar with industry standards like Indesign, Photoshop and Illustrator to complete some assignments, which I think it a good thing. The lectures are also enjoyable and well presented. | Great course with good | Exercise | A fantastic starting place on your | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I enjoyed the combination of hands on creative exercises and quizzes. I will forever remember " You learn to be a designer by designing" | the combination of hands on creative | Exercise | and quizzes. I will forever remember | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This was a great introductory course. I appreciated how much the lectures were chunked down--to make it easier to move through the information each week and that there was a good mixture of required and optional exercises. I had fun! I also liked that this course did not require software such as Indesign, Illustrator, or Photoshop. | good mixture of required and optional | Exercise | I had fun! I also liked | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | A very complete course with many applied exercises. I recommend it. | very complete course with many applied | Exercise | I recommend it. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This had some really good fundamentals and some really helpful exercises. I recommend this to anyone who would like to understand a little more about Graphic Design. | good fundamentals and some really helpful | Exercise | I recommend this to anyone who | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I like the exercises they are very useful! | I like the | Exercise | they are very useful! | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good and educational contents. Great practical exercises that help develop knowledge. | good and educational contents. Great practical | Exercise | that help develop knowledge. | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I've enjoyed this course so much! I nearly quit it before properly starting, because the first video seemed very uninteresting. Also, the material covered seemed very basic and common sense. And I guess a lot of it is, but to discuss these basic concepts, and experiment with them is very valuable. It also made me very excited about designing. In this course, it's up to the student to decide how much they want to put into the course, and therefore how much they will get out of it. Lots of the assignments are optional. However, all (but one) exercise really helped me explore the concepts explained. It's a clear course. It's a very basic course. Get ready to get hands on. | are optional. However, all (but one) | Exercise | really helped me explore the concepts | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great introduction course. I wish there were links to relevant literature on the topics. Some exercise formulations are not instantly clear. | relevant literature on the topics. Some | Exercise | formulations are not instantly clear. | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This was my first attempt at a MOOC, and I think I'm spoiled. This is the just right format and just right medium for learning these skills. The class demonstration videos are simple enough to really demonstrate the concepts. The exercises are also well formulated to help get the concepts across effectively in this medium. | to really demonstrate the concepts. The | Exercise | are also well formulated to help | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course. Interesting and fun lectures, useful exercises. Awakes creativity in you. Thanks a lot for this course! | course. Interesting and fun lectures, useful | Exercise | Awakes creativity in you. Thanks a | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course with a great range of introductory information with a good selection of exercises to complete. I learnt a lot from this course and had fun doing the assignments. | information with a good selection of | Exercise | to complete. I learnt a lot | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I really enjoyed the classes and the explanations were clear, precise and professional. thank you very much for preparing this classes. The exercises and references were very useful. | much for preparing this classes. The | Exercise | and references were very useful. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Learnt a lot more about the design process so far in the week two of the course. Experimentation is constantly encourage during the classes and course exercise, i believe its an essential process every designer should embrace to communicate ideas effectively. | encourage during the classes and course | Exercise | i believe its an essential process | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| IfDtq1vFEeSKTyIAC0YL2w | I was a very very useful course, specially the heatmap plot generation and R language lab exercises was great! | plot generation and R language lab | Exercise | was great! | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The course is very good, but would like to make three suggestions: 1) You don't have a feedback from what you made wrong in the exercises. It is usefull to learn from the mistakes. 2) One week is a short lead time for the tasks 3)It might include extra optional tasks regarding simulation | what you made wrong in the | Exercise | It is usefull to learn from | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | I thank the organizers for this well-structured Chemistry course. I was sometimes overwhelmed by the amount of information given but I guess this is due to the condensation process that had to be carried out in order to impart the contents in 11 weeks. Otherwise I would have appreciated to have more exercises resolved during the lessons and to get a sheet with all the formula used during the course...Thank you again. | would have appreciated to have more | Exercise | resolved during the lessons and to | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course is delivered in a simple manner, easy to follow and with clear instructions. I'm not sure how much a peer review is a valuable contribution once most of the students don't really know how to criticize properly the peer's assignment, either always giving the full mark or evaluating according to its personal ideas and not necessary what the exercises called for. Anyway, it's still a very valuable alternative to formal education, specially if the student is committed enough. | ideas and not necessary what the | Exercise | called for. Anyway, it's still a | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Very practical, great exercise, easy to understand and follow through, the student doesn’t need major computer programs or high quality technology in order to complete each assignment. The design of each assignment is made to use your imaginations, hands on tools and materials. Love the videos, clear, to the point beautiful made. Lots of room to work and do something quite good and unique if the student want! I am really having fun! Thank you! | Very practical, great | Exercise | easy to understand and follow through, | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good for public education with general nutrition knowledge integrated with environmental protection, practical behaviors and cooking exercises. | environmental protection, practical behaviors and cooking | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Great Course...Advise it for new people in project management world. Exercises could be better (putting scenarios or simulators...etc) | new people in project management world. | Exercise | could be better (putting scenarios or | Negative | 0.77 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The course is a little bit hard to follow for the people who are just starting in the Project Management Area. It would be nice to have more video lessons and less additional material to consult. I liked the weekly exercises. | to consult. I liked the weekly | Exercise | | Positive | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Presenter was easy to listen to and having the additional exercises helped understand the material. | listen to and having the additional | Exercise | helped understand the material. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good as overview, but pretty shallow. Only some slides to read through, no real exercises but constant reference to the standard project management book. Pretty fast click-through as start into project management. | slides to read through, no real | Exercise | but constant reference to the standard | Negative | 0.91 | 2.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Gained very good understanding of how to register and connect an IoT device / gateway to Watson IoT Platform. Use Watson IoT APIs, Python APIs, Node.js APIs to send, receive and process events / commands and learnt how to use a Node-RED UI Flows to handle IoT requests from Raspberry Pi & Sense HAT devices. The hands-on labs and exercises inspired me to try out other examples / ideas to further extend my IoT knowledge boundaries. Thank you! | HAT devices. The hands-on labs and | Exercise | inspired me to try out other | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Extremely helpful. It was detailed and at the same time brief, made sure I am able to connect with the content and learn in ways that will be useful in career. Also, the exams and exercises made sure that my concepts are deep rooted into me. Great Course. | in career. Also, the exams and | Exercise | made sure that my concepts are | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good as just an introduction to data science. Some more exercises using Github, maybe some collaborative works would have been nice. | introduction to data science. Some more | Exercise | using Github, maybe some collaborative works | Positive | 0.76 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I enjoyed the course - I wish there were more exercises, but hopefully they'll come in the next courses of this specialization. | - I wish there were more | Exercise | but hopefully they'll come in the | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview, I appreciated that the course gets you set up and makes you prove it. More command line and RStudio simple exercises would be nice. | More command line and RStudio simple | Exercise | would be nice. | Positive | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Too basic content. I have not learned anything with this course (installing R and RStudio should not be part of exercises or lectures). I hope R programming course will be better | RStudio should not be part of | Exercise | or lectures). I hope R programming | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | TL;DR -- Good videos but short and not always relevant material; the course should be titled "A First Light Introduction to Strategy Implementation" The "Strategy Implementation" course is rather a first introduction to the concepts. The material is quite short: only 30 minutes of videos every week and no interviews with "real-life" managers. The additional articles to read most relate to blue-chip companies that succeeded: Samsung, Toyota, Netflix, Google, and of course the obligatory Apple mentioned in every Strategy course on the planet. However, it would be much more interesting to discuss failures and/or duller companies. Finally, the final peer-review exercise is a bit broken but that is the case of every MOOC peer-graded approach (cf. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/hack-higher-education/problems-peer-grading-coursera to know more). On the upside, videos are well edited and clear and easy to understand. | duller companies. Finally, the final peer-review | Exercise | is a bit broken but that | Positive | 0.94 | 2.0 |
| j7Dwn9djEeWlbgqNCYymGw | Great explanation and exercises. They really know the difficulties of ESL students. I truly loved this course and recommend. | Great explanation and | Exercise | They really know the difficulties of | Negative | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| JBCvTm03EeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Course was clear and the exercises were very important to make us reflect and improve our mindset. | Course was clear and the | Exercise | were very important to make us | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good material with more than enough detailing on the subject. Wish it could have more practical examples and exercises. | could have more practical examples and | Exercise | | Negative | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| jFTD2Tu2EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good explanations, and the exercises and power points prepared helped to understanding it better. Thanks! | Very good explanations, and the | Exercise | and power points prepared helped to | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Great class with lots of wonderful information! I just wish the homeworks were less of a tedious exercise of controller tuning and more about implementing theory. Other than that, great course! | homeworks were less of a tedious | Exercise | of controller tuning and more about | Negative | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very well designed course. Enough material is covered and the exercises are very well designed and meaningful. It's a rewarding experience. It worths every minute you spend on it. | Enough material is covered and the | Exercise | are very well designed and meaningful. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | the course is a good topic, but the exercises are mainly teaching you how to write a PD control and tune the PD parameters. | is a good topic, but the | Exercise | are mainly teaching you how to | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course successfully covers the mechanics and control topics of quadrotors. The course also points to some resources in order to extend your study on UAVs. However, there are some issues concerning the assignments which I didn't like at all: 1. Big gap in difficulty between assignments of first three weeks compared with the assignment of the fourth week. 2. The difficulty of the assignments of the first three weeks just relied on sweeping (somewhat 'smartly') a 1,2,3, or 6 dimensional parametric space. I guess that real UAVs engineers are not paid for this. In some assignment, I had to edited a file which I was not supposed to edit in order to pass it. 3. The last assignment was quite frustrating for the following reasons 3a. Really long running times to test if the parameters work fine. I would sacrifice the fancy real-time visualization to save some time. Apart from long running times, I guess that UAVs are not solving ODEs in real time on board, so I think is more interesting a more practical/real-time approach. 3b. Search in a 12-dimensional parametric space (some parameters are equal, but still you end up tunning 5,6 independent parameters, which influence each other). Come on, is this useful? I am sure that UAVs engineers don't spend their hours in this kind of crappy search. You could explain at least some existing heuristics when having so many control parameters to tune. 3c. Even though the drone trajectory seems to fit perfectly the planned trajectory, you might not pass the exercise, and you would get some clueless messages telling you the final position/velocity is not correct. 3d. The assignment guide is very unclear in some parts. 3e. A lot of typos in the formulas of the last part of the guide. I decided to completely ignore it and develop my own strategy, which turned out to be far simpler and easier to implement. 3f. The submission program tests the whole exercise regardless you passed some sections or not, which make the waiting times even longer. | trajectory, you might not pass the | Exercise | and you would get some clueless | Negative | 0.85 | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course successfully covers the mechanics and control topics of quadrotors. The course also points to some resources in order to extend your study on UAVs. However, there are some issues concerning the assignments which I didn't like at all: 1. Big gap in difficulty between assignments of first three weeks compared with the assignment of the fourth week. 2. The difficulty of the assignments of the first three weeks just relied on sweeping (somewhat 'smartly') a 1,2,3, or 6 dimensional parametric space. I guess that real UAVs engineers are not paid for this. In some assignment, I had to edited a file which I was not supposed to edit in order to pass it. 3. The last assignment was quite frustrating for the following reasons 3a. Really long running times to test if the parameters work fine. I would sacrifice the fancy real-time visualization to save some time. Apart from long running times, I guess that UAVs are not solving ODEs in real time on board, so I think is more interesting a more practical/real-time approach. 3b. Search in a 12-dimensional parametric space (some parameters are equal, but still you end up tunning 5,6 independent parameters, which influence each other). Come on, is this useful? I am sure that UAVs engineers don't spend their hours in this kind of crappy search. You could explain at least some existing heuristics when having so many control parameters to tune. 3c. Even though the drone trajectory seems to fit perfectly the planned trajectory, you might not pass the exercise, and you would get some clueless messages telling you the final position/velocity is not correct. 3d. The assignment guide is very unclear in some parts. 3e. A lot of typos in the formulas of the last part of the guide. I decided to completely ignore it and develop my own strategy, which turned out to be far simpler and easier to implement. 3f. The submission program tests the whole exercise regardless you passed some sections or not, which make the waiting times even longer. | The submission program tests the whole | Exercise | regardless you passed some sections or | Negative | 0.73 | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course definitely requires prerequisite knowledge of calculus and matrix math. There is also very little in the way of practical application. The MatLab work is interesting but barely explained. The assignments were nearly impossible without help from other students. Understanding which equations that were shown in the lecture (not necessarily explained) were useful in completing the assignments was not apparent and there was no help from the TAs. I don't think the assignments were irrelevant but without having a background in academic engineering the course needs to walk through similar exercises with explanations to increase understanding and ability to complete the course. While I don't think this course was well presented and I can't say I truly learned anything I am glad I was exposed to the material and I will continue with the Specialization. | course needs to walk through similar | Exercise | with explanations to increase understanding and | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I think this course does not a good job of explaining the mathematics very well. The supplementary material is very good in that regard, compared to the lectures. However, there are too few to make up for it. I would need a few example calculations of similar problems to what we are expected to solve in the exercises. As a result, my learning success is not very satisfactory. | are expected to solve in the | Exercise | As a result, my learning success | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A good lecture material. All is presented step by step and clearly. I would like more exercise on the calculation of the rotation matrix on the transformation and displacement of objects. Thanks Professor Vijay Kumar and support team. | and clearly. I would like more | Exercise | on the calculation of the rotation | Negative | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| jIaMzuYjEeWomRIq0eOZbw | The course basically teaches fundamental programming for handling fmri images in R. It's more or less comprehensive. It would have been more objective to assess learning if graded hands-on exercises were given. Then again, it may not be easy for the course design. Thank you very much! | to assess learning if graded hands-on | Exercise | were given. Then again, it may | Negative | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| jlAy87ZEEeWddwqLXioIgw | The applications were too time consuming. Please consider adding a tool that makes graphing easier. The course itself was very good and engaging and without us knowing it, would teach core fundamentals of computing through the coding exercises. | fundamentals of computing through the coding | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Makes you think. Interesting for any developer or anyone intested in narratives as a whole. Really nice exercises and lists too! | narratives as a whole. Really nice | Exercise | and lists too! | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The course develops skills in communicating video game narratives and weaving these into the overall structure of the game. The strategy hinges on a series of outlines--taught with examples and exercises--that eventually fit together in a comprehensive design document, which allows a designer/writer to organize ideas and make them comprehensible and engaging for potential readers. The examples used are great, covering games both simple and complex; and the exercises grow gradually less structured, ensuring that the skills necessary to develop an idea from scratch are gained along the way. | both simple and complex; and the | Exercise | grow gradually less structured, ensuring that | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The course topic are well explain and easy to understand, the videos are well directed, and the creative exercises are pretty cool. | are well directed, and the creative | Exercise | are pretty cool. | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I was pretty upset by finding out there will be no Fran at this course, but Dariush is an amazing teacher too! I love how the material presents and exercises and examples are very interesting! 5 stars, no doubts! | love how the material presents and | Exercise | and examples are very interesting! 5 | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| kcW15H3JEeWKYwric11Hpw | Great content. Need more exercises, and solution to homeworks (eventually). | Great content. Need more | Exercise | and solution to homeworks (eventually). | Positive | 0.91 | 4.0 |
| KK4EhXQMEeSc3CIACrbZqg | Great class. Broad explanations of the project finance process, step by step and full of real world examples plus practical exercises. I would love to be able to take a specialization from SDA Bocconi on these topics. | of real world examples plus practical | Exercise | I would love to be able | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | this is very basic and clear about social. it helps me understand about the fielf of social marketing, some concepts, such as social network, virtual community and characteristics of these are essential for making social plan. the exercise seems easy but practical, it is good first step for leaning social marketing. hope to learn next course | essential for making social plan. the | Exercise | seems easy but practical, it is | Positive | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| KuL4QMbGEeWQSAqHNmfP4Q | This specialization has been nothing short of awesome. This exam really caps it off on a high note. Not only the quizzes were challenging and interesting, they are also very relevant to all the concepts learnt throughout the specialization. The exam consists of a good mix of conceptual, algorithmic, debugging, optimization problems, graph modelling and mathematical computation problems. The very tight time frame of only a few weeks with only 1 single attempt each week forced me to be very careful with my solutions and double check my work carefully before submitting. The only thing that I wish to see is that this exam should be 2 exams instead of just 1 exam. I sort of still hunger for more challenging exercises like this exam. I really hope that this capstone exam course sets a good example for other Coursera courses because challenging mini-exams like this are incredibly valuable tools to validate our knowledge. | of still hunger for more challenging | Exercise | like this exam. I really hope | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| KzTkolCEEeWxCwowHhzTpQ | Very informative and interesting. I find that the exercises did not contribute enough to understanding the material. | and interesting. I find that the | Exercise | did not contribute enough to understanding | Negative | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course met my expectations. The exercises were relevant to the discussions and the level of depth made it easy to follow. A fine course to introduce oneself to HTML, CSS, and Javascript basics. | The course met my expectations. The | Exercise | were relevant to the discussions and | Positive | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course had a good content and the exercises were able to make the use of the elements | had a good content and the | Exercise | were able to make the use | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is very interesting for junior -wannabe- web programmers. It uses the main structures of HTML and JavaScript and lets the user exercise through questions and assignments. Best option if someone wants to be a web developer! | and JavaScript and lets the user | Exercise | through questions and assignments. Best option | Positive | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Fantastic Course. I feel confident with the exercises and information provided! | Course. I feel confident with the | Exercise | and information provided! | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The videos and presentation are fine. The exercises are quite easy and the main problem of the course is that they are review for other students withput any teacher assuring that is right. | videos and presentation are fine. The | Exercise | are quite easy and the main | Positive | 0.79 | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good course on HTML5/CSS/JavaScript. Enough resources and practices exercises. | on HTML5/CSS/JavaScript. Enough resources and practices | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good intro class. The exercises were really helpful. | Very good intro class. The | Exercise | were really helpful. | Positive | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is a good course. Just need more hands on training to practice exercises | more hands on training to practice | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is good, although the last exercise of the series is a bit too challenging if you want people that have just started with javascript to pass. Also, sometimes it focuses too much on theory and high level examples that don't build up into practical uses of javascript. | course is good, although the last | Exercise | of the series is a bit | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course! Very well thought out and introduced step by step. I'm on the third course in the series. This lays a great foundation. The assignments are great at taking previous exercise code and tailoring to new forms. It take a little extra effort and research, but will make you a better programmer. | assignments are great at taking previous | Exercise | code and tailoring to new forms. | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | great course exercise helps a lot | great course | Exercise | helps a lot | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I enjoyed this course. The materials are presented in an easily understandable manner. The exercises are fun and good for learning. | in an easily understandable manner. The | Exercise | are fun and good for learning. | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I have prior programming experience and have done a few courses on coursera. I found the course useful to gain a fair degree of proficiency in html,css & javascript. The course is not easy and needs a lot of work. The exercises are also thoughtfully designed to make you apply your skills. I did not upgrade and did the exercises myself without the benefit of a peer review | needs a lot of work. The | Exercise | are also thoughtfully designed to make | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I have prior programming experience and have done a few courses on coursera. I found the course useful to gain a fair degree of proficiency in html,css & javascript. The course is not easy and needs a lot of work. The exercises are also thoughtfully designed to make you apply your skills. I did not upgrade and did the exercises myself without the benefit of a peer review | did not upgrade and did the | Exercise | myself without the benefit of a | Negative | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is a good introduction to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The lectures were straightforward, and the assignments were good exercises of the lecture material. I gave it 4 stars, only because the task of learning HTML and CSS is a bit dry and boring. No fault of the instructor. | straightforward, and the assignments were good | Exercise | of the lecture material. I gave | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course, very well made. The exercises and assignments were helpful as well. | Excellent course, very well made. The | Exercise | and assignments were helpful as well. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good, but would be better with more examples and exercises of more key aspects. | be better with more examples and | Exercise | of more key aspects. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well done. Focuses mainly on videos to teach the content with an assignment at the end of the week that uses everything you learned. I would rate 5 stars if it had more quizzes or exercises to do before the week's assignment. At any rate you learn a lot about Html, css, and JS and it's a worthy class in this specialization. | if it had more quizzes or | Exercise | to do before the week's assignment. | Negative | 0.85 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | If you want to be a web developer and have no knowledge of html and css then you can start from this for sure, the basics are cleared in a very good way and the exercises are hard enough to ue your brain for the exercises. | a very good way and the | Exercise | are hard enough to ue your | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | If you want to be a web developer and have no knowledge of html and css then you can start from this for sure, the basics are cleared in a very good way and the exercises are hard enough to ue your brain for the exercises. | to ue your brain for the | Exercise | | Negative | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good exercises | Very good | Exercise | | Positive | 0.81 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very thorough, and the learning exercises definitely force you to use what you've learned properly. | Very thorough, and the learning | Exercise | definitely force you to use what | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a pretty good course for learning basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. I already had some experience with these three languages, so consider that when reading this review. I found that the amount of information they cram into this three week course was pretty substantial, which I think is a positive aspect of the course. They don't just teach you what you need to complete the exercises, they teach you a lot of things that even more experienced users of this language may have forgotten. That being said, I don't think the amount of information covered is realistically anyone could retain in three weeks. I would instead see this course as a crash course as to what features are available with these three languages, then save the course slides as sort of a reference for when you go off on your own. My favorite part of this course is that the exercises are unique and fun. The HTML assignment is sort of boring, but that's because HTML is boring, but the exercises that use javascript are a lot of fun. To conclude, I think this course would be great for brand new web developers and also for people who just need a refresher. Good luck! | what you need to complete the | Exercise | they teach you a lot of | Negative | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a pretty good course for learning basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. I already had some experience with these three languages, so consider that when reading this review. I found that the amount of information they cram into this three week course was pretty substantial, which I think is a positive aspect of the course. They don't just teach you what you need to complete the exercises, they teach you a lot of things that even more experienced users of this language may have forgotten. That being said, I don't think the amount of information covered is realistically anyone could retain in three weeks. I would instead see this course as a crash course as to what features are available with these three languages, then save the course slides as sort of a reference for when you go off on your own. My favorite part of this course is that the exercises are unique and fun. The HTML assignment is sort of boring, but that's because HTML is boring, but the exercises that use javascript are a lot of fun. To conclude, I think this course would be great for brand new web developers and also for people who just need a refresher. Good luck! | of this course is that the | Exercise | are unique and fun. The HTML | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a pretty good course for learning basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. I already had some experience with these three languages, so consider that when reading this review. I found that the amount of information they cram into this three week course was pretty substantial, which I think is a positive aspect of the course. They don't just teach you what you need to complete the exercises, they teach you a lot of things that even more experienced users of this language may have forgotten. That being said, I don't think the amount of information covered is realistically anyone could retain in three weeks. I would instead see this course as a crash course as to what features are available with these three languages, then save the course slides as sort of a reference for when you go off on your own. My favorite part of this course is that the exercises are unique and fun. The HTML assignment is sort of boring, but that's because HTML is boring, but the exercises that use javascript are a lot of fun. To conclude, I think this course would be great for brand new web developers and also for people who just need a refresher. Good luck! | because HTML is boring, but the | Exercise | that use javascript are a lot | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Its ok and I liked the exercises, but I think you see to many themes and there is almost no practice for them. Its hard to learn them. | Its ok and I liked the | Exercise | but I think you see to | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent material, Knowledgeable trainer, Nice short quiz and exercises, hands-on assignments with clues and study materials. Last but not the least, reviewing others assignments and learning from others. Really enjoyed learning HTML, CSS and JavaScript. | Knowledgeable trainer, Nice short quiz and | Exercise | hands-on assignments with clues and study | Negative | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great introduction course covering the basic building blocks of modern web applications. The lectures are easy to follow, with plenty hands-on exercises. | easy to follow, with plenty hands-on | Exercise | | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course covered a lot of ground in only 3 weeks. It gave me the knowledge and confidence to create a JavaScript solution to a website problem shortly after I finished it. It is structured logically, with well-planned exercises that reinforce learning. | It is structured logically, with well-planned | Exercise | that reinforce learning. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well-designed courses, good exercises. | Well-designed courses, good | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A lot of information, easy to understand, good quality of lectures and interesting practical exercises! Thanks! | quality of lectures and interesting practical | Exercise | Thanks! | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | need more engagement and exercises before every week task | need more engagement and | Exercise | before every week task | Positive | 0.82 | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | These exercises are not difficult, even a little easy. | These | Exercise | are not difficult, even a little | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course but it would have been better to include some simple exercises to help with learning the javascript | been better to include some simple | Exercise | to help with learning the javascript | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Exercises could have been tougher so that we could reinforce learning material and also try to learn how to search the web to find the solution to a bug. Before a month, all I knew was Javascript was tough.Thanks for making me feel confident programming in Javascript. Thank You. | | Exercise | could have been tougher so that | Negative | 0.93 | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course flow goes smoothly. Exercises are good. In starting I felt reviewing classmate assignment task boring, but later on realized it is very helpful and we can get idea of different logic and thinking process. Overall good experience. | Course flow goes smoothly. | Exercise | are good. In starting I felt | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | At first I thought this course was going to be rather simplistic but it was anything but that. I loved the exercises we had to do. I really got into them and it was the first time I felt inspired to try my hand at writing poetry. The teaching was great--he has a great future ahead of him in entertainment I would say! | anything but that. I loved the | Exercise | we had to do. I really | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Absolutely wonderful course. Simple and well explained videos, nice instructor, great suggestions from the other students and fun exercises to get better and better in writing your own poems. Highly suggested. | from the other students and fun | Exercise | to get better and better in | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | fun and informative class, with interesting exercises, instructor grabs your attention in short videos. | fun and informative class, with interesting | Exercise | instructor grabs your attention in short | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | In short presentations, Doug manages to give insightful tools to crafting a fine-tuned poem. He makes learning about rhyme, metaphor and scansion uncomplicated while he hones your focus, so your writing can surprise you. The class exercises and community feedback help create a classroom of learners. I was inspired. For the first time I understood iambic pentameter, trochees and scansion. The best tool was learning how to revise, how to look for the turn in the poem and expand that turn into something unforeseen. | writing can surprise you. The class | Exercise | and community feedback help create a | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | I had a lot of troubles with the spark exercises process. bad for the specialization. | lot of troubles with the spark | Exercise | process. bad for the specialization. | Negative | 0.77 | 4.0 |
| LWzwe3KxEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | interesting and exercises helped to understand those topics more | interesting and | Exercise | helped to understand those topics more | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | The course is clear and goes at a sustained but correct pace. I really like the fact to show the weakness to understand what are the requirements of a secure PRF, PRP & co! Optional programming assignments are really interesting unfortunately they take too much time to do and lack of guidance as it could be the case for the famous ML course. At least the first exercises should provide a development environment to get familiar with: hex, crypto libs, dictionary research, stats algorithms implementation ... The first two weeks lack of in-video tests. | ML course. At least the first | Exercise | should provide a development environment to | Negative | 0.9 | 3.0 |
| m0Du-7_DEeWn-wqIckNy5Q | I don't know about the graded homework, but the videos are good and clear, and the exercises are very usefull. I still have to practice by my own, though. | are good and clear, and the | Exercise | are very usefull. I still have | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Instructor speaks too slow and sometimes hardly audible with my earphones plugged in with 100% sound. Incredibly slow paced. Coffee must!!! Too much of story and history and introduction. Much less material presented for concepts shown. Much of the lecture time is wasted on things which does not matter, for example Djikstra shortest path... I would be more interested to know about the algorithm than a huge lecture on who is Djikstra, and also would like to have some exercise to implement the same and realise. Very unsatisfied with the course. But there is no other courses offered for C++ programming language in English Language. Not worth the time. | also would like to have some | Exercise | to implement the same and realise. | Negative | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| maX993EhEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | This course has amazing breath. Most other specializations are organized chronologically (i.e. Course 1: Learn Ruby, Course 2: learn about databases with rails, Course 3: Learn about HTML,CSS, JS, etc.) But this introductory course describes everything that goes into making web applications, from front end to back end and compares ruby on rails to the other major frameworks. If you're just trying to get started learning WebApps, as I was, this is very useful. The reason I couldn't give it 5 stars was that there weren't very useful assignments. You learn programming best from doing projects. In this course, there were a few quizes (which aren't as nearly as useful as projects) and the only projects that existed were to simply follow the steps exactly as the professor did in his videos. I think that the makers of the course are 90% of the way to a top course, they just need to add in programming assignments for each week, where you don't just follow the professor. I learned a lot from this course, but without getting the programming projects and exercises needed to reinforce the understanding, it may be hard to retain some of the knowledge. | without getting the programming projects and | Exercise | needed to reinforce the understanding, it | Positive | 0.88 | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | A very good course, i liked very much the examples used, i do wish there where some practical exercises. | do wish there where some practical | Exercise | | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | I think it's a great tester course with very good Blocks of code, and these blocks of code are not seen until week 4 and 5. Week 3 was a hands on km to miles, and miles to km app, good hands on. I explored the course, so I'd not do any of the exercises, but did the final assignment from what I suggested I will create in week two. I created a great app, but wasn't able to share it, so i'll put it on github. | I'd not do any of the | Exercise | but did the final assignment from | Negative | 0.97 | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I think with more listen exercises this course will be better and the length of the videos too short. | I think with more listen | Exercise | this course will be better and | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Course is a little disorganized, and sounds are a little difficult to hear sometimes (in the exercises where you're asked to distinguished sounds, but I guess that's the point of those exercises. I don't quite understand the self-study videos because they're already in the main lesson videos, but otherwise, this is a wonderful course. I mean, I already speak a tonal language so the tones are easy for me, but they shouldn't be too difficult for non-tonal speakers too. Otherwise, this course gets you through the basics pretty quickly without too much emphasis on vocabulary or grammar and without Chinese characters; if you're keen, you'll pick up the grammar as you go along. On a more technical note, the videos could be of better resolution, but that's not going to impede the course progression or anything. Kudos to this course's contributors! | difficult to hear sometimes (in the | Exercise | where you're asked to distinguished sounds, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Course is a little disorganized, and sounds are a little difficult to hear sometimes (in the exercises where you're asked to distinguished sounds, but I guess that's the point of those exercises. I don't quite understand the self-study videos because they're already in the main lesson videos, but otherwise, this is a wonderful course. I mean, I already speak a tonal language so the tones are easy for me, but they shouldn't be too difficult for non-tonal speakers too. Otherwise, this course gets you through the basics pretty quickly without too much emphasis on vocabulary or grammar and without Chinese characters; if you're keen, you'll pick up the grammar as you go along. On a more technical note, the videos could be of better resolution, but that's not going to impede the course progression or anything. Kudos to this course's contributors! | guess that's the point of those | Exercise | I don't quite understand the self-study | Negative | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | The course is paced well for those who have little to no exposure to spoken Mandarin. The exercises are engaging. | no exposure to spoken Mandarin. The | Exercise | are engaging. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I absolutely loved the course, it was tough at the beginning but the teacher gives you examples and makes observations on the pronounciations and repeatedly reminds you how to pronounce the words. So that really helps your ear to open to the different sounds and vowels, and you get better with every assignment. Also the extra exercises helps you to get a better understanding of the Chinese culture, weather, food, etc. | with every assignment. Also the extra | Exercise | helps you to get a better | Positive | 0.62 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This course is definitely helpful for those who has not learned Chinese before as well as who has learned a bit Chinese. The exercises are well prepared and help learners to review all the lessons logically. | has learned a bit Chinese. The | Exercise | are well prepared and help learners | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good course for beginners. In my opinion, its strong point is simplicity (it does not require much effort and yet allows you to learn something useful, and also makes you think that Chinese is not unbearably complex language after all) and broad range of topics (probably gives you all words necessary to survive short trip to China). What I didn't like in this course is lack of explanation: student is required to memorize entire sentences, but nothing was said about word ordering, personal pronouns and other basic structural features of language. I would also like to have more tests/ exercises with feedback, probably some review tests covering previous lessons. | also like to have more tests/ | Exercise | with feedback, probably some review tests | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Videos proceed way too fast for complete beginners and things are explained without enough underlying basics. Plus there is not really enough chance for repetitions in the videos. Tonal explanations are good, except for the green line where you are not told how to choose what part of that tone to pronounce every time. Overall, it could be a great course but falls short because the videos proceed way too fast and without enough repetitions or even practice exercises to be able to remember the phrases afterwards. | without enough repetitions or even practice | Exercise | to be able to remember the | Negative | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This course is enjoyable and easy to learn from. A minor drawback is that some pictures are difficult to distinguish in the exercises. | are difficult to distinguish in the | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | The whole course is basically a short topic based phrasebook being read-out and over-explained in English. Since I already speak English, this isn't very useful. The course contains no dialogues, or any real situations where vocab's being reviewed. I found the exercise nitpicky and confusing, and there's no indication nor review of what actually you did wrong. Better just use an audio-phrasebook and repeat it using the same time. | vocab's being reviewed. I found the | Exercise | nitpicky and confusing, and there's no | Negative | 0.99 | 2.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Really excellent guided course. Well explained and very useful exercises. Highly recommend | course. Well explained and very useful | Exercise | Highly recommend | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I love everything about this course. the course material is easy to follow. I also like the coding exercises. I highly recommend the specialisation so far (this is my second course) | follow. I also like the coding | Exercise | I highly recommend the specialisation so | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course start from problems. So this great to motivate the content and let student know why. However, there are lot of confusion questions that lead to miss understand the exercise problems. | that lead to miss understand the | Exercise | problems. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course is very well organized and all the information is relevant. Everything is explained in great detail. The exercises really make you feel that you are learning. | is explained in great detail. The | Exercise | really make you feel that you | Positive | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A bit to easy to get through the exercises but otherwise very enlightening and inspirering. | to easy to get through the | Exercise | but otherwise very enlightening and inspirering. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Fantastic course. Lot of courses I have taken do not give the mathematical formulation. This course provides a detailed understanding of the math behind ML. Also in the programming exercises one implements the algorithms from scratch and also use the existing libraries. | behind ML. Also in the programming | Exercise | one implements the algorithms from scratch | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Since Regression is so very abstract - for some reason - the exercises could have used much more insight or an approach that stepped you through similar to the Classification course. | - for some reason - the | Exercise | could have used much more insight | Negative | 0.94 | 3.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | These Machine Learning classes have been fantastic so far, really enjoying them. Very good coverage of topics and challenging exercises to drive home the learning. The effort put into developing the classes has been superb and I look forward to the rest of the specialization. | good coverage of topics and challenging | Exercise | to drive home the learning. The | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent. This is an ideal course in order to understand various aspects of regression techniques. Explanation using hands-on exercises helps me learn this course very effectively. I must appreciate the efforts of both Instructors (Prof. Emily & Prof. Carlos). | of regression techniques. Explanation using hands-on | Exercise | helps me learn this course very | Positive | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great course! Good balance of theory and practical application. I'm glad that we didn't use GraphLab as much as in the first course and more exercises were implementing the algorithms. My one recommendation for improvement would be to revise some of the assignments with an eye for making the instructions more clear. There were a few--particularly week 5--where I understood the concepts, but it was very unclear what exactly we were being asked to do. Looking forward to the next course! | in the first course and more | Exercise | were implementing the algorithms. My one | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course is great! I had a lot of fun going through the exercises and concepts they show are really relevant. I am not sure about the level of the whole series, as it probably is more towards beginner than intermediate, but it's great to get some practice with Python and learn / brush-up / deepen knowledge in ML. I am really looking forward to the next class - that's probably the area I would like this series to improve, the gaps between courses are just too long. Overall great work! Thanks! | lot of fun going through the | Exercise | and concepts they show are really | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | great course, I learned a lot. Videos, slides, quiz, programming exercises, a lot of fun. | a lot. Videos, slides, quiz, programming | Exercise | a lot of fun. | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course touches on basic concepts quite nicely and should help students with adequate math background to gain a good understanding of regression on both high and low level. A text book and optional exercises could help attain better theoretical ground for regression. In general, references and suggested reading are missing from this specialization. I would also like to see optional programming assignments on publicly available data sets other than the repeatedly used house prices data. | level. A text book and optional | Exercise | could help attain better theoretical ground | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A very good course! Especially that scikit-learn can be used as framework for solving assignments and at the same time exercises for programming of learning algorithms from scratch. Thanks! | assignments and at the same time | Exercise | for programming of learning algorithms from | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This was much more in-depth than the intro course in the sequence, which was exactly what I was hoping for. I still think that it could stand to be more challenging. Perhaps the instructors might offer some optional, more challenging exercises. Or, maybe students could choose an alternate "challenge version" of the homework that contains fewer hints. | might offer some optional, more challenging | Exercise | Or, maybe students could choose an | Negative | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This gives a nice survey of the techniques and approaches of Linear Regression. Lectures are structured well, and mathematical derivations are provided as optional lectures. Each week has a quiz that goes over the material, as well as programming assignments that are meant to provide a higher level understanding via Dato's GraphLab Create, as well as lower level understanding with Numpy. I am dropping a star because some portions of the programming exercises seemed to be contrived. | because some portions of the programming | Exercise | seemed to be contrived. | Negative | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course! Teachers are perfect and knowledge is overall, but the exercise need some improvement. | and knowledge is overall, but the | Exercise | need some improvement. | Negative | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great lessons that helps me to think more about how people influence people and how to exercise one of the most useful,practical tatics to inluence!Thank you! | people influence people and how to | Exercise | one of the most useful, practical | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Excellent way of teaching interactively. Very good exercise problems to revise and learn by practice. Occasional use of humor also adds interest to the course. | way of teaching interactively. Very good | Exercise | problems to revise and learn by | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Best python (or programming) course for beginners I have seen (and I tried a lot of them). 1) Codesculptor helps a lot (no need for endless saving, running IDLE etc) - you go immediatelly 2) Interesting examples + exercises with templates (where you just fill in some part of code) maintain motivation and interest high. No basic boring stuff like "print fibonacci sequence". Also - more focused on actual programming than on mathematical/logical solving of exercises (as I viewed in some courses) 3) Small enough increments to not being overwhelmed, yet still motivated by new stuff. To sum it up, I am looking forward to subsequent courses in this series. | go immediatelly 2) Interesting examples + | Exercise | with templates (where you just fill | Negative | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Best python (or programming) course for beginners I have seen (and I tried a lot of them). 1) Codesculptor helps a lot (no need for endless saving, running IDLE etc) - you go immediatelly 2) Interesting examples + exercises with templates (where you just fill in some part of code) maintain motivation and interest high. No basic boring stuff like "print fibonacci sequence". Also - more focused on actual programming than on mathematical/logical solving of exercises (as I viewed in some courses) 3) Small enough increments to not being overwhelmed, yet still motivated by new stuff. To sum it up, I am looking forward to subsequent courses in this series. | programming than on mathematical/logical solving of | Exercise | (as I viewed in some courses) | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Overall is good course with many exercises, forum is supportive, however mentors/instructors never answered my questions (i guessed they bothered only with the very first session when course was launched) Language is sometimes overly complicated and hard to grasp the main principles of the algorithm (e.g. dynamic programming week 5) I watched youtube to understand same ideas but explained in much simpler way. | Overall is good course with many | Exercise | forum is supportive, however mentors/instructors never | Positive | 0.94 | 3.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | I like the course structure and material. It starts off easy enough to get you interested and then throws at you challenges at early stage, if you are up for it. What I don't like is video session itself, some of instructors talk too fast and dwell much into topic, assuming you understood everything. And as way to composite that, they offer a "resource" links to help you understand. Then some of them have "hard" accent, it's really difficult to follow them even for native speaker, yet alone for those whose English is second language. Now exercise and assignments are spot on but you are forced to relay on other sources to grasp everything. I doubt anyone taking this course has not reached for "outer" help at least once. | whose English is second language. Now | Exercise | and assignments are spot on but | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Overall this was a good course. Some of the presenters need to work on their presentation skills (personally I had no problems with the accents). I also felt that the sections on dynamic programming seemed a bit rushed and I needed to spend a bit of time researching this on third parties before I felt comfortable completing the exercises. The grading system was really cool and the exercises seemed well thought-out and thorough. I'd recommend this course to existing developers without a computer science background. Those who want more mathematical rigour should look into the Tim Roughgarden/Stanford course. | before I felt comfortable completing the | Exercise | The grading system was really cool | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Overall this was a good course. Some of the presenters need to work on their presentation skills (personally I had no problems with the accents). I also felt that the sections on dynamic programming seemed a bit rushed and I needed to spend a bit of time researching this on third parties before I felt comfortable completing the exercises. The grading system was really cool and the exercises seemed well thought-out and thorough. I'd recommend this course to existing developers without a computer science background. Those who want more mathematical rigour should look into the Tim Roughgarden/Stanford course. | system was really cool and the | Exercise | seemed well thought-out and thorough. I'd | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Great to lay out the basis of algorithms. Very descriptive and progressive. I enjoyed all the exercises that helped understanding and implementing all the concepts explained in this course. It is also worth mentioning that, towards the end, they offer more advanced algorithms to challenge your newly acquired knowledge. | and progressive. I enjoyed all the | Exercise | that helped understanding and implementing all | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Excellent coverage of algorithmic techniques in this course, with very accessible introductions to such fundamental topics as the Master Method, greedy algorithm design, and dynamic programming. This class hits the sweet spot for people who find Tim Roughgarden's Analysis and Design of Algorithms course too intense and hand-wavy, but who still want mathematically-sound, proof-based discussion of algorithmic techniques. (Listen to Roughgarden's drive-by treatment of Karatsuba's algorithm in his first week of lectures, and you will appreciate Neil Rhodes' coverage of the same algorithm all the more.) You get an introduction to a lot of "greatest hits" from Computer Science, but at a level where you come away understanding the technique. The problem sets start off with fairly easy exercises, just enough to reinforce your understanding, and progress up to exercises that will prove challenging indeed to newcomers. You will get a lot out of careful study of this course. I look forward to continuing in this specialization. | sets start off with fairly easy | Exercise | just enough to reinforce your understanding, | Negative | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Excellent coverage of algorithmic techniques in this course, with very accessible introductions to such fundamental topics as the Master Method, greedy algorithm design, and dynamic programming. This class hits the sweet spot for people who find Tim Roughgarden's Analysis and Design of Algorithms course too intense and hand-wavy, but who still want mathematically-sound, proof-based discussion of algorithmic techniques. (Listen to Roughgarden's drive-by treatment of Karatsuba's algorithm in his first week of lectures, and you will appreciate Neil Rhodes' coverage of the same algorithm all the more.) You get an introduction to a lot of "greatest hits" from Computer Science, but at a level where you come away understanding the technique. The problem sets start off with fairly easy exercises, just enough to reinforce your understanding, and progress up to exercises that will prove challenging indeed to newcomers. You will get a lot out of careful study of this course. I look forward to continuing in this specialization. | your understanding, and progress up to | Exercise | that will prove challenging indeed to | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Videos are very well explained, the exercises comes with several difficulties, good to apply what you learn and push a bit more. I was able to retake some stuff that I've forgotten and learn new stuff. As a 12 year experienced engineer, I'm please that I took this course. | Videos are very well explained, the | Exercise | comes with several difficulties, good to | Positive | 0.97 | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Excellent course with tons of exercises and interesting lectures. | Excellent course with tons of | Exercise | and interesting lectures. | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | This is a fantastic course about the basics of Investment Management. While it is an introductory course, it does not shy away from some basic maths and includes some very interesting and instructive spreadsheet exercises. The quality of the presentations, subtitles and slides is outstanding. The quizzes are challenging but always within the content of the lectures. I strongly recommend this course to anybody interested in investment management who is not afraid of some basic maths. Moreover, I strongly encourage the team, that organised this MOOC, to create more specialized and in depth courses, maybe even a Specialization. | some very interesting and instructive spreadsheet | Exercise | The quality of the presentations, subtitles | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is insightful and intuitive. The professors have done a great job. If you are already a programmer in some other language, you might find some topics a bit primitive but the project that is at the end of the module should be a good exercise even for the experienced programmers. And, to recreate the entire project on your own would be a great exercise. It will also gear you up nicely for the next course in the specialization. | the module should be a good | Exercise | even for the experienced programmers. And, | Negative | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is insightful and intuitive. The professors have done a great job. If you are already a programmer in some other language, you might find some topics a bit primitive but the project that is at the end of the module should be a good exercise even for the experienced programmers. And, to recreate the entire project on your own would be a great exercise. It will also gear you up nicely for the next course in the specialization. | your own would be a great | Exercise | It will also gear you up | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Sometimes the person who is speaking it doesnt inderstand very well Some exercises it doesnt understand very well theyll asume you yave more experience that they wanted for this course. I think it would be if they give more examples and exercise for the assigments regards | it doesnt inderstand very well Some | Exercise | it doesnt understand very well theyll | Positive | 0.87 | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Sometimes the person who is speaking it doesnt inderstand very well Some exercises it doesnt understand very well theyll asume you yave more experience that they wanted for this course. I think it would be if they give more examples and exercise for the assigments regards | if they give more examples and | Exercise | for the assigments regards | Negative | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course. The exercises have found it very good. I have learned a lot | Great course. The | Exercise | have found it very good. I | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good practical overview of Java language with good exercises that emphasize the course contents. | overview of Java language with good | Exercise | that emphasize the course contents. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | While the material is relevant, the exercises required too much specific knowledge that was not discussed in lecture. For an experienced programmer, most of the exercises were easy, but I admit I had to look ahead on two of the projects because the instructions were too lacking. The final project was too open ended and made me not want to finish this course. Overall, I would not recommend this course. | While the material is relevant, the | Exercise | required too much specific knowledge that | Negative | 0.85 | 2.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | While the material is relevant, the exercises required too much specific knowledge that was not discussed in lecture. For an experienced programmer, most of the exercises were easy, but I admit I had to look ahead on two of the projects because the instructions were too lacking. The final project was too open ended and made me not want to finish this course. Overall, I would not recommend this course. | an experienced programmer, most of the | Exercise | were easy, but I admit I | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great contents as the rest of the courses in the specialization. I'm afraid I need to be a little bit critical with this one though: 1) The contents are really jammed into 4 weeks - The last week's contents are actually some kind of miscellany between mongoose, https, authentication and BaaS 2) Not a single quiz or self-evaluation of sorts along the course - To be completely fair, the exercises shown along the way might make up for it. Still, I think it's important to spread some quizes around so as to make absorb the concepts more effectively 3) The quality of the presentations is somewhat lower than other courses. There's even a video towards the end of the course where a Linkedin notification springs up on top, which even makes the presenter pause for a few seconds. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this course and definitely appreciate the effort put into it - Given the newly introduced Coursera fees, I'd expect much more quality in place to make it 70 buck-worth, though | - To be completely fair, the | Exercise | shown along the way might make | Negative | 0.66 | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent teaching. First of all, i thank Dr.k.Muppalla for such wonderful teaching with good exercises. this course will help all those who want to learn about web services. | for such wonderful teaching with good | Exercise | this course will help all those | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good teacher. More coding exercises would improve the course. | Very good teacher. More coding | Exercise | would improve the course. | Positive | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a great teacher!! I ve tried several times to learn html, this was the only one that I found fun and useful and with material that make sense and exercises that help you learn. | with material that make sense and | Exercise | that help you learn. | Negative | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is the best course for a complete beginner. The presentation of the course material is very friendly, the instructor was really great and the quizzes were perfect. The only thing I would like to suggest is adding more coding exercises. But as it stands now, it is still fantastic! I see some people have complained about the final project auto-grader of this course. But you should know that the final project now has additional quizzes (related to the project) and even though the auto-grader sometimes makes mistakes, you can compensate that by answering the project quizzes correctly. If you are a beginner in web development, "Introduction to HTML5" is the best start you can possibly have. Most importantly this course will give you the confidence to take more advanced courses in future. | to suggest is adding more coding | Exercise | But as it stands now, it | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I think It's too little amount of material. It is very shame, that there aren't any exercise after each week. | very shame, that there aren't any | Exercise | after each week. | Negative | 0.77 | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good introduction in general. However, more practical exercises are required. | introduction in general. However, more practical | Exercise | are required. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Would have liked an exercise between lessons. Would have liked clearer instructions for final assignment. | Would have liked an | Exercise | between lessons. Would have liked clearer | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The professor is excellent: she is very clear, relaxed, and dedicated to her subject. The book is great! I enjoyed working through the exercises and the final project. | great! I enjoyed working through the | Exercise | and the final project. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A brief but interesting introduction to HTML. Very few practical examples and exercises, but it does cover the basics like: syntax, semantics, what to pay attention to while creating own website. Love the way the material is presented by Mrs. Lent and will finish all three remaining courses. Combined with the HTML & CSS course at CODECADEMY I have the ability to write simple html, read somebody else's code and find resources necessary to get me started with my own page. Till now I always thought HTML and web design was boring, well not anymore! I would recommend this course to somebody who is only starting to learn HTML. | HTML. Very few practical examples and | Exercise | but it does cover the basics | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I would like that the course propose more practical exercises. | that the course propose more practical | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I was expecting more coding exercises and the major task was only the demo page which I completed and validated, but somehow I always failed that answer wrong in the final quiz | I was expecting more coding | Exercise | and the major task was only | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | More hands-on practice, more exercises like the one on Week #2 where we(the students) follow the professor's step by step instruction into coding, and not so much lecture (though lecture its understandable as we need to learn all these definitions and what we are actually doing). | More hands-on practice, more | Exercise | like the one on Week #2 | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I like the course, but I'd like to have deeper information about HTML5 and more exercises for learning and practicing. Also, there's few info about hosting and managing your website. Hope i'll find it in sooner courses of this university. | deeper information about HTML5 and more | Exercise | for learning and practicing. Also, there's | Positive | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | The course covers the basic foundations of behavioral finance, especially prospect theory and various cognitive biases that negatively influence our decision making in financial affairs. The topics covered are definitely very interesting and the lecturers frequently prove that they know what they are talking about and explain some topics in adequate depth and breadth. For a valuable Coursera course I am expecting that most of the material is covered with video lectures (otherwise I read a book on that matter) and I am expecting thought-through slides with clear definitions, clear practical examples and exercises, and the presentation of experimental proofs for the given statements. Regrettably, most of this course is comprised of simple slides with limited structuring, as definitions, exercises, and proofs are often intermingled. More importantly, only a very limited subset of the course is covered with the suitable and valuable video lectures. Especially the last of the three-week course consist mostly of reading material from an external website. The exercises after each of the three weeks are at the lower end of what I have seen on Coursera and the lecturers should consider putting more effort in creating useful questions for formative and summative evaluations of the learning progress. In summary, smart lecturers present a very interesting and highly relevant topic, but they put to little effort in creating a compellingly online course. | clear definitions, clear practical examples and | Exercise | and the presentation of experimental proofs | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | The course covers the basic foundations of behavioral finance, especially prospect theory and various cognitive biases that negatively influence our decision making in financial affairs. The topics covered are definitely very interesting and the lecturers frequently prove that they know what they are talking about and explain some topics in adequate depth and breadth. For a valuable Coursera course I am expecting that most of the material is covered with video lectures (otherwise I read a book on that matter) and I am expecting thought-through slides with clear definitions, clear practical examples and exercises, and the presentation of experimental proofs for the given statements. Regrettably, most of this course is comprised of simple slides with limited structuring, as definitions, exercises, and proofs are often intermingled. More importantly, only a very limited subset of the course is covered with the suitable and valuable video lectures. Especially the last of the three-week course consist mostly of reading material from an external website. The exercises after each of the three weeks are at the lower end of what I have seen on Coursera and the lecturers should consider putting more effort in creating useful questions for formative and summative evaluations of the learning progress. In summary, smart lecturers present a very interesting and highly relevant topic, but they put to little effort in creating a compellingly online course. | slides with limited structuring, as definitions, | Exercise | and proofs are often intermingled. More | Positive | 0.66 | 2.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | The course covers the basic foundations of behavioral finance, especially prospect theory and various cognitive biases that negatively influence our decision making in financial affairs. The topics covered are definitely very interesting and the lecturers frequently prove that they know what they are talking about and explain some topics in adequate depth and breadth. For a valuable Coursera course I am expecting that most of the material is covered with video lectures (otherwise I read a book on that matter) and I am expecting thought-through slides with clear definitions, clear practical examples and exercises, and the presentation of experimental proofs for the given statements. Regrettably, most of this course is comprised of simple slides with limited structuring, as definitions, exercises, and proofs are often intermingled. More importantly, only a very limited subset of the course is covered with the suitable and valuable video lectures. Especially the last of the three-week course consist mostly of reading material from an external website. The exercises after each of the three weeks are at the lower end of what I have seen on Coursera and the lecturers should consider putting more effort in creating useful questions for formative and summative evaluations of the learning progress. In summary, smart lecturers present a very interesting and highly relevant topic, but they put to little effort in creating a compellingly online course. | material from an external website. The | Exercise | after each of the three weeks | Positive | 0.93 | 2.0 |
| NtRu6kfmEeWk9g4dP2hYVQ | Good course for beginners, provides basic information about Open MP and MPI usage as well as some useful practical exercises. Also includes profiling/optimization session with Intel C/C++ compiler with good step-by-step instructions. | as well as some useful practical | Exercise | Also includes profiling/optimization session with Intel | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | I can't say I really enjoyed this 5 week course. The flow itself was more like "food for thought" where a bunch of ideas are presented as sort of an intellectual gymnastics exercise with no point really. By week 5 you are just plain bored. The content wasn't concise enough. It could have easily been a 4 week course or even shorter had they not tried to belabor each topic. It all was too high level and never really got down enough to earth. I have done other courses on the same topic which were better put together. | as sort of an intellectual gymnastics | Exercise | with no point really. By week | Negative | 0.91 | 2.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | The course teaches a lot of core concepts of distributed systems (clouds included). The content is well delivered and the homework reflects the material very well. The homework is appropriately tough. There is an optional programming assignment for setting up a distributed network of nodes with failure detection. I learned a lot about gossip based information spreading while doing the exercise. That said, the assignment is not clearly explained and it is hard to get started. Overall I did enjoy the course and learned a great deal. | based information spreading while doing the | Exercise | That said, the assignment is not | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Great course, highly effective with the built-in exercises!! Thank you So much! | course, highly effective with the built-in | Exercise | ! Thank you So much! | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | It appeared to be a very good course for me. Not only the content is good (may be for some students it will seem quite obvious - not for me, actually), but the tutor itself is kind of role model of a person who is good at public speaking. I think even just watching the videos without doing any exercises will increase the watchers' public speaking skills. | watching the videos without doing any | Exercise | will increase the watchers' public speaking | Negative | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Just love the way this subject is taken on: practical and clear. From the start it takes away the preconception that good speakers are just born. This course states: good speeches are just the result of good, careful preparation, and there are ways to learn how to do exactly that. I never thought it would be possible to learn to speak in public like this, but it is. There are lots of examples analyzed to the core elements, and exercises to be uploaded as videos for peer assignments. Great to get feedback, and to be able to refine and record again the same speech with its help. Perfect also that you can follow it on your own on demand, and advance according to your own schedule. And of course, it is a pleasure to see the main teacher speaking! | analyzed to the core elements, and | Exercise | to be uploaded as videos for | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Excellent course, good exercises and great teacher. | Excellent course, good | Exercise | and great teacher. | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| oSDxwswyEeWXgg4wnpJx-w | It's a quiet complex topic in general terms. It is well covered, but In my opinion there should be at least an exercise per video, explaining something similar to the in-video questions. It should have a demonstrative part rather than just talking about it and showing the formula. | there should be at least an | Exercise | per video, explaining something similar to | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Didn't really elevate my writing. Mostly due to the fact that there were no practical exercises included. Though some of the theoretical stuff that is covered is sort of common sense, most is still very relevant, so I don't regret taking the course. | fact that there were no practical | Exercise | included. Though some of the theoretical | Negative | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Felt that it could have more writing exercises. | that it could have more writing | Exercise | | Negative | 0.92 | 3.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I learned a lot with this course, but there are not so many exercises for students to train the content learned. The lectures are very good. | but there are not so many | Exercise | for students to train the content | Negative | 0.69 | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Informative and easy to understand, even though the course could have benefit more if we actually get a few peer-review exercises regarding the type of writing we learned from the course. Overall, good for beginner. | we actually get a few peer-review | Exercise | regarding the type of writing we | Negative | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Great course, but needed more exercises for student practice. | Great course, but needed more | Exercise | for student practice. | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | it's to general. I would like to have done some exercises. Great framework without a punchline. | would like to have done some | Exercise | Great framework without a punchline. | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The modules had a lot of aspects and covered each one in detail. However, it would have been helpful to have some hands-on exercises like writing an executive summary, evaluating a resume, writing an elevator pitch etc so that people learn from each other. Otherwise, its a great course with emphasis on different aspects of business writing. Thanks | been helpful to have some hands-on | Exercise | like writing an executive summary, evaluating | Negative | 0.89 | 3.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Resources Professor provides are very helpful and well-explained. Each presentation slide is clear and easy to understand. Overall, I am very satisfied with the course. I wish Professor included more exercises for us to write and have a peer review. | course. I wish Professor included more | Exercise | for us to write and have | Negative | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Very helpful tips for preparing a professional business document. Hoping the course could have more focused exercises to make sure learners actually master the skills. | the course could have more focused | Exercise | to make sure learners actually master | Negative | 0.84 | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course!!! By the end I felt like I really have solid grasp on low level programming and the basic programming concepts. Interesting exercises involving parsing through a text file that makes use of all these techniques. Extremely practical! Can't recommend this course enough. Definitely take it! | and the basic programming concepts. Interesting | Exercise | involving parsing through a text file | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course. Good exercises, good coverage of everything. Great for beginners. | Great course. Good | Exercise | good coverage of everything. Great for | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Truly enjoyed the course and Dr Severance's talks. However, I believe that more assignments would help me feel more confortable about "mastering" a topic before moving on to the next one. Even if the course does not have more exercises, pointing towards where they can be found would be highly useful. | the course does not have more | Exercise | pointing towards where they can be | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Professor is great, and the course gives a thorough introduction to python data structures and isn't too hard to get. The only reason that I would give 4 stars is because the assignments and exercises. Each chapter you only get 1 or 2 codes to write, which can be easily adapted from the codes showed online. I'm hoping for variety of coding exercises to better understand the concepts. Since coding problems suitable for your stage is not easy to find out there on the internet. After completing this I can get a superficial understanding of the course materials, but right now it's still difficult for me to write a simple code using the knowledge covered in this lecture. You need to find your own source to practice. | stars is because the assignments and | Exercise | Each chapter you only get 1 | Negative | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Professor is great, and the course gives a thorough introduction to python data structures and isn't too hard to get. The only reason that I would give 4 stars is because the assignments and exercises. Each chapter you only get 1 or 2 codes to write, which can be easily adapted from the codes showed online. I'm hoping for variety of coding exercises to better understand the concepts. Since coding problems suitable for your stage is not easy to find out there on the internet. After completing this I can get a superficial understanding of the course materials, but right now it's still difficult for me to write a simple code using the knowledge covered in this lecture. You need to find your own source to practice. | I'm hoping for variety of coding | Exercise | to better understand the concepts. Since | Negative | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I wish there were more exercises. | I wish there were more | Exercise | | Positive | 0.65 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The Professor is excellent and very student-friendly, and the course material is very clear. Two issues though: 1) List comprehensions should be introduced. They are extremely powerful and should really be introduced at this stage. 2) Charging $79 for this course seems like poor value for money, specially for a student like me. It doesn't go into great detail and the price point for what is a 5-6 hour course with simple exercises seems too high. | a 5-6 hour course with simple | Exercise | seems too high. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | the exercise are to easy | the | Exercise | are to easy | Positive | 0.65 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The instructor is a GOD. Never has anyone explained a programming language in such an easy to learn manner. Decent exercises overall. The course felt pretty easy. Please suggest some other materials that can help us learn data structures thoroughly. | an easy to learn manner. Decent | Exercise | overall. The course felt pretty easy. | Positive | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Enjoyed the way he broke everything down. If I were to make one critique, I'd like a section that had additional (optional) exercises to get extra practice to make sure the lessons are committed to memory. | a section that had additional (optional) | Exercise | to get extra practice to make | Negative | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Quick and easy introduction to useful Python data extraction tools. A great resource! I especially like that I can move through it at my own pace and move on to more interesting (to me) exercises. Thanks! | on to more interesting (to me) | Exercise | Thanks! | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Awesome second course from Chuck. He explains the material well and provides a great foundation in Python and coding. The mentors are responsive and helpful when you have questions, and the exercises are a good level of challenge but not so difficult they are frustrating. | when you have questions, and the | Exercise | are a good level of challenge | Negative | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Again like in Getting Started with Python course, I wish there was a way for us to get explanations for quiz questions after we complete a quiz, so we can fully understand them. I wish we could have something similar for when we complete the coding assignments, the worked exercises are helpful, but it would be helpful after we complete an assignment to have a code to compare ours to, to see the differences and to make sure we understand exactly what Dr. Chuck was getting at. There were several assignments that I completed, but not in the correct way, so the next weeks assignment was more difficult than it should have been. | complete the coding assignments, the worked | Exercise | are helpful, but it would be | Negative | 0.87 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | An excellent course overall. Dr. Chuck is great - very interesting to following during the video lectures. The quizzes and exercises are all challenging but not to the point where you cannot figure out what to do. | the video lectures. The quizzes and | Exercise | are all challenging but not to | Negative | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Really good course, I wish we could have more practical exercise but It is a really great way of learning! | wish we could have more practical | Exercise | but It is a really great | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Best course ever, As It not only introduce new concepts but also make them Clear with its working exercises and Assignments. | make them Clear with its working | Exercise | and Assignments. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Highly recommend! Dr.Chuck is so fun!!!!! Moreover, his teaching style is awesome. The exercise is awesome. It's completely worth the money and time I spent! | his teaching style is awesome. The | Exercise | is awesome. It's completely worth the | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Well developed, very clear and fast movement at the same time. Good exercises to practice. The method of teaching is encouraging and not boring at all. | movement at the same time. Good | Exercise | to practice. The method of teaching | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I won't say it was a comprehensive lesson on data structures but more than enough to get you started. Really enjoyed the lectures and Prof. Chuck's enthusiasm. I believe the exercises could have been a bit more challenging. | Prof. Chuck's enthusiasm. I believe the | Exercise | could have been a bit more | Negative | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Exercise were good. | | Exercise | were good. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I know Python but wanted to refresh and brush up my basics. I have not gone through the video lectures and doing the exercises directly. I found the exercises very well built. Good for learning the basics. | the video lectures and doing the | Exercise | directly. I found the exercises very | Negative | 0.71 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I know Python but wanted to refresh and brush up my basics. I have not gone through the video lectures and doing the exercises directly. I found the exercises very well built. Good for learning the basics. | the exercises directly. I found the | Exercise | very well built. Good for learning | Positive | 0.88 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. Loved the weekly exercise | Very good course. Loved the weekly | Exercise | | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | More coding exercises, as optional for example, would be nice. Otherwise good course and guide videos. | More coding | Exercise | as optional for example, would be | Negative | 0.69 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very interesting course and straightforward. the lecturer is really really good in explaining in an easy to follow way and his examples and exercises were using exactly the knowledge you have to gain from this course | follow way and his examples and | Exercise | were using exactly the knowledge you | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course , the material and exercise is very needful. | Great course , the material and | Exercise | is very needful. | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I benefited a lot from this course. It would be even better if more guided exercises are attached. | be even better if more guided | Exercise | are attached. | Negative | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Would like to have more exercises and maybe less and shorter videos. However I do appreciate the amount of work that has been put in creating this course but more fun exercises would not harm. | Would like to have more | Exercise | and maybe less and shorter videos. | Negative | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Would like to have more exercises and maybe less and shorter videos. However I do appreciate the amount of work that has been put in creating this course but more fun exercises would not harm. | creating this course but more fun | Exercise | would not harm. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Even if you are an experienced python developer, this course is a good review of the basic data structures. The assignments are great exercises. Dr. Chuck is a good instructor | data structures. The assignments are great | Exercise | Dr. Chuck is a good instructor | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The exercises were interesting and seems more real-world rather than the exercises you may find on some textbooks! | The | Exercise | were interesting and seems more real-world | Negative | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The exercises were interesting and seems more real-world rather than the exercises you may find on some textbooks! | seems more real-world rather than the | Exercise | you may find on some textbooks! | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I like the explanations and worked exercises. I also love the fact I can speed up the videos because sometimes it's too slow for my taste. | I like the explanations and worked | Exercise | I also love the fact I | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | pinpoints main python challenges about data parsing, and provides clever practice exercises (I understand now why and when using a tuple, dict or list). Good mindset... | data parsing, and provides clever practice | Exercise | (I understand now why and when | Positive | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This course covers python data structure very efficiently. The course mainly focuses on most commonly used features. Examples used in lectures as well as the exercises are very practical. | in lectures as well as the | Exercise | are very practical. | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | More optional exercises! | More optional | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Simply put and explained in clear terms.The coding exercises were great as well | explained in clear terms. The coding | Exercise | were great as well | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good explanations of data collection types that are used in python. Exercises could probably be a bit more challenging, but it will do for absolute beginners. Thank you. | types that are used in python. | Exercise | could probably be a bit more | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very cool professor, neat and clear instructions and exercises. might have been better with more detailed assignments even a final project. | professor, neat and clear instructions and | Exercise | might have been better with more | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Another great course. It was a little more disjointed than the first course of the specialisation, the exercises did not allow you to really get to grips with the full range of material discussed in the course but that was largely because the scope of coverage was so large. Maybe the deep dive will come in the later course... | first course of the specialisation, the | Exercise | did not allow you to really | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Offers outstanding depth in parallel concepts and the weekly programming samples are really interesting and fun. Some good community discussion but not a lot of participation by instructors. The theoretical material is covered very quickly and there are not a lot of practice exercises to master those concepts. | are not a lot of practice | Exercise | to master those concepts. | Negative | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | I expected more. Week 2 on streams in my opinion was a very strong week and well worth time and effort. Week 1, 2 and 3 were pretty weak in my opinion. I don't feel like I've learned much or that the exercises reflected what was being taught in the lectures. For example on week 4 the exercises do nothing with futures even though there's 6 lectures on them. Week 3 spends 3 long lectures how to build a discrete simulation application and exercises are about property checking. Course felt disjointed and not really finished. Would NOT recommend and definitely would not pay 79 USD for. | I've learned much or that the | Exercise | reflected what was being taught in | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | I expected more. Week 2 on streams in my opinion was a very strong week and well worth time and effort. Week 1, 2 and 3 were pretty weak in my opinion. I don't feel like I've learned much or that the exercises reflected what was being taught in the lectures. For example on week 4 the exercises do nothing with futures even though there's 6 lectures on them. Week 3 spends 3 long lectures how to build a discrete simulation application and exercises are about property checking. Course felt disjointed and not really finished. Would NOT recommend and definitely would not pay 79 USD for. | For example on week 4 the | Exercise | do nothing with futures even though | Negative | 0.95 | 2.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | I expected more. Week 2 on streams in my opinion was a very strong week and well worth time and effort. Week 1, 2 and 3 were pretty weak in my opinion. I don't feel like I've learned much or that the exercises reflected what was being taught in the lectures. For example on week 4 the exercises do nothing with futures even though there's 6 lectures on them. Week 3 spends 3 long lectures how to build a discrete simulation application and exercises are about property checking. Course felt disjointed and not really finished. Would NOT recommend and definitely would not pay 79 USD for. | build a discrete simulation application and | Exercise | are about property checking. Course felt | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Perfectly organized lectures and challenging exercises as before (With Principles course). Keep up the good work team. Thanks. | Perfectly organized lectures and challenging | Exercise | as before (With Principles course). Keep | Positive | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Some more example, practical exercises would be nice to add. | Some more example, practical | Exercise | would be nice to add. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It was a good quick overview. Something more indepth would have had some exercises but this gave a thorough snap shot. Thank you | more indepth would have had some | Exercise | but this gave a thorough snap | Negative | 0.89 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It's a perfect course, please add some exercises Thanks | a perfect course, please add some | Exercise | Thanks | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | An excellent course. Over a period of few weeks, a gradual change happened. The first most important step was making happiness enhancing decisions rather than proving myself right. Each of the exercises was very useful, especially the I forgive letter. The creative altruistic exercise was lots of fun. The expressing gratitude exercise was very moving. Birds eye view of MBA was very thought provoking and summed up the entire session differently and was very insightful. Thanks a lot Prof. Raj and team for the ALOHAF course. | proving myself right. Each of the | Exercise | was very useful, especially the I | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | An excellent course. Over a period of few weeks, a gradual change happened. The first most important step was making happiness enhancing decisions rather than proving myself right. Each of the exercises was very useful, especially the I forgive letter. The creative altruistic exercise was lots of fun. The expressing gratitude exercise was very moving. Birds eye view of MBA was very thought provoking and summed up the entire session differently and was very insightful. Thanks a lot Prof. Raj and team for the ALOHAF course. | I forgive letter. The creative altruistic | Exercise | was lots of fun. The expressing | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | An excellent course. Over a period of few weeks, a gradual change happened. The first most important step was making happiness enhancing decisions rather than proving myself right. Each of the exercises was very useful, especially the I forgive letter. The creative altruistic exercise was lots of fun. The expressing gratitude exercise was very moving. Birds eye view of MBA was very thought provoking and summed up the entire session differently and was very insightful. Thanks a lot Prof. Raj and team for the ALOHAF course. | lots of fun. The expressing gratitude | Exercise | was very moving. Birds eye view | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I enjoyed doing this course very much. The amount of research, references included in the study material makes it credible and easy to relate to. The assignment and exercises are also very helpful. | to relate to. The assignment and | Exercise | are also very helpful. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I'm absolutely loving this course! Prof Raj's presence just cheers me up..he's so bubbly and positive! The content is really excellent. Great to have all of this information in one place. I'm really enjoying the exercises too, thank you so much! | one place. I'm really enjoying the | Exercise | too, thank you so much! | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Love this course. Prof. Raj's happiness and enthusiasm is quite infectious. The gratitude, self compassion and creative altruism exercises leave one with a warm smile. | gratitude, self compassion and creative altruism | Exercise | leave one with a warm smile. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Lots of interesting information & exercises in this course, plus an enthusiastic teacher. Very enjoyable. | Lots of interesting information & | Exercise | in this course, plus an enthusiastic | Positive | 0.69 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Really nice class, I love the teachings and the exercise are very different and interesting too. | I love the teachings and the | Exercise | are very different and interesting too. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | What makes this course useful are the exercises so unless you are paying, don't bother, and it's not really worth paying for as it's just a synopsis of stuff you easily find on youtube. | makes this course useful are the | Exercise | so unless you are paying, don't | Negative | 0.99 | 1.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | In just 4 weeks...my own happiness levels have increased. I am enjoying life more. my health is improving. wonderful course. love the exercises and format this course has been presented in. Prof. Raj, awesome person! | is improving. wonderful course. love the | Exercise | and format this course has been | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Excellent! Learning about things and values you already know but in a scientific way. Great exercises that promote happiness and a unique way to introduce mindfulness. | but in a scientific way. Great | Exercise | that promote happiness and a unique | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very interesting course! I would suggest making the explanation for the exercises shorter. | suggest making the explanation for the | Exercise | shorter. | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This is such an insightful course, and provides many fun yet practical exercises on ways to increase your happiness. | and provides many fun yet practical | Exercise | on ways to increase your happiness. | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This is very interesting, life and happiness enhancing course, full of very intensive and useful exercises. I really recommend it if you are ready to change your life! | full of very intensive and useful | Exercise | I really recommend it if you | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I really enjoyed this course for many reasons. I found it very useful in helping me identify things that make me happy and how to experience them more often and also other aspects and habits of the highly happy. The exercises are very engaging, pushing the students out of their comfort zone just the right amount. Also, I found the teacher, Prof. Raj, to be a really nice, down-to-earth kind of guy, which made it easier for me to follow the course - not the best actor, but a great teacher ;). He is the kind of guy I would be happy to hang out with and share a beer or two :) | habits of the highly happy. The | Exercise | are very engaging, pushing the students | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I really enjoyed this course. The material was substantive, backed up with studies and ample research. The exercises and assignments were relevant and led to deep insights. I loved the videos, the dynamic cheerful tone and thorough coverage of material. One of the very best! | with studies and ample research. The | Exercise | and assignments were relevant and led | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course has been really eye opener. The research on happiness done by Prof. Mr Raj is amazing. The way the course is designed is very nice. There are systematic contents in every week. I must the exercises also are very good and I did not feel that I am doing this course on virtual platform. Kudos to all the team who have really put an effort to make this course available on Coursera! I would highly recommend this course to all my friends, colleagues and relatives. Cheers and Thank you. | in every week. I must the | Exercise | also are very good and I | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I really enjoyed this course, Raj's sense of humor kept the course interesting! I felt the reviews at the end of each module were too repetitive and unnecessary, and Catherine's explanation of the exercises too drawn out - they are simple exercises and I don't think they required and explanation other than what was there when you actually completed the exercise. Other than that, I feel that I learned quite a lot, and am grateful I took this course :) Thank you Raj! | unnecessary, and Catherine's explanation of the | Exercise | too drawn out - they are | Negative | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I really enjoyed this course, Raj's sense of humor kept the course interesting! I felt the reviews at the end of each module were too repetitive and unnecessary, and Catherine's explanation of the exercises too drawn out - they are simple exercises and I don't think they required and explanation other than what was there when you actually completed the exercise. Other than that, I feel that I learned quite a lot, and am grateful I took this course :) Thank you Raj! | drawn out - they are simple | Exercise | and I don't think they required | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I really enjoyed this course, Raj's sense of humor kept the course interesting! I felt the reviews at the end of each module were too repetitive and unnecessary, and Catherine's explanation of the exercises too drawn out - they are simple exercises and I don't think they required and explanation other than what was there when you actually completed the exercise. Other than that, I feel that I learned quite a lot, and am grateful I took this course :) Thank you Raj! | there when you actually completed the | Exercise | Other than that, I feel that | Negative | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | I you like lots of exercises to master your skills -- than this course is right for you. | I you like lots of | Exercise | to master your skills -- than | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | i learned a lot from this course , its fun and it has very good exercises | fun and it has very good | Exercise | | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | I could not finish because videos were stuttered - even with bigger bandwidth - and as a consequence I could not finish the course and the exercises in my limited free time (therefore, only 2 stars). Is the problem solved now - cause I d like to resume the course again. If that's more successful now I would start the next parts of the specialization. Thank you for an answer! | not finish the course and the | Exercise | in my limited free time (therefore, | Negative | 0.65 | 2.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is an excellent course. You are given a six month license to use Tableau as well as practice data for the assignments and exercises. It is very practical and informative. It covers more than just Tableau. The first week is about framing data questions and working with stakeholders. The second and third week cover Tableau. The last week gives some very helpful tips for giving effective presentations. The final assessment will go over all of these things, so be prepared to put them to use if you want the final certificate. | practice data for the assignments and | Exercise | It is very practical and informative. | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Absolutely outstanding course. It stretched me - late nights grappling with the data, learning Tableau, recording a blooper-free presentation. So many takes! But this course was not just about Tableau; it was about clarifying goals, planning before diving into the data, putting yourself in the shoes of the client and good presentation principles. Great practical exercise at the end - make sure you put aside plenty of time for this. | and good presentation principles. Great practical | Exercise | at the end - make sure | Positive | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Well-written exercises that really force you to get it. Plus you get a 6-month license so you can keep playing around with Tableau once you've finished the course. | Well-written | Exercise | that really force you to get | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course! The instructor is very clear and to the point. The exercises are challenging, fun and require a little bit of digging in that just takes the learning to a whole new level. A very rewarding experience. | clear and to the point. The | Exercise | are challenging, fun and require a | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent Course! The Quiz is quite challenging but really useful. All the exercises are well designed to guid you step by step to not only learn tableau software but also form an intuition of analyze real business data. I indeed recommend you fellows taking this course! It will be beneficial. | challenging but really useful. All the | Exercise | are well designed to guid you | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Nice course if anyone wants to learn Tableau. Practise exercises & Quizes are relevant. It would be nice if solutions are provided for both the practise excersies and the quizes. | anyone wants to learn Tableau. Practise | Exercise | & Quizes are relevant. It would | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Awesome course for those who wish to learn Tableau. Real-life project / dataset , in-depth exercises and a free 6-month license for Tableau desktop makes it extremely easy to practice, play and get expertise with both data analysis and Tableau software. The tips and resources for giving great presentations are like icing on the cake! i've taken 10+ classes on Coursera and this is definitely one of the best! Thank you Duke univ and coursera! :) | Real-life project / dataset , in-depth | Exercise | and a free 6-month license for | Negative | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | The content is good but should be more organized. More instructions and explanation should be provided for exercises. Particularly, the auto grading system should be improved. Besides a simple term like "compile error", more explanation should be provided to help students debugging. | and explanation should be provided for | Exercise | Particularly, the auto grading system should | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | the fundamental of planning algorithm, basic algorithm: Dijkstra, A*, RRT, artificial potential. Some exercises' requirement should be more detail. | Dijkstra, A*, RRT, artificial potential. Some | Exercise | requirement should be more detail. | Negative | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | In this course we will get to know about shortest path algorithm such A*, Dijkstra's, concept of configuration space and path planning in the same, developing Probabilistic road maps and RRT and also a bit about Artificial potenial fields. All the algorithms are neatly explained. The material though very short(in terms of total hours of video lectures) is nicely compiled. The quality of the MATLAB exercises is very good with few issues here and there. We can extract a lot about MATLAB implementation of different simulations by spending time understanding the given code and also implementing missing sections as part of the assignment. Overall, a great course. | compiled. The quality of the MATLAB | Exercise | is very good with few issues | Positive | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | This course provides a deeper insight into financial and nonfinancial performance on a pragmatic basis. However the course itself is really brief and the exercises cannot thoroughly provide reliable measure of the understanding of the lectures. | itself is really brief and the | Exercise | cannot thoroughly provide reliable measure of | Negative | 0.72 | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I liked this course. It was very interesting and informative. This course contains many practical exercises and it really helped me in English. Thanks! | informative. This course contains many practical | Exercise | and it really helped me in | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The concepts are good and important, writing the assignments was not so easy :) It feels like there is a missing link between the concepts & the writing the documents. For example -the last exercise (prototype) was not good at all for most people I checked (including myself?). On a secondary importance level: some of the questions/answers are hard to understand or related to extras (movies, for example) I did not I need to see, so it was a bit frustrating. | the documents. For example -the last | Exercise | (prototype) was not good at all | Negative | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | This Course is nice , but it is too theoretical. Instructor should include concrete assignments and mathematics with modelling exercises in the Course. | concrete assignments and mathematics with modelling | Exercise | in the Course. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course material and Assignments. Good assignment in the end to exercise grey cells. | Good assignment in the end to | Exercise | grey cells. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Its such an awesome course but need a lot of practice apart from the practice exercises. If we don't make a note of the concepts or didn't practice we cant memorize anything. Jeff Leek, he is such a great professor. I think he is the best when it comes to explaining something. I am doing Data Science Specialization. | of practice apart from the practice | Exercise | If we don't make a note | Negative | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is a good overview to R Programming, though the lectures leave much to be desired, at least for a programming beginner. Watching the videos left me confused about key concepts, which I absorbed much better through the Swirl interactive exercises, the discussion forums and other examples online. Of course we are supposed to be "hackers," but I enjoyed this course much more once I just turned off the video, read through the slides and focused on other areas where I could learn the concepts. Also, the discussion forums were great for helping with key issues, and the homework assignments were also outstanding for making sure you absorb and apply concepts. So it's worth taking - just keep in mind the videos may not be for everyone... | much better through the Swirl interactive | Exercise | the discussion forums and other examples | Negative | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The swirl exercises were helpful, but the video lectures and assignments were not. | The swirl | Exercise | were helpful, but the video lectures | Negative | 0.78 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The course content and the assignments are too far apart. I would have learned more if it was better aligned and there were some exercise in between. | better aligned and there were some | Exercise | in between. | Negative | 0.67 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Challenging course but definitely worth it. It makeThe swirl exercises are a great help. | definitely worth it. It makeThe swirl | Exercise | are a great help. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great course for beginners! Informative, well-structured and straightforward. The "SWIRL" exercises and the introduction to GitHub are also very useful. | well-structured and straightforward. The " SWIRL" | Exercise | and the introduction to GitHub are | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I will recommend it 100% for those who want to learn R. There are good teachers, explanations, assignments... But it may have some tricky exercises for those who have not programmed before. | But it may have some tricky | Exercise | for those who have not programmed | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course was a good experience, but I wish there were more explained tasks of difficult functions and loops before giving difficult exercises. Also I find this course a little bit boring for me and sometimes very difficult (especially in peer graided assignment) | functions and loops before giving difficult | Exercise | Also I find this course a | Positive | 0.66 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Need way more content, and accesibility to begginers, gap between theory and practical exercises is too big! | begginers, gap between theory and practical | Exercise | is too big! | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Quite difficult, and you certainly need to work hard to figure out the exercises. The lectures get you started but don't have all the answers. Not one for people who want to be spoonfed. | work hard to figure out the | Exercise | The lectures get you started but | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | very good introductory course. It was very fun and challenging overall. Especially for the last exercise | challenging overall. Especially for the last | Exercise | | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The swirl exercises are truly informative. | The swirl | Exercise | are truly informative. | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I like the whole experience, but there are some gaps between sessions and weekly projects. I think this course can be improved with adding small tests between each session and providing several exercises as complimentary material. For understanding many topics I watch many other videos on youtube till I grasp the concept. | between each session and providing several | Exercise | as complimentary material. For understanding many | Positive | 0.91 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A great course! The swirl exercises are perfect to stud and the teacher has a perfect communication. | A great course! The swirl | Exercise | are perfect to stud and the | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | the swirl exercise along with the course makes much more sense | the swirl | Exercise | along with the course makes much | Positive | 0.87 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It was very difficult for me to follow the exercises, since I don't have a programming background. | difficult for me to follow the | Exercise | since I don't have a programming | Negative | 0.67 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good exercises and challenging course, but very hard if you do not know any R beforehand. | Good | Exercise | and challenging course, but very hard | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good exercises for beginners | good | Exercise | for beginners | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | There is not much of a relation between what the course gives (explains with the videos and with the SWIRL exercises) and the real exercices they ask to. Too difficult to follow by people new in the programming area. | the videos and with the SWIRL | Exercise | and the real exercices they ask | Positive | 0.71 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I really struggled - coming from a zero programming background. I recommend tons of reading, practical exercises, swirl is a bit of a savior and so is stackoverflow. Even with all of that, I struggled to get my mind to think like a programmer and structure the thoughts into plans for the assignments and tests. I think there needs to be a course before this that teaches one what the first step of solving a programming-related problem; eg one that focuses on flow charts, breaking down the question, etc... It literally is like learning a new language : you need to keep reading and practicing and watching/listening to others do it until you start to get it. | I recommend tons of reading, practical | Exercise | swirl is a bit of a | Positive | 0.98 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | R Programming has solid information and exercises on just that! However the videos and sections for each week are not very clearly structured. Sometimes the end assignment can take many times the number of hours the rest of the content in a week requires. I'd be careful about taking this course while working unless you can devote serious time to programming projects on your off days. That stated, the course is excellent otherwise. | R Programming has solid information and | Exercise | on just that! However the videos | Positive | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Videos are poorly narrated and are marginally effective: vocabulary + key concepts only. The "swirl" exercises are woefully inadequate to prepare students for the quizzes. Foundational tasks (i.e. establishing a valid connection to the sample data) are conspicuously absent from the guided exercises; leaving too many students to seek help from message boards and google. Lastly, the "professors" are completely unreachable: they may as well be dead. After 30 years in the IT industry, I found this course to be profoundly aggravating and a complete waste of my time - I have abandoned this course and bought a "Teach Yourself" book instead. | key concepts only. The " swirl" | Exercise | are woefully inadequate to prepare students | Negative | 0.81 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It feels like this course was abandoned by the instructors. The Programming Assignments are practically impossible to be done unless you have previous programming experience. Other than swirl, it would be very helpful if there were basic optional exercises for those who have never programmed before. I worked hard to be able to follow it, but if I knew how uninvolved the instructors were, I would have saved my money and spent it on a course with active involvement from those who developed it. Disappointing. | helpful if there were basic optional | Exercise | for those who have never programmed | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good intro to R programming. Like the assignment project and swirl package to help on hands-on R programming exercise. Even I didn't pay for the specialization, I love the way assignment is organized and gives expected output/results to your code, so I get to know if my code is correct or not. | to help on hands-on R programming | Exercise | Even I didn't pay for the | Negative | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course. Good videos, very nice programming exercises. Perfect for someone who wants to learn R for the first time. | course. Good videos, very nice programming | Exercise | Perfect for someone who wants to | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great course to start getting your hands into R. While the lectures are OK and the Swirl exercises are great, the course falls a bit short in building you up to tackling the weekly programming assignments. I had to spend a lot of time researching on my own to complete the assignments. I don't mind that, but I could do that on my own without paying for the course. I'm paying because I want to learn R quickly without spending hours researching what could have easily been described in the lectures. A lot of times, the course mentors in the discussion forums provided the best guidance. I would have liked each programming exercise to build upon the last one, so that at the end of the course I would have a great R product to review later. As it is, each programming assignment can stand on its own. When learning to programming in a new language, I prefer small, quick victories that build upon one another to accomplish a great task. This is the reason for not giving full 5-stars. Otherwise, Dr. Peng does a good job at providing material. And, be sure to check out his podcast, Not So Standard Deviations, to remind you that even people who have been in this field for years still find some areas challenging. It gives us R beginners some mental support. | lectures are OK and the Swirl | Exercise | are great, the course falls a | Positive | 0.72 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great course to start getting your hands into R. While the lectures are OK and the Swirl exercises are great, the course falls a bit short in building you up to tackling the weekly programming assignments. I had to spend a lot of time researching on my own to complete the assignments. I don't mind that, but I could do that on my own without paying for the course. I'm paying because I want to learn R quickly without spending hours researching what could have easily been described in the lectures. A lot of times, the course mentors in the discussion forums provided the best guidance. I would have liked each programming exercise to build upon the last one, so that at the end of the course I would have a great R product to review later. As it is, each programming assignment can stand on its own. When learning to programming in a new language, I prefer small, quick victories that build upon one another to accomplish a great task. This is the reason for not giving full 5-stars. Otherwise, Dr. Peng does a good job at providing material. And, be sure to check out his podcast, Not So Standard Deviations, to remind you that even people who have been in this field for years still find some areas challenging. It gives us R beginners some mental support. | I would have liked each programming | Exercise | to build upon the last one, | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Only problem was the large gap between the assignments and lectures. Swirl exercises should not be optional as they are the most helpful part of the course. | between the assignments and lectures. Swirl | Exercise | should not be optional as they | Positive | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The lectures and Swirl exercises are extremely easy to understand and follow, but then the assignments are incredibly complicated and difficult. The assignments ask for techniques that aren't focused on or even covered in the lectures. The tips offered by Al Warren in the Discussion forum make the assignments possible to do. Since the tips are so critical to understanding and completing the assignments, I think Al Warren's tips should be incorporated as part of the core course. This course needs more time to be covered in depth - it's a lot of ground to cover in just one month, | The lectures and Swirl | Exercise | are extremely easy to understand and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The course covers a lot of different topics related to R programming. I think the course explain a lot of important concepts. In my opinion the level of the videos too simple and is needed to do the practical part by yourself using swift in the console. This way you learn about what you need otherwise the class exercises are pretty complicated. | what you need otherwise the class | Exercise | are pretty complicated. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is a fast-paced and autodidact course. You'll learn in a real life environment (unlike the incredibly boring DataCamp courses). Instead of providing exercises you must be curious and learn and look for whatever you want. The quizzes were always challenging, sometimes going beyond the course material -which is, in my opinion, a great decission-. I learned in a month what I could have learned in 3 or 4 with DataCamp. I thank Roger D. Peng for making this course possible. | boring DataCamp courses). Instead of providing | Exercise | you must be curious and learn | Negative | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Nice course but should have more practice exercises and Coursera should make interface more interactive. | course but should have more practice | Exercise | and Coursera should make interface more | Negative | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I miss practical exercises that can be used to prepare the quiz | I miss practical | Exercise | that can be used to prepare | Positive | 0.64 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This class is packed with clear, concise and useful information. The level of difficulty was perfect for me. I learned through well designed exercises the fundamentals of R | me. I learned through well designed | Exercise | the fundamentals of R | Positive | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great overview. The Swirl exercises are wonderful for "teaching a person to fish". | Great overview. The Swirl | Exercise | are wonderful for " teaching a | Positive | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I am really unhappy with this course. Coming to R with some background in statistics and SQL, but lacking programming experience, I assumed this would be an introduction. The material in the lectures is straightforward enough, and the swirl exercises are easy to get through and informative, but the assignments are, without exception, based on writing functions in R with basically zero experience. Having no background or frame of reference for best practices in syntax, logic, etc, and very little information in the lectures or supplementary material to help, I found these to be almost impossible to complete. Furthermore, there's no mechanism or provision in the course to review the assignments after they're submitted. So not only did I not feel like I was doing the work correctly, I can't get feedback, and the lecturer doesn't break down the rationale behind the assignment, and how he would have done it or why. In addition, the assignments bear only a tangential relationship to the lecture material. So I would be feeling good coming out of a lecture and going through swirl exercises, only to be plunged into a programming assignment that was far too advanced for the small steps I felt I had taken in my overall competence with the language and material. I don't doubt that someone with better knowledge of programming can get through this stuff, but this class should be reserved for advanced learners only, or maybe be broken up into two courses. I feel like I wasted $49. | is straightforward enough, and the swirl | Exercise | are easy to get through and | Positive | 0.89 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I am really unhappy with this course. Coming to R with some background in statistics and SQL, but lacking programming experience, I assumed this would be an introduction. The material in the lectures is straightforward enough, and the swirl exercises are easy to get through and informative, but the assignments are, without exception, based on writing functions in R with basically zero experience. Having no background or frame of reference for best practices in syntax, logic, etc, and very little information in the lectures or supplementary material to help, I found these to be almost impossible to complete. Furthermore, there's no mechanism or provision in the course to review the assignments after they're submitted. So not only did I not feel like I was doing the work correctly, I can't get feedback, and the lecturer doesn't break down the rationale behind the assignment, and how he would have done it or why. In addition, the assignments bear only a tangential relationship to the lecture material. So I would be feeling good coming out of a lecture and going through swirl exercises, only to be plunged into a programming assignment that was far too advanced for the small steps I felt I had taken in my overall competence with the language and material. I don't doubt that someone with better knowledge of programming can get through this stuff, but this class should be reserved for advanced learners only, or maybe be broken up into two courses. I feel like I wasted $49. | a lecture and going through swirl | Exercise | only to be plunged into a | Negative | 0.76 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The Data Science specialisation with John Hopkins University is definitely worthwhile and, as a relative novice in the area, I'd highly rate and recommend R Programming. The lecturer Mr Peng presents the information in a clear and concise way, conducting walk-throughs of different steps, and providing opportunity for practice exercises. As well, the accompanying book published by the lecturer, learning materials, mentor Mr Warren and discussion board are invaluable for beginners like myself. Thank you for a terrific course so far. | steps, and providing opportunity for practice | Exercise | As well, the accompanying book published | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I must confess that this course is difficult for who is beginning programming with R, the assignments require a lot of work and they are very involved. Nevertheless, I´m extremely satisfied. The book and the lectures are very good and the quizes and exercises forces you to really understand what you are doing or you cannot pass...it is what I really wanted! Thank you Coursera and special thanks to the instructor for his great work! | very good and the quizes and | Exercise | forces you to really understand what | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Awesome! It's a well-designed course for a beginner. The quizes and assignments ensured that I took an effort to browse and learn a couple of concepts in depth. Swirl exercises gave me a better understanding of what I've learnt from the vedio lectures. All in all, at the end of one month, you'll know all quick and dirty tricks to deal with huge datasets. Thank you! | couple of concepts in depth. Swirl | Exercise | gave me a better understanding of | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It is a very well organised course. I really like the swirl assignment programming assignments. It for doing exercise and learning at the same time. I am very much impressed and learning a lot. | assignment programming assignments. It for doing | Exercise | and learning at the same time. | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I wanted to love this course so bad but unfortunately I couldn't. There was a great distance from what was taught in the lectures and what was asked for you to do in the assignments... and It's not a matter of knowing how to program. I know Ruby and Python but R is a very peculiar language itself. Perhaps they should invest more on gradual exercises like the one they advised to do on github or some easy statistical exercises... Now I don't know if I should take the next module or if I should look for something out of here where I can learn R. I see potential on this course. | they should invest more on gradual | Exercise | like the one they advised to | Negative | 0.79 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I wanted to love this course so bad but unfortunately I couldn't. There was a great distance from what was taught in the lectures and what was asked for you to do in the assignments... and It's not a matter of knowing how to program. I know Ruby and Python but R is a very peculiar language itself. Perhaps they should invest more on gradual exercises like the one they advised to do on github or some easy statistical exercises... Now I don't know if I should take the next module or if I should look for something out of here where I can learn R. I see potential on this course. | on github or some easy statistical | Exercise | . . Now I don't know | Negative | 0.76 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Too short, too simple, too theoretic. I found of little interest the slides, partially interesting the swirl exercise, interesting the programming assignment. I would like to have a longer course with more practical examples. | the slides, partially interesting the swirl | Exercise | interesting the programming assignment. I would | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The exercises ae far more advanced than the lectures and study materials. | The | Exercise | ae far more advanced than the | Positive | 0.64 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is a good starting point for learning the bits and pieces of R. It shows you how to work with data in a fairly easy manner. The course is well explained and the exercises are challenging. | course is well explained and the | Exercise | are challenging. | Positive | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I love R. This course is a great introduction to being programming in R. It is not easy, and this is the 4th time I have enrolled and will finally be completing the course (yay!). Plan to watch all videos (I watch them on 3/4 speed) and re-watch many of them for clarification. It may be easier for those with prior programming experience. Don't let week 2 get you down, do the SWIRL exercises, and ask for help from your classmates. | get you down, do the SWIRL | Exercise | and ask for help from your | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very poorly constructed. There are major jumps in the difficulty of material that are completely unnecessary. The material could very easily be broken down into more manageable and comprehensible chunks. There is no repetition of any exercise or function to engrain any of the material. This course suffers grossly from the "curse of knowledge". If it were structured in a way where (a) material was broken down into smaller bits, ideally as beta tested by true rank novices and (b) all materials or specific functions were presented with repetition, similar to how khan academy structures its math section, then this course would be much better. I would also assume, given a and b, that there would be higher retention and comprehension. The expected time requirements are also wildly amiss. Try beta testing this on TRUE rank novices. The program suggests that this is for "beginners". I find it doubtful that a true beginner would fare well in this course. | There is no repetition of any | Exercise | or function to engrain any of | Negative | 0.96 | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The video lectures were engaging with interesting tidbits thrown in to make the potentially dull topic not dull. I personally liked the rhythm and pace with which Dr Peng delivered the content. Also, the swirl exercises are a critical element of this course and I often found it effective to sandwich the swirl exercises between the video and the quiz. Doing this provided an incentive to complete the swirl practice and also made the quiz/assignment less of an exercise in 'dart-throwing' and more of validating what you've learned. Overall, great course to get started with R! | delivered the content. Also, the swirl | Exercise | are a critical element of this | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The video lectures were engaging with interesting tidbits thrown in to make the potentially dull topic not dull. I personally liked the rhythm and pace with which Dr Peng delivered the content. Also, the swirl exercises are a critical element of this course and I often found it effective to sandwich the swirl exercises between the video and the quiz. Doing this provided an incentive to complete the swirl practice and also made the quiz/assignment less of an exercise in 'dart-throwing' and more of validating what you've learned. Overall, great course to get started with R! | it effective to sandwich the swirl | Exercise | between the video and the quiz. | Positive | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The video lectures were engaging with interesting tidbits thrown in to make the potentially dull topic not dull. I personally liked the rhythm and pace with which Dr Peng delivered the content. Also, the swirl exercises are a critical element of this course and I often found it effective to sandwich the swirl exercises between the video and the quiz. Doing this provided an incentive to complete the swirl practice and also made the quiz/assignment less of an exercise in 'dart-throwing' and more of validating what you've learned. Overall, great course to get started with R! | made the quiz/assignment less of an | Exercise | in 'dart-throwing' and more of validating | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is a challenging course because there is a marked gap between the video lectures and the weekly assignments. This course will be far more demanding of your time and willingness to fail that the Data Scientist's Toolbox. If you have the time and resilience to search out support materials and frequently peruse the Discussion threads, you will be able to find what you need. My peers with programming experience confirmed that there is too wide a gap between the content delivered in the video lectures and the demands of the coding assignments. If you decide to take this course, be sure to do the swirl exercises so you get a feel of how the R functions work. When you grade your peers' work, you might notice that more than a few decided to plagiarize code from others. The videos need to be redone. Effective instructors know that students learn by seeing examples, not by listening to broad descriptions of what a function can do. | be sure to do the swirl | Exercise | so you get a feel of | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good course with perfect interactive exercises | good course with perfect interactive | Exercise | | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Wonderful course! I had never programmed in R before and this gave me all of the foundational tools I needed. It gives you just the right amount of hand-holding while also requiring you to think critically about what you've learned and what you need to use to accomplish the assignments. I highly recommend this course to anyone interested in learning R. Also, the "Swirl" library that was used for basic R exercises was fantastic. | that was used for basic R | Exercise | was fantastic. | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course. I learn a ton. I'm already a programmer in a different language, yet I still found the class appropriately challenging. The lessons and exercises gave me enough information to know what I was trying to accomplish and where to find the answers, without spoon feeding me solutions. That suits me well, because I learn more from figuring things out than I do from regurgitating information. | class appropriately challenging. The lessons and | Exercise | gave me enough information to know | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Great course. I have been recommending it to friends and family. The seminar style effectively keeps the course dynamic. I came away with a thorough understanding of how positive emotions promote health and wellbeing, physically, emotionally and psychologically, generally and personally. Additionally, there are numerous exercises and practices that allow the students to apply the principles into one's own life. | and personally. Additionally, there are numerous | Exercise | and practices that allow the students | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good. Easy to understand with simple exercises. Lots of things are learnt. But better be more interesting with more ways of presenting and showing. | Good. Easy to understand with simple | Exercise | Lots of things are learnt. But | Positive | 0.89 | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | A terrific course that has helped me change my life. I really liked the mindfulness medication exercises. And I'm reading Dr. Fredrickson's books on positive psychology. The positive energy this brought into my life is fantastic!! | I really liked the mindfulness medication | Exercise | And I'm reading Dr. Fredrickson's books | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I found this course very interesting and stimulating. The lectures were conducted in a friendly atmosphere and it was well paced. The various exercises were a revelation and I believe that this information has enabled me to value my relationships with other people to a greater level. | it was well paced. The various | Exercise | were a revelation and I believe | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | An exceptional course which mix sciencie and positivity with great examples and exercises, and definitely one of the best scientist/teacher I´ve met, Barbara Fredrickson. Congratulations for this great course. | and positivity with great examples and | Exercise | and definitely one of the best | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I found the presentation of the topic very convincing: I'll try to foster micro-moments of positivity resonance in the future and I am fully convinced that this will have a significant positive impact on my life. The videos were good: not too long and each making a point. I'm not a big fan of the round table format, but I admit it was appropriate for the topic. The only aspect where I see room for improvement is the type of assignments: the quiz was part of the course but the weekly exercise was not. It is maybe worthwhile to create some little assignments with a peer-review, to foster a deeper investment of the participants into the course. | of the course but the weekly | Exercise | was not. It is maybe worthwhile | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I loved the set up of the course that Professor Frederikson included other professors and professionals in her class. It made the class lively and presented different point of views or different examples. The homework/ exercises were very interesting and thought provoking. I would recommend this class to anyone and in particular to people who do not believe that having a positive attitude / outlook in life will / can make a difference in so many different ways. I am looking forward to an additional course on positive psychology in the future. | views or different examples. The homework/ | Exercise | were very interesting and thought provoking. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | An instructive way to enhance and streamline the positive side of life. I learnt that positive emotions are as essential as a healthy diet, good sleep and daily exercises. Dr. Barbara Fredrickson radiates positivity. | healthy diet, good sleep and daily | Exercise | Dr. Barbara Fredrickson radiates positivity. | Positive | 0.78 | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very well structured. Information complete and good exercises. | well structured. Information complete and good | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | It was a really good course, very easy to understand and was good in keeping the interest up. I would only recommend they offered some, at least optional, exercises to help grasp the content. | they offered some, at least optional, | Exercise | to help grasp the content. | Negative | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I learned much more in this course than other courses about quantitative methods. It is clear and useful and inspiring. The quizzes are very good, because they are not only about konwledge,but also about whether you can apply the knowledge. And the interviews are very good too, which give us more information in different subjiects, or from different perspectives. But I feel the speaker's speaking speed is a little fast, and I hope that there will be exercise or quizzes in which we are given situation,and asked to come up with RQ, methods, analysis, etc. | I hope that there will be | Exercise | or quizzes in which we are | Positive | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent! The course is extremely well thought over and executed, even in minor aspects of the course, like scripts, additional pieces of information, exams, created just for practice with feedback, great exercises. The content is highly relevant, well structured and illustrated, clearly laid out. The course is very challenging, thought provoking and stimulating, though it is not an easy course. | just for practice with feedback, great | Exercise | The content is highly relevant, well | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very few amount of exercise and very small gain of knowledge from Capstone. | Very few amount of | Exercise | and very small gain of knowledge | Positive | 0.78 | 2.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | I expected more practical exercises. but I did learn some | I expected more practical | Exercise | but I did learn some | Negative | 0.93 | 2.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | 5 stars for inspiring gazillion confidence with the exercises 3 stars for not pushing us hard during capstone Mean of 4 Nah !! Actually 5 Its perfect ! | for inspiring gazillion confidence with the | Exercise | 3 stars for not pushing us | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Rwzrl_9rEeS9ISIACxWDhA | Very informative course with good exercises. Would recommend having PDE example code, as well. | Very informative course with good | Exercise | Would recommend having PDE example code, | Positive | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| s0uHeCzMEeWPngoW78wA_Q | My overall experience with this Specialization, in general, and this 1st Course, in particular, is very positive. On the positive side, I really like the fact that the Courses are practice-oriented and provide not only theoretical frameworks, but also insights from experts, practical guidance, and evidence-based best practices. Also, the idea of applying Team-Based Learning (TBL), in the forms of Readiness Assurance Tests (RATs) and scenario-based RAT Application Exercises, for assessing participants' learning, is excellent! However, there are a couple of downsides, that's why I'm not giving a 5 star positive feedback. The first problem is that not all of the required readings are freely available via the Coursera platform, or elsewhere online. I appreciate the excellent quality of the chosen materials, but, if it becomes compulsory to spend more than US $100 for buying books, then the total cost of this Specialization elevates quite a lot, given that I had to pay €162 for it. On my opinion, there should be at least a note in the description of both the Specialization and the Courses about these requirements, in order to make an informed decision before enrolling. The second downside has to do with Course 1 and Course 2 overlapping materials. I'm referring to guest interview videos. That's mainly a problem of the 2nd Course, as there are almost no guest interviews in this Course, and the one interview provided is already available in Course 1. I understand that the topics discussed apply to the topics of both Courses, but, still, I find it an unnecessary repetition. The last problem is about the dates that the Courses are run. Course 1 runs during a given period, Course 2 is on demand, but it makes sense to attend it before Course 3, that also runs during a given period, which overlaps with the period of the 1st Course. Sorry, this makes it very difficult to attend everything and to seriously focus, as it's always about running for deadlines, especially when one has to produce three (3) Board Effectiveness Assessment Reflection (BEAR) papers :( . | Tests (RATs) and scenario-based RAT Application | Exercise | for assessing participants' learning, is excellent! | Positive | 0.97 | 4.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | I liked the course, with its many different speakers and approaches. The one thing I missed the most was seeing the models in action. Even if the course isn't aimed at scientists or programmers, there are free online simulations where one can adjust model constants to see the effects interactively without any knowledge required. See NetLogo at http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/, for which there are forest fire, disease spread in networks, cellular automatas and many other interactive simulations. Insight providing questions may involve finding the value of a parameter such as the epidemic can't spread, for instance. For more formula oriented optional exercises, I would recommend something similar to Differential Equations in Action from Udacity. It's a relatively easy course implementing the SIR model, physics and ABS. An exercise could be "modify the simulation to consider X% germs get resistant after each antibiotic treatment" (either in NetLogo, or Python). | instance. For more formula oriented optional | Exercise | I would recommend something similar to | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | I liked the course, with its many different speakers and approaches. The one thing I missed the most was seeing the models in action. Even if the course isn't aimed at scientists or programmers, there are free online simulations where one can adjust model constants to see the effects interactively without any knowledge required. See NetLogo at http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/, for which there are forest fire, disease spread in networks, cellular automatas and many other interactive simulations. Insight providing questions may involve finding the value of a parameter such as the epidemic can't spread, for instance. For more formula oriented optional exercises, I would recommend something similar to Differential Equations in Action from Udacity. It's a relatively easy course implementing the SIR model, physics and ABS. An exercise could be "modify the simulation to consider X% germs get resistant after each antibiotic treatment" (either in NetLogo, or Python). | SIR model, physics and ABS. An | Exercise | could be " modify the simulation | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Content is good, but exercises could be improved, should also add a few interactive quizzes (e.g. a quiz before the segment to ask what they think are the 3 - 4 factors of X,Y,Z; then a quiz at end to summarize). Also add sources. | Content is good, but | Exercise | could be improved, should also add | Negative | 0.66 | 3.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The content is laid out very well and I found a ton of useful take-away points. Thank you to all the faculty members. I particularly enjoyed the assignments - they really make you think. But I found the branding you - audit and insights the best exercise in this program. I would definitely recommend this to friends and colleagues. | - audit and insights the best | Exercise | in this program. I would definitely | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The final assignment could use a little bit of work, from a clarity standpoint. I actually think that the exercise is quite rewarding, but the expectations of, and directions for participants aren't entirely clear (and that's coming from a native English speaker). | standpoint. I actually think that the | Exercise | is quite rewarding, but the expectations | Positive | 0.74 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | nice syllabus overall with great exercises. wish it would teach more commonly used excel skills in business e.g. pivot tables, index-match, vlookup etc. lectures were a bit hard to follow (esp the mathy ones) - i'd suggest reworking the blackboard craft | nice syllabus overall with great | Exercise | wish it would teach more commonly | Positive | 0.97 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The class has great concept but it needs a bit more structure and change to hit its full potential. The Good:-The spreadsheets and exercises along with Quiz material. The project was also very informative. The Bad:- The video need to better explain how Area Under Curve and how the Credit model make sense. It was not very intuitive and I struggled for over 2 weeks to put the Project together due to this gap. But a worthwhile class with great potential. I am glad I took it. | full potential. The Good:-The spreadsheets and | Exercise | along with Quiz material. The project | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Lots of good information. However, this course could be structured a lit bit better. More examples and small practice exercises within the lectures would significantly improve the retention of material. You should posses at least basic knowledge of statistics. | better. More examples and small practice | Exercise | within the lectures would significantly improve | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent course. Focusses mainly on data analysis in Excel rather that teaching you all excel function. A good way to learn both. I recommend anyone interested in data analysis to take this course. The exercises are challenging to answer. It's fun solving them | analysis to take this course. The | Exercise | are challenging to answer. It's fun | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very challenging and wish there were more exercises throughout to strengthen understanding. | challenging and wish there were more | Exercise | throughout to strengthen understanding. | Positive | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course! Excellent videos and good exercises. | Great course! Excellent videos and good | Exercise | | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Excellent course, way beyond my expectations. Useful lessons and exercises, nice lectures and assingments!!! I recommend it to any teacher or parent. | beyond my expectations. Useful lessons and | Exercise | nice lectures and assingments! ! ! | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| svzDI2FSEeW6DxKCi866Kw | Very good class - many examples brought in to the lectures and exercises help with comprehension. | brought in to the lectures and | Exercise | help with comprehension. | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Very good exercise to pick up PIG and AWS environment. It is best to pick up jupyter notebook prior to taking this class for the first exercise. I like how David has been able to present so much content in a 3 weeks lesson. | Very good | Exercise | to pick up PIG and AWS | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Very good exercise to pick up PIG and AWS environment. It is best to pick up jupyter notebook prior to taking this class for the first exercise. I like how David has been able to present so much content in a 3 weeks lesson. | taking this class for the first | Exercise | I like how David has been | Positive | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| SzQW47gfEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | The powerpoints and audio lectures are very clear and concise, much appreciated. I would also appreciate more exercises or reading materials, to help solidify our understanding of the topics. | appreciated. I would also appreciate more | Exercise | or reading materials, to help solidify | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | very clear examples, relatively slow pace, which allows you to understand and exercise a lot | which allows you to understand and | Exercise | a lot | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Exercises should be better designed and I think that first week of this course and the whole previous one are too basic. They could be assumed for 99% of people and I think it would be a good idea to create an optional preparation module containing them. That would save time and perhaps open opportunities for more advanced material to be included. | | Exercise | should be better designed and I | Negative | 0.84 | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Nothing new and no challenging exercises. It could be more interactive | Nothing new and no challenging | Exercise | It could be more interactive | Negative | 0.98 | 1.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | Very open way of learning. Few talks with people from the industry, sharing their approach. Not much of fundamental knowledge. Generally great motivator to exercise Character Design. Not that great resource to learn from a beginning. | fundamental knowledge. Generally great motivator to | Exercise | Character Design. Not that great resource | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | I would have liked to get input on my work by an instructor instead of just other students, but it was a good exercise to hone my skills. I wouldn't pay for credit because I feel like my work isn't being professionally graded. | students, but it was a good | Exercise | to hone my skills. I wouldn't | Negative | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | Guest artists were AMAZING and the weekly exercises productive. Thanks Fran. | artists were AMAZING and the weekly | Exercise | productive. Thanks Fran. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | It's a great course I strongly recommend. Not only you are going to practise different character design through various exercises, but you are going to watch some great artist talking about their work while they are drawing. So interesting! | practise different character design through various | Exercise | but you are going to watch | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Amazing course. I loved each lesson, the examples, the methodology, the teacher is Amazing!!! (Feel like we're friends now!) Very easy to follow exercises and achievable assignments. | now! ) Very easy to follow | Exercise | and achievable assignments. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Superb presentation of objective methods to approach negotiations, with exercises and | objective methods to approach negotiations, with | Exercise | and | Positive | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | This course is great. There is excellent training material and the live exercises add a lot of value. There is a lot of very good theory, which is very useable, pleasantly explained, articulated very well and highly memorable. I love the principled approach that is used and the concepts that are explained. | excellent training material and the live | Exercise | add a lot of value. There | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Great professor, very well explained step-by-step content and practical exercises | well explained step-by-step content and practical | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The ideas are brilliantly presented and the exercises are relevant | ideas are brilliantly presented and the | Exercise | are relevant | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good overview over a topical area - more in-depth exercises for testing one's own understanding might have been helpful | a topical area - more in-depth | Exercise | for testing one's own understanding might | Positive | 0.72 | 4.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | It was a good exercise, but there were some inconsistencies between the assignment rubric that was published and the grading key the students use to evaluate your work. More alignment between these two would be helpful. | It was a good | Exercise | but there were some inconsistencies between | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | It is not any technical 'lab based exercise bases I mean' | is not any technical 'lab based | Exercise | bases I mean' | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Boring course... useless videos... only the referential resources and exercises are good | . only the referential resources and | Exercise | are good | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | I found the course interesting though the continual music being played in the background was a distraction for me and felt like a brainwashing exercise. | me and felt like a brainwashing | Exercise | | Negative | 0.87 | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | This course is missing content but it is still very interesting to work on the exercises provided. | very interesting to work on the | Exercise | provided. | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Jeffrey Sachs is a great professor who talks in a very clear and concise way. The terminology and even the math parts are all really understandable. The exercises are really useful because they introduce you to a range of tools on the web such as World Bank data and the Human Development Index, AND teaches you how to use it. This course helps you to get a really well-rounded, complete picture of what Sustainable Development contains and looks at it from multiple perspectives. | parts are all really understandable. The | Exercise | are really useful because they introduce | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| u41Z-k3PEeWjfw5p9aPb_w | It was very challenging. It would be better if a couple of practice exercises were put after the relevant lecture videos and not just after the weekly lecture videos. | better if a couple of practice | Exercise | were put after the relevant lecture | Negative | 0.92 | 3.0 |
| uh_Pun3OEeW-FwqtbgSK1Q | The intro leads you into some really great games and programs. The main downside is that some of the coding projects seem like "fill in the blank" exercises rather than programming on your own. For a real beginner though its exciting getting those cool games out there. | like " fill in the blank" | Exercise | rather than programming on your own. | Negative | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| uiT8U5oIEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | The course content is very solid. It focuses heavily on the tools and technique, and there lacks the concepts and biology behind those tools. But I would guess there is some prior courses in this specialization explaining the concepts, though I didn't take them. The tools explained in this course is the most popular ones for handling up-stream analysis. They are the must-have ones for current bioinformatician jobs. The instructor, Dr Liliana Florea, did a great job, walking you through those tools step-by-step. I also found the exercises (exams) highly useful. The course title is not the most accurate one. The title is not very catchy either. This course is more about the tools for analyzing next generation sequence data. | tools step-by-step. I also found the | Exercise | (exams) highly useful. The course title | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | This course fills a gap that is rarely taught by explaining biological origins of musical experiences. The material is very easy to follow. I wish there were more practical exercises or home works to play with the concepts. | I wish there were more practical | Exercise | or home works to play with | Positive | 0.83 | 3.0 |
| UTmoThr5EeWqIgq-TOy4Xw | This course was fabulous. I was recently diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes, and the information that is available to the general public on this disease provides little, if any, factual information on what the disease is, how it is caused, and why certain treatments, such as diet and exercise, work. This course was taught at a level that was challenging but it gave me the information I have been looking for. The sections on treatment options will be particularly helpful for me as I discuss my situation with my doctor. | certain treatments, such as diet and | Exercise | work. This course was taught at | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| UTmoThr5EeWqIgq-TOy4Xw | great course enjoying it is one everyone should join to create awareness about Diabetes and the health benefits of regular exercise | and the health benefits of regular | Exercise | | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| UwQkL5z8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Great instructor, and the quizzes and exercises genuinely make you think a little bit. | Great instructor, and the quizzes and | Exercise | genuinely make you think a little | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | For an introductory course it is ok, however can't help get the feeling that the material is just skimmed through. In an effort to structure each session in the same way, detail has been missed out. Practical examples and hands-on exercises are very inadequate. Not impressed. | missed out. Practical examples and hands-on | Exercise | are very inadequate. Not impressed. | Positive | 0.87 | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The course is much too easy, to my mind. Some more practical exercises or more readings in fundamentals could be a nice addition. | to my mind. Some more practical | Exercise | or more readings in fundamentals could | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good! The examples provided in the course makes it unique and extremely valuable! The final exercise is great! | unique and extremely valuable! The final | Exercise | is great! | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This is a very good course.It covers all the aspects of negotiations.The professor delivering the lectures makes sure that the lectures are enjoyable.I had a great time listening to him and participating in the exercises. | to him and participating in the | Exercise | | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The entire course is a wonderful experience, including Prof. Siedel's little (or not so little) detours along the scenic route. I'm a Romanian and the talk about the University of Michigan was particularly eye opening – I had no idea these things were so huge! I'm an engineer by formation, so pretty much any course on negotiation would've taught me a great deal – but apart from the very real value I took out of this course, I genuinely enjoyed the way it was presented, and all of those little anecdotes really help anchor the various concepts along the way. The star of the course is of course the negotiation exercise at the end, which is an unforgettable experience. I'm not going to spoil it for you, but I do have a couple of recommendations. Do your best to follow the course in parallel with a friend you can get together with at the end of the course – you don't need to watch any of the modules together, just make sure you can get together face to face for the exercise. Assign the roles offline (don't assign them on the day of the exercise), and study your role thoroughly in private before the exercise. Be advised that your role is significantly more complex than "you have to sell a car for $10,000", so don't just allocate a few minutes before the negotiation to glance over the relevant dates and numbers; it won't be enough. And most importantly, don't cheat – you will most certainly cheat yourself (and not necessarily your partner) out of an amazing learning experience. Enjoy the course and have fun! | course is of course the negotiation | Exercise | at the end, which is an | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The entire course is a wonderful experience, including Prof. Siedel's little (or not so little) detours along the scenic route. I'm a Romanian and the talk about the University of Michigan was particularly eye opening – I had no idea these things were so huge! I'm an engineer by formation, so pretty much any course on negotiation would've taught me a great deal – but apart from the very real value I took out of this course, I genuinely enjoyed the way it was presented, and all of those little anecdotes really help anchor the various concepts along the way. The star of the course is of course the negotiation exercise at the end, which is an unforgettable experience. I'm not going to spoil it for you, but I do have a couple of recommendations. Do your best to follow the course in parallel with a friend you can get together with at the end of the course – you don't need to watch any of the modules together, just make sure you can get together face to face for the exercise. Assign the roles offline (don't assign them on the day of the exercise), and study your role thoroughly in private before the exercise. Be advised that your role is significantly more complex than "you have to sell a car for $10,000", so don't just allocate a few minutes before the negotiation to glance over the relevant dates and numbers; it won't be enough. And most importantly, don't cheat – you will most certainly cheat yourself (and not necessarily your partner) out of an amazing learning experience. Enjoy the course and have fun! | together face to face for the | Exercise | Assign the roles offline (don't assign | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The entire course is a wonderful experience, including Prof. Siedel's little (or not so little) detours along the scenic route. I'm a Romanian and the talk about the University of Michigan was particularly eye opening – I had no idea these things were so huge! I'm an engineer by formation, so pretty much any course on negotiation would've taught me a great deal – but apart from the very real value I took out of this course, I genuinely enjoyed the way it was presented, and all of those little anecdotes really help anchor the various concepts along the way. The star of the course is of course the negotiation exercise at the end, which is an unforgettable experience. I'm not going to spoil it for you, but I do have a couple of recommendations. Do your best to follow the course in parallel with a friend you can get together with at the end of the course – you don't need to watch any of the modules together, just make sure you can get together face to face for the exercise. Assign the roles offline (don't assign them on the day of the exercise), and study your role thoroughly in private before the exercise. Be advised that your role is significantly more complex than "you have to sell a car for $10,000", so don't just allocate a few minutes before the negotiation to glance over the relevant dates and numbers; it won't be enough. And most importantly, don't cheat – you will most certainly cheat yourself (and not necessarily your partner) out of an amazing learning experience. Enjoy the course and have fun! | them on the day of the | Exercise | and study your role thoroughly in | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The entire course is a wonderful experience, including Prof. Siedel's little (or not so little) detours along the scenic route. I'm a Romanian and the talk about the University of Michigan was particularly eye opening – I had no idea these things were so huge! I'm an engineer by formation, so pretty much any course on negotiation would've taught me a great deal – but apart from the very real value I took out of this course, I genuinely enjoyed the way it was presented, and all of those little anecdotes really help anchor the various concepts along the way. The star of the course is of course the negotiation exercise at the end, which is an unforgettable experience. I'm not going to spoil it for you, but I do have a couple of recommendations. Do your best to follow the course in parallel with a friend you can get together with at the end of the course – you don't need to watch any of the modules together, just make sure you can get together face to face for the exercise. Assign the roles offline (don't assign them on the day of the exercise), and study your role thoroughly in private before the exercise. Be advised that your role is significantly more complex than "you have to sell a car for $10,000", so don't just allocate a few minutes before the negotiation to glance over the relevant dates and numbers; it won't be enough. And most importantly, don't cheat – you will most certainly cheat yourself (and not necessarily your partner) out of an amazing learning experience. Enjoy the course and have fun! | role thoroughly in private before the | Exercise | Be advised that your role is | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent teacher and great content, perfectly fit for a self-study course, it would be even better if there were more exercises to practice. | even better if there were more | Exercise | to practice. | Negative | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I have not yet finished the course, as I am about to embark on the last homework exercise. However, up until now, the course has been extremely clear and well structured. The lesson material has been amazingly well structured. I recommend this to all. | to embark on the last homework | Exercise | However, up until now, the course | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I'm very grateful for this course. Lots of knowledge, entertaining videos and an intriguing negotiation exercise at the end. Thanks! | entertaining videos and an intriguing negotiation | Exercise | at the end. Thanks! | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The course is well taughted in a very organized and clear way. The last case exercise is really helpful! I really learned a lot. Great thanks to Gorge! | and clear way. The last case | Exercise | is really helpful! I really learned | Positive | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Interesting, focused on relevant matters, practical. Enriched with many examples and one involving practical exercise. I would have appreciated questions after each lesson block. | many examples and one involving practical | Exercise | I would have appreciated questions after | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great course! simple, straight to the point, and good exercises to learn | straight to the point, and good | Exercise | to learn | Negative | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | The course has a lot of interesting material, but I believe that a few points may be improved: 1) Exercises with Matlab are not programming ones (except for the PD controller). In my opinion, more detailed exercises (with a guide for solving them) would help to understand better the concepts behind the theory. For example, programming a rimless wheel or a SLIP template. 2) The course has a strong emphasis in theory. Some of the lectures were boring an difficult to follow. As I said before, a more practical approach would be more rewarding. 3) Quizzes were sometimes based on intuition, or topics outside of the course, rather than topics learned from the lessons. On the other side, the TAs were highly involved in the course. In addition, an extensive list of additional resources (books, papers) is a plus. I believe that the following sessions will be better than the first one! | few points may be improved: 1) | Exercise | with Matlab are not programming ones | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | The course has a lot of interesting material, but I believe that a few points may be improved: 1) Exercises with Matlab are not programming ones (except for the PD controller). In my opinion, more detailed exercises (with a guide for solving them) would help to understand better the concepts behind the theory. For example, programming a rimless wheel or a SLIP template. 2) The course has a strong emphasis in theory. Some of the lectures were boring an difficult to follow. As I said before, a more practical approach would be more rewarding. 3) Quizzes were sometimes based on intuition, or topics outside of the course, rather than topics learned from the lessons. On the other side, the TAs were highly involved in the course. In addition, an extensive list of additional resources (books, papers) is a plus. I believe that the following sessions will be better than the first one! | controller). In my opinion, more detailed | Exercise | (with a guide for solving them) | Positive | 0.83 | 2.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Great introduction to project and practical exercises. | Great introduction to project and practical | Exercise | | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Learned a lot! Very good information and the assignment was a fun and great exercise for implementing the things learned. | assignment was a fun and great | Exercise | for implementing the things learned. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good intro course, i just wish it had more drilling exercises in CSS. | just wish it had more drilling | Exercise | in CSS. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It is ok. More practice exercises ... | It is ok. More practice | Exercise | . . . | Negative | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | This course is a good start if you already have a little experience with CSS. As a neophyte, I found that there was too much material for the amount of presentation time. I needed many more examples and exercises. I felt dejected each time the instructor said not to worry about getting it right and just experiment -- that's easy to say if you aren't being graded. The fact is that the material is extensive and often complicated, and it's imperative for me, as a student, to be correct as fast as possible. The result is that my grade (A) does not reflect my comprehension of the material. I managed to commit the material presented to short term memory so that I could pass the course, but as always happens when someone crams, the information is gone from my head. | I needed many more examples and | Exercise | I felt dejected each time the | Positive | 0.84 | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | A well paced and clearly presented introduction to css. This course lays out the basic principles of css through a set of practical examples and exercises. | a set of practical examples and | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Colleen van Lent is really great, the course is well put together, and the video quality was excellent (looking at other courses, I now see that this is not always the case). I went through the HTML5 and CSS3 course and found them to be well-structured and thorough. There was a lot of opportunity to put into practice the skills we were learning and lots of helpful resources to point students in the right direction for additional help. I didn't like peer reviewing at first, but it was actually a useful exercise. I realized that other people may come at a problem in a slightly different way, and looking at their code helped me gain some insight into that nuance. Thanks, Colleen! | but it was actually a useful | Exercise | I realized that other people may | Negative | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| VIUTXB0IEea20BJooCBlFw | I do not want to rate this course at this stage but I would like to make the following comment in relation to the course resources and in particular the answers to the exercises in the optional text book. For students who do not have a copy of the text book, providing answers to questions from the text book without showing the actual questions is not very useful and to be quite frank, ridiculous. I would like to think that the course designers would take some sort of appropriate action to remedy this. How exactly this would be done is up to the course designers but I would suggest that another downloadable PDF document showing all the questions would be extremely useful and necessary. I look forward to a response. Regards, Trevor Farley | in particular the answers to the | Exercise | in the optional text book. For | Positive | 0.83 | 1.0 |
| Vrih-AYnEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | From the Systems Biology specialization courses, this is the one from where I have learned the most, in some way the reason is because I didn't know most of Network Analysis, but now I feel familiarized with it. I consider this is one of the most extended courses, and could be improved in the practice evaluation with more exercises. | in the practice evaluation with more | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | A useful course that gives practical guidelines on increasing physical activity in daily life. It specifies that even as low as 30 minutes of moderate physical exercise 5 times a day can be very beneficial to an otherwise sedentary person. | as 30 minutes of moderate physical | Exercise | 5 times a day can be | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | There was nothing in the course that I didn't already know, but I'm no longer young & I didn't expect there to be. I wasn't wild about sitting through lectures about being active while pregnant or making sure my kids exercise. For me, that's a waste of time. I know what I need to be doing & I was hoping the course would inspire me to do it. Unfortunately, it did not. I got tired of hearing about walking or bicycling to work as the main way to get active. I am now retired, but even when I worked that was never an option. | pregnant or making sure my kids | Exercise | For me, that's a waste of | Negative | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Wayne comes across as very enthusiastic and likable. The course material is interesting. It does feel like the course if artificially stretched out a bit too long, though. The material and exercises seem to get repetitive after week 3, when the pattern has been established to sum up all forces, and then to sum up all cross-products. Nevertheless, this is an introductory course, so too much depth can not be expected. As an introduction, it was a great experience. | too long, though. The material and | Exercise | seem to get repetitive after week | Negative | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Well-paced course with good accompanying exercises. | Well-paced course with good accompanying | Exercise | | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Hard work but very well explained, lots of exercises and good content from a great university. | but very well explained, lots of | Exercise | and good content from a great | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course, even better if the homework exercises would be provided with the possibility to check your own answers. | course, even better if the homework | Exercise | would be provided with the possibility | Negative | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This course was excellent and a great introduction to Meteor. It does go really fast, and should be supplemented with additional exercises from the Meteor website and other resources. | and should be supplemented with additional | Exercise | from the Meteor website and other | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Lack of exercises and communication. | Lack of | Exercise | and communication. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent introduction to Meteor. The videos were engaging and the exercises were helpful and based on real-world tasks. | The videos were engaging and the | Exercise | were helpful and based on real-world | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | The introspection exercises open our mind to talk about personal and private topics, like strengths and weakness, with unknown people. | The introspection | Exercise | open our mind to talk about | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Amazing course. The teacher is excellent, the videos are entertaining and the exercises proposed are really interesting | the videos are entertaining and the | Exercise | proposed are really interesting | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Underwhelmed. If this had been a free course I might have gone up to two stars, but I probably wouldn't have finished. This course attempts to take complex social awareness and patterns and reduce them to an understandable set of skills to be practiced... but it fails. I find it to be full of new-age dreamy ramblings that do not really help in the real world. Leadership is influence, which comes as a mixture of experience and intention. This course seems to discount experience in favour of "sense", used in this context as a poorly-translated summing up of the physical senses and their analysis. This course requires you to create an intimate written self-portrait, which you then find yourself sharing with a stranger and comparing. The exercise is interesting, and a lot of students have bought into the premise that this is a "genuine conversation" and allows them to explore their ability to know another person. I am the heretic in the room: I think the student wish to appear intelligent to their peers and the emperor is in fact shamefully unclad. If this is what the world considers a "genuine" conversation then the world is a shallower place than I had thought. This course, unfortunately, over-promises and under-delivers, and I am not in the least tempted to take the next one in the series. A good concept, but poorly planned, poorly translated, and poorly executed. Valerie clearly understands her topic but the summarizing of it for this framework is not a success. | with a stranger and comparing. The | Exercise | is interesting, and a lot of | Positive | 0.68 | 1.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | This has been a great learning experience for me, I developed an appropriate routing was the exercise of a conscious leadership, where I have raised awareness of the connection with people to establish meaningful communication . Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity , thank you . | developed an appropriate routing was the | Exercise | of a conscious leadership, where I | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | this course really helped me develop my leadership in a unique way ,it pushes you to engage with your friends and surroundings on different and effective exercises , it also clears some of the misconceptions that you might have had about leadership and about how your brain reacts to different things | and surroundings on different and effective | Exercise | , it also clears some of | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | "Learning about the SR helped me a lot to improve my leadership skills such as my self-awareness, observation and listening. And I really enjoyed doing the practical and journal exercises, merci Mme Valerie." | enjoyed doing the practical and journal | Exercise | merci Mme Valerie. " | Positive | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | I greatly enjoyed the course. Valerie is very intriguing person. I enjoyed listening to her and doing all the exercises. I was nervous about the self portrait at first. In the end it was a wonderful exercise to look into yourself. I also enjoyed the conversation as I met a lovely lady called Ruth. Thank you to HEC and savior-relier team! | to her and doing all the | Exercise | I was nervous about the self | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | I greatly enjoyed the course. Valerie is very intriguing person. I enjoyed listening to her and doing all the exercises. I was nervous about the self portrait at first. In the end it was a wonderful exercise to look into yourself. I also enjoyed the conversation as I met a lovely lady called Ruth. Thank you to HEC and savior-relier team! | the end it was a wonderful | Exercise | to look into yourself. I also | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Good points: 1) Great instructor; 2) applicable content; 3) great for physics students. Bad points: 1) Lacking of a "Formulae booklet" to use as reminder and reference for formulas and constants - when working on the models for this course; 2) The exercises approach should be reviews, making more use of the tools available in the Coursera interface (example: Assigments in text format (discursive) should use the own coursera interface, instead make us upload .TXT or .DOC files). Extra: I did not finish the course, the format and content do not achieve my personal objectives, as a software developer and environmentalist. But i really enjoyed the general approach and goal. | models for this course; 2) The | Exercise | approach should be reviews, making more | Negative | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| Wp6z-dymEeWUwhJ351EtdQ | Very good content. Subject wheel explained and good practical exercises. | Subject wheel explained and good practical | Exercise | | Negative | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| X3F5IHK0EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | In my opinion, this course was way too theoretical. I wish we had more examples and practical exercises. After four courses in a row I was expecting much more skills rather than theoretical discussions all the way long. | we had more examples and practical | Exercise | After four courses in a row | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Very good content, instructors, materials and exercise. I give 5 stars with a small remark: Some technical issues, grading and recognition enhancements, would leave this course even better. | Very good content, instructors, materials and | Exercise | I give 5 stars with a | Positive | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Very well explained, at least from Google search engine sight and practical exercise. | Google search engine sight and practical | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Nice course, would be nice to have more exercises and more elaborated, but fair enough! | would be nice to have more | Exercise | and more elaborated, but fair enough! | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| xtpKLngcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I am just about to start week three. I am enjoting the close reading exercises, the tutorials are informative and the conversations are very illuminating. Very well set out. | I am enjoting the close reading | Exercise | the tutorials are informative and the | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| xtpKLngcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | It is a very interesting course, but I think it is difficult to understand if somebody is not English speaker. However, I recommend this course to everybody who likes writing and wants to know more about style and text editing. The teacher is excellent, his explanations are clear. The exercises are funny and I could learn from them. | excellent, his explanations are clear. The | Exercise | are funny and I could learn | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| xtpKLngcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This course helped me in my writing. I enjoyed the feedback and the exercises. | I enjoyed the feedback and the | Exercise | | Positive | 0.98 | 4.0 |
| xtpKLngcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Great class for the content I needed. I audited this class and benefited from the theory discussion and practical exercises. The class guided me to improve my writing style which was my ultimate goal. | from the theory discussion and practical | Exercise | The class guided me to improve | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | While this course has great content, it lacks interactivity, exercises, peer learning opportunities and leaves desiring more real-life use cases and examples. | has great content, it lacks interactivity, | Exercise | peer learning opportunities and leaves desiring | Positive | 0.79 | 3.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Fenomenal course, you learn all the basics of organic solar cells in great detail, you have extra material to read, tutorials, and live sessions. I think it should have more exercises or peer reviewed assignments so that you can explain processes and get parameters of the cell. | I think it should have more | Exercise | or peer reviewed assignments so that | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Fantastic course! Learned a lot from it - both theoretically and practically. The hands on exercises were very smart and applicable. I'm left with a lot more interest in the subject, a bunch of books for ruther reading and some new tools under my belt. Thanks! | theoretically and practically. The hands on | Exercise | were very smart and applicable. I'm | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well done! I liked that the exercises provided less and less instruction but were definitely do-able with a little research, just like real life. Highly recommend! | Well done! I liked that the | Exercise | provided less and less instruction but | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very nice tutorial for starters. Includes all the necessary documentation needed and the exercises are very well planned such that they cover all the concepts. Highly engaging tutor. Strongly recommend! | the necessary documentation needed and the | Exercise | are very well planned such that | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course, i liked the exercises. It is well explained, but you also need to learn/read from other sites (what is linked as resource), to be able to do the weekly tasks. I liked this approach, the teacher is explaining the lectures well. | Good course, i liked the | Exercise | It is well explained, but you | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent for absolute beginners! But, if you have good experience in CSS & JavaScript you might play it at 1.5X, it is too informative to be attended by someone who knows even a little, it might be boring, then. Generally, the course is very informative, rich, instructions based and have very good exercises covering all the course content with a good-as-a-start hands on experience. | instructions based and have very good | Exercise | covering all the course content with | Positive | 0.83 | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Found all the lessons very well explained. The exercises were clear and helped a lot to put all in action. The shared PDF's are a good guide. About the videos It seems to me a challenge to put many concepts in short ones, less than 10min of duration. I am very satisfied, even some videos could be considered too long. ;-) | the lessons very well explained. The | Exercise | were clear and helped a lot | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very well explained! Details hand on exercises that help a lot understanding the subjects | Very well explained! Details hand on | Exercise | that help a lot understanding the | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | nice course, nice way of teaching by giving the assigments after the practice on exercises. | the assigments after the practice on | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The student is carefully led into the vast language of Front-End coding with easy-to-follow videos and exercise instructions. | Front-End coding with easy-to-follow videos and | Exercise | instructions. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Love it so far. The lesson exercises make everything easy to learn and not boring. | Love it so far. The lesson | Exercise | make everything easy to learn and | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I think the classes and the exercises could be far more dynamic and didactic, but besides of that is a good course to get a grip of Bootstrap if you follow along writing the code and if you tinker a little by yourself afterwards. But it's definitely for people with solid JS and CSS bases. | I think the classes and the | Exercise | could be far more dynamic and | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course for people who start creating web application. Great exercises and assignments. Thank you very much. | who start creating web application. Great | Exercise | and assignments. Thank you very much. | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Wonderful course, well designed content, exercise and assignment. Only that difficulties of the assignment could be improved so as to ensure bette learning. We want more challenge! lol | Wonderful course, well designed content, | Exercise | and assignment. Only that difficulties of | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Clear explanations, exercises are very detailed and contain sufficient complexity to make them useful. | Clear explanations, | Exercise | are very detailed and contain sufficient | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | 老师讲的很好，就是有些拖沓。实验部分希望老师在最后可以给出源码。 A good course, good teacher, except that sometimes the teacher is kind of slow. And I do really hope that teacher could give us the final codes right after every exercise. | the final codes right after every | Exercise | | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The topic is overall well covered. The material are not easy to go through and do not reference well key knowledge area, specifically: how to apply them. The exercises and the assignments could be largely improved: the targets and the guidance are not always clear. Adding up on the same files instead having one file per exercice / one learning key point does not help. | specifically: how to apply them. The | Exercise | and the assignments could be largely | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course gave me the fundamentals to start with the development of responsive web sites. The learning process is well supported with some exercises for each reviewed topic. | process is well supported with some | Exercise | for each reviewed topic. | Positive | 0.97 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Thorough introduction into Bootstrap. I especially liked the hands-on exercises! | Bootstrap. I especially liked the hands-on | Exercise | | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A informative class with a great instructor. Teaching is mostly through videos but their are exercises each day as well, which I appreciate (I'm a hands on kind of learner). The assignments at the end of the week are challenging in that they usually ask you to learn something from a 3rd part website or take what you know and combine it in ways he hasn't shown you. While that might be difficult for some I find it refreshing. By the end I feel that I know the breadth of bootstrap and have decent skills to implement basic websites with it. | mostly through videos but their are | Exercise | each day as well, which I | Positive | 0.94 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The lecture is well organized, slides are very clear and easy to follow. After each class, there is a clear instruction on exercises available both in PDF format and video format, which is very helpful for beginner like me. | there is a clear instruction on | Exercise | available both in PDF format and | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well presented course, with carefully thought out exercises and assignments that all worked together to reinforce the material. The videos explaining the assignments helped to clarify the requirements, and Jogesh Muppala's sense of humour makes the lectures a pleasure to watch. | presented course, with carefully thought out | Exercise | and assignments that all worked together | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The tutor is doing great describing everything in a short, tight format. I had a great time understanding Bootstrap. It would be great if we had more exercises. A separate project, mirroring the one from the lectures and exercises. | be great if we had more | Exercise | A separate project, mirroring the one | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The tutor is doing great describing everything in a short, tight format. I had a great time understanding Bootstrap. It would be great if we had more exercises. A separate project, mirroring the one from the lectures and exercises. | the one from the lectures and | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Fairly disappointing compared to the first week of this course. The balance of instruction to exercise was very low. I also resent being sent to raw Bootstrap documentation; if I could have read that, I likely wouldn't be taking the course. It makes it frustrating to jump into the exercises when the course had 5-7 minutes of lectures, 15 minutes on the exercise and then an assignment on something new. Update: I'm also impressed by Mr. Muppala taking feedback like a boss and blaming students for low reviews. | course. The balance of instruction to | Exercise | was very low. I also resent | Positive | 0.99 | 2.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Fairly disappointing compared to the first week of this course. The balance of instruction to exercise was very low. I also resent being sent to raw Bootstrap documentation; if I could have read that, I likely wouldn't be taking the course. It makes it frustrating to jump into the exercises when the course had 5-7 minutes of lectures, 15 minutes on the exercise and then an assignment on something new. Update: I'm also impressed by Mr. Muppala taking feedback like a boss and blaming students for low reviews. | it frustrating to jump into the | Exercise | when the course had 5-7 minutes | Negative | 0.68 | 2.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Fairly disappointing compared to the first week of this course. The balance of instruction to exercise was very low. I also resent being sent to raw Bootstrap documentation; if I could have read that, I likely wouldn't be taking the course. It makes it frustrating to jump into the exercises when the course had 5-7 minutes of lectures, 15 minutes on the exercise and then an assignment on something new. Update: I'm also impressed by Mr. Muppala taking feedback like a boss and blaming students for low reviews. | of lectures, 15 minutes on the | Exercise | and then an assignment on something | Negative | 0.99 | 2.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It was a nice time to do all these exercises and watch videos with all steps to complete the task | nice time to do all these | Exercise | and watch videos with all steps | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course and instructor. I just wish the Angular course had an option to do the exercises without purchasing the course. | had an option to do the | Exercise | without purchasing the course. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I like how every week there is an exercise that makes all the difference when it comes to understanding concepts that have been taught | how every week there is an | Exercise | that makes all the difference when | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a great course for anyone looking to take their knowledge of basic web design to a new level. I found bootstrap a little intimidating at first but this course does a great job of teaching and explaining it at a great pace. If you're new to web development and tired of making websites that look like they're from the 90s, bootstrap is a great tool to get your websites to look modern and professional. The instructor is very knowledgeable and explains things thoroughly (he's also very funny!). I recommend incorporating the additional learning materials as they will help you understand the concepts discussed in the lectures on a much deeper level. Lastly, be sure to do every exercise as they are essential to completing the assignments. Have fun! | Lastly, be sure to do every | Exercise | as they are essential to completing | Positive | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is pretty well structured and the exercises were explained pretty well. It was pretty easy to follow the steps and do the assignments, but sometimes required a little bit more explanation on what does what, and why sometimes even after following his steps, our website might not look similar to what he has done on the exercise. One thing also if possible I'm not sure if carousel is pronounced ka-ruu-sel in Hong Kong, but it's Char-uh-sel like the ride, which to me was quite annoying to listen to. | is pretty well structured and the | Exercise | were explained pretty well. It was | Negative | 0.81 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is pretty well structured and the exercises were explained pretty well. It was pretty easy to follow the steps and do the assignments, but sometimes required a little bit more explanation on what does what, and why sometimes even after following his steps, our website might not look similar to what he has done on the exercise. One thing also if possible I'm not sure if carousel is pronounced ka-ruu-sel in Hong Kong, but it's Char-uh-sel like the ride, which to me was quite annoying to listen to. | what he has done on the | Exercise | One thing also if possible I'm | Positive | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Even if I have worked with Bootstrap before, I found this course very useful to review and deepen my skills. The lessons and exercises are very clearly explained. The course is easy to follow and very enjoyable. I took this course as part of the Full Stack Web Development Specialization. | deepen my skills. The lessons and | Exercise | are very clearly explained. The course | Negative | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good teacher with a complete material , excellent examples and exercises . Congratulations !! | complete material , excellent examples and | Exercise | . Congratulations ! ! | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a good course. Even though the exercises are not graded, they are important. | a good course. Even though the | Exercise | are not graded, they are important. | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very detailed and informative course with lots of hands-on exercises. | informative course with lots of hands-on | Exercise | | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course was very well-designed and prepared. The professor has a great way to present the material in a thorough, methodic manner. Lots of attention is given to practical exercises which are easy to follow and greatly help in digesting large amounts of material that the professor presents. | of attention is given to practical | Exercise | which are easy to follow and | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course that slowly builds up a web site with exercises and assignments. Instructor has good sense of humor which makes the lectures interesting and fun. | builds up a web site with | Exercise | and assignments. Instructor has good sense | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great intro course that fully dives into Bootstrap and all it's capabilities. The site that you build in this course can actually be a decent addition to any portfolio for a new web designer too. I would have given it a 5/5, but I thought the course moved too slowly and rushed over explaining the available JavaScript and jQuery plugins that Bootstrap has to offer. The plugins are quite useful not just within Bootstrap, and they can be installed and customized for a range of web projects. Expect to dedicate at least 3-4 hours a week just completing the module lectures and exercises along with the homework assignment. This is not out of the ordinary though, Bootstrap does have a lot of components to cover. I truly believe Professor Muppala is the best person to do it as well. I appreciated his input in the discussion forums and thorough instruction. | just completing the module lectures and | Exercise | along with the homework assignment. This | Positive | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great explanations and exercises. | Great explanations and | Exercise | | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course. From my experience in Coursera, it is perfect presentation. Only one thing. Instead of inserting block of code, during exercise, better when instructor is typing the code. So, it comes to better realize for a student, feeling where he is, at the point. | of inserting block of code, during | Exercise | better when instructor is typing the | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great intro for Bootstrap with appropriate exercises. Very informative and will never go back to vanilla HTML! | Great intro for Bootstrap with appropriate | Exercise | Very informative and will never go | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | An excellent course about bootstrap with excellent content videos and exercises | bootstrap with excellent content videos and | Exercise | | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good course, content are a little bit too much in 4 weeks study. Exercises and assignment are easy. | too much in 4 weeks study. | Exercise | and assignment are easy. | Negative | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course. exercise and assignment are carefully designed to reiterate the concept. Practical tools are like LESS/SASS are covered. The approach to have students help grade each other homework is very good. | Great course. | Exercise | and assignment are carefully designed to | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I really like this course. It provides a wide aspect of bootstrap and good exercise. Learned a lot from this course. | wide aspect of bootstrap and good | Exercise | Learned a lot from this course. | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Although the course structure and information is great, the course exercise and grading organization has a lot of space for improvement. Current structure doesn't make it possible for the learner to determine the speed. All the parts are equally important. You have to carefully go through hours of instructions. Each week and the assignment builds on what you have done before, but there are no checkpoints where you can verify your code matches the actual expectations. This causes a lot of confusion. Peer evaluation rules are not shown before you submit your work. After submitting my work, I discovered that there are requirements that were not in the assignment. | and information is great, the course | Exercise | and grading organization has a lot | Positive | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Professor, I truly enjoyed your course. The exercises were very clear and you are an amazing teacher! Thanks so much! | I truly enjoyed your course. The | Exercise | were very clear and you are | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good content, lots of exercises to get familiar, very good professor. | Very good content, lots of | Exercise | to get familiar, very good professor. | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is AMAZING! It was the BEST course I've ever taken in Coursera. Prof. Muppala is great, his lectures cover everything you need, so you do not feel lost at all although you learn pretty advanced stuff.. Course material is well-organized, and exercises go great with assignments. In short, this course is not like other introductory courses that just teach simple things or syntax. I really felt that I learned some stuff that I can actually use for my own projects. | . Course material is well-organized, and | Exercise | go great with assignments. In short, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| yE4SeOsyEeWaMA7Pe7xMzw | Main issues I encountered in the course: - many videos end with a suggestion to "refer to the suggested materials for more information". Which are these materials, and where can they be found? - the slides could use some diagrams here and there, as the constant text screens are monotonous and make understanding harder in some cases - the course does not settle on a balance between breadth and depth of information. Some aspects are presented at a very high level, yet using very specialised terminology and concepts. For instance, context switching when describing the disadvantages of microkernels, or pre-emptively scheduled systems - I have a CS background and had no problem with these aspects, but I am aware I am highly subjective. It's a case of "chicken and egg", where if you understand the low level concepts you probably don't need the course, and if you don't understand them you also can't understand the high level concepts. - At the end of the Week 3 videos describing the three OSs, it is said "In order to know the details on how to write a program and run applications in Riot/Contiki/TinyOS, please come back to our lectures who have more detailed videos." Which lectures are these, and where can they be found? - the only practical exercises in the course (Week 4) are only vaguely related to the course's targets ----- All this being said, it is an ok introduction to the embedded OS world, if you bring your own CS and OS background knowledge. | be found? - the only practical | Exercise | in the course (Week 4) are | Negative | 0.85 | 2.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | May seem a little bit dull, but the theory is worth understanding. Swirl exercises are 100% copies of lectures => sometimes it's not so interesting to complete them. | the theory is worth understanding. Swirl | Exercise | are 100% copies of lectures => | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Materials were easily understandable, and the difficulty curve wasn't so unexpected as in other courses. Maybe some more insight into multiple testing (exercise examples) or bootstrapping would have been great. Though, there are some minor errors that have to be considered, such as the lecture 09-03 (T-tests) is included in the 09-04 lecture (Two group testing). Those 7 minutes appear repeated in both cases. | some more insight into multiple testing | Exercise | examples) or bootstrapping would have been | Negative | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Steep Learning Curve. Swirl exercises are important for this course | Steep Learning Curve. Swirl | Exercise | are important for this course | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Even as a mathematician I found it super useful to participate this class. I have learned similar material in an undergrad course, but I forgot most of it. In fact this course is so much better than the undergrad course I took, because quizzes and the project help me to learn the material by practical exercises. I am really thankful for the Data Science team for this course and all the Data Science Specialization! | to learn the material by practical | Exercise | I am really thankful for the | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Tree exercise had absolutely no relevant video material. Videos give zero context for why data structures are important or when they are used....Should take a lesson from the Stanford course. | Tree | Exercise | had absolutely no relevant video material. | Negative | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great content followed up with good programming exercises. Please keep up the good work! | content followed up with good programming | Exercise | Please keep up the good work! | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Oh my God! What a priceless gift to have one of the greatest living jazz musicians lay out, with pristine clarity and with great exercises, the exact skills and knowledge one needs to play jazz at a pro level. Bravo! | with pristine clarity and with great | Exercise | the exact skills and knowledge one | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Good course for a free one. Thank you for all of your great work. Somehow, the pace is too fast. Covering about 2 sections per week is by far too hard to read the book along with the class. There's no practice exercise to strengthen what you learn. The assignment is very hard and sometime don't directly implement the knowledge you learn in that week. Sometime the video sound is too quiet (but you can read the transcript when it happened.) The book is better in my opinion. | with the class. There's no practice | Exercise | to strengthen what you learn. The | Negative | 0.85 | 3.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Great look to the integration problems, drawing and theoretical exercises was not as good. | the integration problems, drawing and theoretical | Exercise | was not as good. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Excellent course. Very logical sequence of presentation, accompanied by well designed exercises. | of presentation, accompanied by well designed | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | great course with hands on practice of the concepts. Getting the tools installed is a little frustrating but once you get past that part there are a lot of good exercises to apply what you are learning. | there are a lot of good | Exercise | to apply what you are learning. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Hello, Thank you for this well structured course. Exercises and tutorials are very useful to complement lectures and help increase our skills in the domain. Tools deployment and connection (Oracle database on Virtual box and pentaho data integration) was a nightmare. It would be great if you package all the tools needed for a given course into a predefined virtual machine image ready to be downloaded from the course. Kind Regards, Mouhammad Moustafa | you for this well structured course. | Exercise | and tutorials are very useful to | Positive | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Excellent course. Very logical sequence of presentation, accompanied by well designed exercises. | of presentation, accompanied by well designed | Exercise | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Metrics produced a great opportunity to use exercises creating the software metric artifacts, as was done so well in course #4. This would be a significant improvement, and the lack of it was the only reason this didn't get five stars. | produced a great opportunity to use | Exercise | creating the software metric artifacts, as | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Maybe it would be better to add more exercises to assimilate better the content. Same as previous courses in the Specialization. | would be better to add more | Exercise | to assimilate better the content. Same | Negative | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | I feel it very similar to the first course. Yes, you make a bigger game, it's more complex, we review more script stuff, and the project is more challenging. However, I feel that it's mainly about joining the pieces together, and following the instructions from the videos. I would like to see more exercises where there is the need to do stuff by yourself. Example: add the code to Sparty script to enable double jump. Then, after we complete the assignment, show us the correct result, so that we also practice scripting, and do the rest of the course with the right script. Also, I think it would be good to add a small course related to the artist's work, just as there is for the designer (Principles of Game Design) and the programmer (this course), but that's outside of the scope of this review. | I would like to see more | Exercise | where there is the need to | Positive | 0.84 | 4.0 |
| Zba0dJLREeSb9SIACzCJlg | This MOOC has taught me new ways to approach violin teaching, especially with younger kids. It showed the basic principles as well as different skills and techniques that are essential/ important in teaching and playing. It gave a wide variety of fun exercises for students. This course gave me new insight in violin teaching that I can confidently apply with my students. | gave a wide variety of fun | Exercise | for students. This course gave me | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| zHCX4hJgEeaX4g6xdats6w | Great course. The reason I did not give it five stars because I thought the last week of the course was not up to par with the first 4 weeks. The lessons on Giraph and GraphX were confusing in my opinion and the hands on exercise did not really clear things up for me. Otherwise, a great course. | my opinion and the hands on | Exercise | did not really clear things up | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The content of this course is very good to cover some greatest thinkers in human history. It is important to know them and their thoughts to understand the society and oneself. One thing could be improved is the exercises. They're repeative and fail to inspire me. | thing could be improved is the | Exercise | They're repeative and fail to inspire | Negative | 0.93 | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | great intro class to statistics. Love the animation, teaching style and R lab exercises. The first class in coursera that video content and quiz are relevant. Highly recommended!!! | animation, teaching style and R lab | Exercise | The first class in coursera that | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I really liked the course, it was relatively easy to understand and enjoyable, and specially the lessons taught by Matthijs, he was just amazing at making it all very understandable and enjoyable. And overall, I just really feel some exercises along the way for each topic would have been of great help. | overall, I just really feel some | Exercise | along the way for each topic | Positive | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The cartoons and animations used in this course really make statistics a lot easier and interesting. However few modules especially the later part of probability do not explain the concepts thoroughly. However, this is a great place to start! Also, the addition of R exercises are a great idea | start! Also, the addition of R | Exercise | are a great idea | Negative | 0.66 | 3.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I've always had a rough time with mathematics, but the way this course is structured makes it easy for me to go at my own pace, re-watch videos that were confusing the first time through and work through problems until I really felt like I understand how the formulas work. The consistent use of exercises in R were extremely useful as well. I'd highly recommend this course and learning system for people like me, who never thought they'd be able to grasp mathematics. | formulas work. The consistent use of | Exercise | in R were extremely useful as | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very dynamic and enjoyable class, great instructors and combination of theory and hands-on exercises. | and combination of theory and hands-on | Exercise | | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A difficult subject made easy and interesting. I wish there more exercise to practise home in order to master the concepts. | and interesting. I wish there more | Exercise | to practise home in order to | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This was very demanding course for me. However, at the end that is the only way one can learn things properly. Video lessons are interesting as well as exercises, and the tools and workflows that have been shown to us have been very clearly explained and demonstrated. I hope I will be able to continue with next course in a row and finally finish Capstone Project and earn the Certificate. | lessons are interesting as well as | Exercise | and the tools and workflows that | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Thanks very much for the course! I really liked the optional exercise because they guide me to what to do on real life about what to do, and how to do it. Really loved your teachings. The only thing I would like to say I didn't like was the images behind you, I really enjoy people on real life background, maybe you should just seat at the coffee shop of your university or at an open area. Those photos are good, but I just think the scenario of the university or any other real would be more eye catching. | course! I really liked the optional | Exercise | because they guide me to what | Positive | 0.89 | 4.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a very nice course. The exercises selected were fun to work with and quite interesting. The lectures were quite clear and the material was well-elaborated. The assignments are quite interesting and fun to work with. | It's a very nice course. The | Exercise | selected were fun to work with | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course has very interesting programming examples and the exercises are really challenging. The philosophy of this course is to teach through example problems by explaining and solving them. The exercises are very well designed and reinforce the concepts very well. But, the later exercises might be a bit hard for an absolute beginner. Nevertheless, once you can successfully solve an exercise set, you can be sure that you have mastered the related concepts. By the way, this course uses many custom libraries which actually help in writing interesting programs to solve real life problems. The course resource page with detailed documentations is really helpful. Personally, I enjoyed the course. If you have some basic programming skills and want to solve interesting problems, you should give this course a try. | very interesting programming examples and the | Exercise | are really challenging. The philosophy of | Positive | 0.77 | 3.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course has very interesting programming examples and the exercises are really challenging. The philosophy of this course is to teach through example problems by explaining and solving them. The exercises are very well designed and reinforce the concepts very well. But, the later exercises might be a bit hard for an absolute beginner. Nevertheless, once you can successfully solve an exercise set, you can be sure that you have mastered the related concepts. By the way, this course uses many custom libraries which actually help in writing interesting programs to solve real life problems. The course resource page with detailed documentations is really helpful. Personally, I enjoyed the course. If you have some basic programming skills and want to solve interesting problems, you should give this course a try. | by explaining and solving them. The | Exercise | are very well designed and reinforce | Positive | 0.99 | 3.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course has very interesting programming examples and the exercises are really challenging. The philosophy of this course is to teach through example problems by explaining and solving them. The exercises are very well designed and reinforce the concepts very well. But, the later exercises might be a bit hard for an absolute beginner. Nevertheless, once you can successfully solve an exercise set, you can be sure that you have mastered the related concepts. By the way, this course uses many custom libraries which actually help in writing interesting programs to solve real life problems. The course resource page with detailed documentations is really helpful. Personally, I enjoyed the course. If you have some basic programming skills and want to solve interesting problems, you should give this course a try. | concepts very well. But, the later | Exercise | might be a bit hard for | Positive | 0.95 | 3.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course has very interesting programming examples and the exercises are really challenging. The philosophy of this course is to teach through example problems by explaining and solving them. The exercises are very well designed and reinforce the concepts very well. But, the later exercises might be a bit hard for an absolute beginner. Nevertheless, once you can successfully solve an exercise set, you can be sure that you have mastered the related concepts. By the way, this course uses many custom libraries which actually help in writing interesting programs to solve real life problems. The course resource page with detailed documentations is really helpful. Personally, I enjoyed the course. If you have some basic programming skills and want to solve interesting problems, you should give this course a try. | once you can successfully solve an | Exercise | set, you can be sure that | Positive | 0.76 | 3.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The programming exercises are very good to reinforce the concepts learnt in the video lectures. The guide lines in the programming exercise are very clear and helpful making the problems not that hard to deal with and yet very enjoyable. | The programming | Exercise | are very good to reinforce the | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The programming exercises are very good to reinforce the concepts learnt in the video lectures. The guide lines in the programming exercise are very clear and helpful making the problems not that hard to deal with and yet very enjoyable. | The guide lines in the programming | Exercise | are very clear and helpful making | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a good Java Tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBWX97e1E9g&list=PLE7E8B7F4856C9B19 I followed two videos and I'm learning in my way. I left the course because the ammount of time required was too high. For example, for one part of an exercise I spent a total of 12 hours distributed in 3 days. For the other part of the exercise I spent 1 hour. Also, in the part one, the last exercise was tremendouly difficult for begginers and for someone (my case) that know one language. You are making people hate Java. This is not for begginers. I have to say that the part of codepen and HTML was great. Fortunatelly, I didn't pay. But I think that paying for this course is a waste of money. I had a good experience in other Coursera programming course: "An Introduction to Interactive Programming in Python" of Rice Unviersity. The examples were awesome and the tests were reasonable, quite the opposite to this course. Also, Eclipse is so much better than BlueJ in many ways, also into learning... And there's more things that must be improved, but no time and no money. I'm very dissapointed to this course and Duke Univeristy. | example, for one part of an | Exercise | I spent a total of 12 | Negative | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a good Java Tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBWX97e1E9g&list=PLE7E8B7F4856C9B19 I followed two videos and I'm learning in my way. I left the course because the ammount of time required was too high. For example, for one part of an exercise I spent a total of 12 hours distributed in 3 days. For the other part of the exercise I spent 1 hour. Also, in the part one, the last exercise was tremendouly difficult for begginers and for someone (my case) that know one language. You are making people hate Java. This is not for begginers. I have to say that the part of codepen and HTML was great. Fortunatelly, I didn't pay. But I think that paying for this course is a waste of money. I had a good experience in other Coursera programming course: "An Introduction to Interactive Programming in Python" of Rice Unviersity. The examples were awesome and the tests were reasonable, quite the opposite to this course. Also, Eclipse is so much better than BlueJ in many ways, also into learning... And there's more things that must be improved, but no time and no money. I'm very dissapointed to this course and Duke Univeristy. | For the other part of the | Exercise | I spent 1 hour. Also, in | Negative | 0.96 | 1.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a good Java Tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBWX97e1E9g&list=PLE7E8B7F4856C9B19 I followed two videos and I'm learning in my way. I left the course because the ammount of time required was too high. For example, for one part of an exercise I spent a total of 12 hours distributed in 3 days. For the other part of the exercise I spent 1 hour. Also, in the part one, the last exercise was tremendouly difficult for begginers and for someone (my case) that know one language. You are making people hate Java. This is not for begginers. I have to say that the part of codepen and HTML was great. Fortunatelly, I didn't pay. But I think that paying for this course is a waste of money. I had a good experience in other Coursera programming course: "An Introduction to Interactive Programming in Python" of Rice Unviersity. The examples were awesome and the tests were reasonable, quite the opposite to this course. Also, Eclipse is so much better than BlueJ in many ways, also into learning... And there's more things that must be improved, but no time and no money. I'm very dissapointed to this course and Duke Univeristy. | in the part one, the last | Exercise | was tremendouly difficult for begginers and | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |